Cover of Legend (Legend #1)
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Legend (Legend #1)

    by Marie, Lu,
    “Legend” by Marie Lu is a dystopian young adult novel set in a war-torn future where the United States has fractured into two opposing nations. The story follows two protagonists: June, a prodigious military cadet from the elite Republic, and Day, a wanted criminal from the impoverished slums. When June’s brother is murdered, Day becomes the prime suspect, leading to a cat-and-mouse chase that unravels government secrets. Themes of class disparity, loyalty, and corruption drive the narrative. The novel’s dual-perspective structure and fast-paced action make it a standout in the genre, appealing to fans of dystopian fiction and political intrigue.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor con­vinc­ing Day to flee after reveal­ing that author­i­ties are tar­get­ing his fam­i­ly. Day, despite his ini­tial shock and con­fu­sion, imme­di­ate­ly trusts the nar­ra­tor and rush­es toward his family’s loca­tion with­out ques­tion­ing the infor­ma­tion. The nar­ra­tor feels a pang of guilt for exploit­ing Day’s trust, reflect­ing on how rare such unwa­ver­ing belief is, even com­par­ing it to rela­tion­ships in their past. The urgency of the sit­u­a­tion is under­scored by the approach­ing sirens, height­en­ing the ten­sion as Day dash­es into the streets.

    Tess, alarmed by Day’s sud­den depar­ture, urges the nar­ra­tor to fol­low and help him. How­ev­er, the nar­ra­tor insists Tess stay behind, pri­or­i­tiz­ing her safe­ty while secret­ly plan­ning to track Day alone. The narrator’s inter­nal con­flict is evi­dent as they grap­ple with their mis­sion to cap­ture Day and the guilt over deceiv­ing him. Tess’s fright­ened reac­tion high­lights her loy­al­ty to Day, con­trast­ing with the narrator’s cal­cu­lat­ed detach­ment. The scene sets up a moral dilem­ma, pit­ting duty against empa­thy.

    The nar­ra­tor con­tacts Thomas, their ally, to coor­di­nate the arrest of Day, empha­siz­ing the need to avoid harm. The com­mu­ni­ca­tion is abrupt­ly cut off, leav­ing the narrator’s instruc­tions incom­plete and adding to the sus­pense. As the nar­ra­tor pur­sues Day through the streets, their phys­i­cal pain mir­rors their emo­tion­al tur­moil. They spot Day in the crowd, torn between their anger and fleet­ing mem­o­ries of his kind­ness, par­tic­u­lar­ly when he helped heal their injury. The chase becomes a metaphor for their con­flict­ing emo­tions.

    Despite their resolve to see Day as a crim­i­nal, the nar­ra­tor strug­gles with their grow­ing sym­pa­thy for him. They chas­tise them­selves for being swayed by his actions, rein­forc­ing their deter­mi­na­tion to ful­fill their mis­sion. The chap­ter ends with the narrator’s inter­nal battle—between vengeance and compassion—intensifying as they close in on Day. The ten­sion between duty and human­i­ty remains unre­solved, leav­ing read­ers antic­i­pat­ing the con­se­quences of their choic­es.

    FAQs

    • 1. What tactic does the narrator use to convince Day to act quickly, and why is it effective?

      Answer:
      The narrator exploits Day’s greatest weakness—his concern for his family—by claiming that guards are coming for them during a sweep, specifically mentioning the house marked with a three-lined X. This is effective because Day’s protective instincts override his usual caution; he doesn’t question the narrator’s credibility or delay action. The chapter highlights his immediate trust in the narrator, noting that “no one has ever taken [their] word so readily before.” This manipulation works precisely because Day prioritizes family over personal safety, a vulnerability the narrator acknowledges with guilt.


      2. Analyze the narrator’s internal conflict regarding Day. How does their perspective shift throughout the chapter?

      Answer:
      The narrator oscillates between resentment and guilt. Initially, they draw on anger from a prior encounter to justify deceiving Day, calling him a “stupid boy” and reminding themselves he’s a criminal. However, they also recall Day’s kindness—saving them from a Skiz fight and gently tending their wound—which creates cognitive dissonance. The line “I want to hate him for confusing me so much” reveals this tension. Their guilt over exploiting Day’s trust (“a surprising pang”) suggests moral ambiguity, complicating their mission-driven mindset.


      3. Why does the narrator insist Tess stay behind, and what does this reveal about their priorities?

      Answer:
      The narrator orders Tess to remain in the alley to minimize collateral damage, stating, “Best to keep her out of this.” This decision reflects their focus on apprehending Day efficiently while avoiding unnecessary complications. However, their fleeting concern for Tess’s fate (“If we arrest Day today, what will happen to her?”) hints at underlying empathy, though it’s quickly overridden by duty. The abrupt dismissal of Tess’s plea to help (“I don’t bother to wait for a reply”) underscores the narrator’s pragmatic, if conflicted, allegiance to their mission over personal connections.


      4. How does the chapter build suspense around the impending confrontation between Day and the authorities?

      Answer:
      Suspense mounts through urgent pacing and fragmented communication. The medic truck sirens and Thomas’s abrupt radio exchange (“Wait for my word—no one’s to be harmed—”) create a sense of impending chaos. Day’s frantic sprint and the narrator’s pursuit (“my wound throbbing in protest”) heighten tension physically, while the unresolved static cutoff leaves their plan ambiguous. The narrator’s internal monologue (“I want to scream at him”) mirrors the reader’s anxiety, culminating in the visual of Day’s cap “peeking out” in the crowd—a fleeting target that underscores the chase’s unpredictability.


