Cover of Legend (Legend #1)
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Legend (Legend #1)

    by Marie, Lu,
    “Legend” by Marie Lu is a dystopian young adult novel set in a war-torn future where the United States has fractured into two opposing nations. The story follows two protagonists: June, a prodigious military cadet from the elite Republic, and Day, a wanted criminal from the impoverished slums. When June’s brother is murdered, Day becomes the prime suspect, leading to a cat-and-mouse chase that unravels government secrets. Themes of class disparity, loyalty, and corruption drive the narrative. The novel’s dual-perspective structure and fast-paced action make it a standout in the genre, appealing to fans of dystopian fiction and political intrigue.

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor secret­ly fol­low­ing Day, who breaks into a quar­an­tined house marked with a dis­tinc­tive three-lined X. Observ­ing his actions, the nar­ra­tor real­izes the sig­nif­i­cance of his vis­it, con­firm­ing sus­pi­cions about his involve­ment in past events. Over­come with anger and self-reproach, the nar­ra­tor reflects on their mis­placed trust and grow­ing feel­ings for Day, ques­tion­ing whether they’ve betrayed the mem­o­ry of their broth­er, Metias. The emo­tion­al tur­moil is pal­pa­ble as they grap­ple with the pos­si­bil­i­ty that Day might be respon­si­ble for Metias’s death.

    From a rooftop hid­ing spot, the nar­ra­tor con­tacts Thomas, their voice trem­bling with sup­pressed emo­tion. They report Day’s loca­tion and the marked house, pro­vid­ing spe­cif­ic details to ensure action is tak­en. Thomas ini­tial­ly responds with detach­ment but grows alert upon hear­ing the con­fir­ma­tion. The narrator’s frus­tra­tion sur­faces as they insist on their cer­tain­ty, empha­siz­ing the need for imme­di­ate back­up to inter­cept Day and his fam­i­ly dur­ing the planned medic oper­a­tion the next day.

    The nar­ra­tor out­lines a strat­e­gy to cap­ture Day’s fam­i­ly, instruct­ing Thomas to deploy troops and trans­port them to Batal­la Hall for ques­tion­ing. Their author­i­ta­tive tone sur­pris­es Thomas, under­scor­ing their deter­mi­na­tion to rec­ti­fy their ear­li­er lapse in judg­ment. Despite lin­ger­ing mem­o­ries of their inti­mate moments with Day, the nar­ra­tor force­ful­ly dis­miss­es them, rein­forc­ing their resolve to see jus­tice served. The exchange high­lights the narrator’s inter­nal con­flict between per­son­al feel­ings and duty.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with the nar­ra­tor return­ing to their hid­ing spot, ensur­ing Day remains unaware of their sur­veil­lance. The ten­sion between their past attrac­tion and present mis­sion lingers, set­ting the stage for the impend­ing con­fronta­tion. The narrator’s hard­ened resolve con­trasts sharply with their ear­li­er vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, mark­ing a piv­otal shift in their approach to uncov­er­ing the truth about Day and aveng­ing Metias.

    FAQs

    • 1. What does June witness Day doing in the middle of the night, and why is this significant?

      Answer:
      June observes Day breaking into a quarantine zone and entering a house marked with a three-lined X before reappearing minutes later. This is significant because it confirms Day’s connection to the house, which June later learns is linked to a “special plague case” to be investigated by authorities. The discovery solidifies June’s suspicion that Day is involved with the inhabitants of the house—likely his family—and reinforces her belief that he may be responsible for her brother Metias’s death. This moment is a turning point where June shifts from conflicted emotions to decisive action.

      2. How does June’s emotional conflict manifest in this chapter, and what does it reveal about her character?

      Answer:
      June struggles with anger at herself for developing feelings for Day, whom she suspects killed her brother. She questions whether she is making excuses to protect him, calling herself an “idiot” and worrying she has shamed Metias’s memory. This internal turmoil reveals her loyalty to her brother, her disciplined upbringing (as she criticizes her “simpleminded” behavior), and her vulnerability—despite her training, she is not immune to emotional attachments. Her eventual decision to report Day shows her prioritization of duty over personal feelings.

      3. Analyze the dynamics between June and Thomas in their communication. What does their interaction suggest about their relationship and roles?

      Answer:
      Thomas initially responds to June with detachment, but his tone shifts to excitement when he realizes the importance of her discovery. June asserts authority by demanding troops and specifying how Day’s family should be handled, which surprises Thomas. This interaction highlights their hierarchical relationship: June, as a high-ranking officer, expects immediate compliance, while Thomas, though subordinate, questions her certainty. The tension suggests he may doubt her judgment or feel sidelined. Their roles are professional, but underlying power struggles and trust issues are evident.

      4. Why does June insist on taking Day’s family to Batalla Hall’s hospital wing “for questioning” rather than harming them? What strategy might she be employing?

      Answer:
      June likely aims to use Day’s family as leverage to capture or control him. By keeping them unharmed, she preserves them as valuable bargaining chips, ensuring Day will cooperate or reveal himself to protect them. This tactic aligns with her training in psychological strategy—targeting an enemy’s weaknesses. It also reflects her conflicted morality; she avoids unnecessary violence, possibly due to lingering empathy for Day or her commitment to “proper” military protocol, despite her personal vendetta.

      5. How does the chapter use sensory details (e.g., the memory of Day’s kiss) to contrast June’s emotional and professional conflicts?

      Answer:
      The vivid recollection of Day’s kiss and touch (“his hands running across my skin”) contrasts sharply with June’s cold resolution to betray him. These sensory memories emphasize her internal struggle: the physical attraction is potent enough to haunt her, yet she dismisses it as “worse than nothing.” The juxtaposition highlights the tension between her human desires and her disciplined persona. The warmth of the memory clashes with the clinical execution of her plan, underscoring the tragedy of her forced emotional suppression.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I’d let myself get carried away with the last person I ever wanted to like. That I ever wanted to ache for.”

      This quote captures the protagonist’s internal conflict and emotional turmoil as she realizes she has developed feelings for Day, the person she suspects killed her brother. It highlights the tension between her duty and her unexpected personal attachment.

      2. “Maybe Day didn’t kill Metias, I tell myself. Maybe it was someone else. God—am I making excuses to protect this boy now?”

      This moment reveals the protagonist’s struggle with doubt and rationalization, showcasing her wavering resolve as she grapples with her suspicions about Day. It underscores the theme of conflicting loyalties and the complexity of her emotions.

      3. “Have the streets of Lake turned me into some simpleminded girl? Have I just shamed the memory of my brother?”

      Here, the protagonist questions her own judgment and strength