      5. Evaluate the significance of trust as a theme in this chapter. Provide textual evidence.

      Answer:
      Trust is both a weapon and a vulnerability. The narrator manipulates Day’s blind trust (“he doesn’t hesitate… doesn’t even wonder why I didn’t tell him right away”), which contrasts sharply with their own cynical view (“stupidly, wholeheartedly trusts me”). This asymmetry drives the plot: Day’s trust stems from familial love, while the narrator’s guilt suggests they recognize its value but subordinate it to duty. Even Tess’s trust is exploited—her “wide eyes” reflect fear, yet she obeys. The chapter critiques trust as a double-edged sword, capable of uniting or betraying characters.

    Quotes

    • 1. “He trusts me—truly, stupidly, wholeheartedly trusts me. In fact, I don’t know if anyone has ever taken my word so readily before. Maybe not even Metias.”

      This quote highlights the protagonist’s internal conflict as they manipulate Day’s trust. It reveals both the depth of Day’s vulnerability and the narrator’s surprising guilt, adding complexity to their relationship and the moral ambiguity of the situation.

      2. “All my anger and fear and anxiety now zero in on the back of his head. I have to force myself to keep enough distance between us so that he doesn’t know I’m following him.”

      This passage captures the narrator’s intense emotional turmoil and the tension of the chase sequence. It shows their conflicting feelings of resentment toward Day while still maintaining their mission focus, illustrating the story’s central tension.

      3. “I have no sympathy for a criminal, I remind myself harshly. Just a score to settle.”

      This concluding thought reveals the narrator’s attempt to justify their actions through black-and-white thinking. The quote is significant as it demonstrates their internal struggle between duty and growing empathy, while foreshadowing potential moral development.

    Quotes

    1. “He trusts me—truly, stupidly, wholeheartedly trusts me. In fact, I don’t know if anyone has ever taken my word so readily before. Maybe not even Metias.”

    This quote highlights the protagonist’s internal conflict as they manipulate Day’s trust. It reveals both the depth of Day’s vulnerability and the narrator’s surprising guilt, adding complexity to their relationship and the moral ambiguity of the situation.

    2. “All my anger and fear and anxiety now zero in on the back of his head. I have to force myself to keep enough distance between us so that he doesn’t know I’m following him.”

    This passage captures the narrator’s intense emotional turmoil and the tension of the chase sequence. It shows their conflicting feelings of resentment toward Day while still maintaining their mission focus, illustrating the story’s central tension.

    3. “I have no sympathy for a criminal, I remind myself harshly. Just a score to settle.”

    This concluding thought reveals the narrator’s attempt to justify their actions through black-and-white thinking. The quote is significant as it demonstrates their internal struggle between duty and growing empathy, while foreshadowing potential moral development.

    FAQs

    1. What tactic does the narrator use to convince Day to act quickly, and why is it effective?

    Answer:
    The narrator exploits Day’s greatest weakness—his concern for his family—by claiming that guards are coming for them during a sweep, specifically mentioning the house marked with a three-lined X. This is effective because Day’s protective instincts override his usual caution; he doesn’t question the narrator’s credibility or delay action. The chapter highlights his immediate trust in the narrator, noting that “no one has ever taken [their] word so readily before.” This manipulation works precisely because Day prioritizes family over personal safety, a vulnerability the narrator acknowledges with guilt.


    2. Analyze the narrator’s internal conflict regarding Day. How does their perspective shift throughout the chapter?

    Answer:
    The narrator oscillates between resentment and guilt. Initially, they draw on anger from a prior encounter to justify deceiving Day, calling him a “stupid boy” and reminding themselves he’s a criminal. However, they also recall Day’s kindness—saving them from a Skiz fight and gently tending their wound—which creates cognitive dissonance. The line “I want to hate him for confusing me so much” reveals this tension. Their guilt over exploiting Day’s trust (“a surprising pang”) suggests moral ambiguity, complicating their mission-driven mindset.


    3. Why does the narrator insist Tess stay behind, and what does this reveal about their priorities?

    Answer:
    The narrator orders Tess to remain in the alley to minimize collateral damage, stating, “Best to keep her out of this.” This decision reflects their focus on apprehending Day efficiently while avoiding unnecessary complications. However, their fleeting concern for Tess’s fate (“If we arrest Day today, what will happen to her?”) hints at underlying empathy, though it’s quickly overridden by duty. The abrupt dismissal of Tess’s plea to help (“I don’t bother to wait for a reply”) underscores the narrator’s pragmatic, if conflicted, allegiance to their mission over personal connections.


    4. How does the chapter build suspense around the impending confrontation between Day and the authorities?

    Answer:
    Suspense mounts through urgent pacing and fragmented communication. The medic truck sirens and Thomas’s abrupt radio exchange (“Wait for my word—no one’s to be harmed—”) create a sense of impending chaos. Day’s frantic sprint and the narrator’s pursuit (“my wound throbbing in protest”) heighten tension physically, while the unresolved static cutoff leaves their plan ambiguous. The narrator’s internal monologue (“I want to scream at him”) mirrors the reader’s anxiety, culminating in the visual of Day’s cap “peeking out” in the crowd—a fleeting target that underscores the chase’s unpredictability.


    5. Evaluate the significance of trust as a theme in this chapter. Provide textual evidence.

    Answer:
    Trust is both a weapon and a vulnerability. The narrator manipulates Day’s blind trust (“he doesn’t hesitate… doesn’t even wonder why I didn’t tell him right away”), which contrasts sharply with their own cynical view (“stupidly, wholeheartedly trusts me”). This asymmetry drives the plot: Day’s trust stems from familial love, while the narrator’s guilt suggests they recognize its value but subordinate it to duty. Even Tess’s trust is exploited—her “wide eyes” reflect fear, yet she obeys. The chapter critiques trust as a double-edged sword, capable of uniting or betraying characters.

    Note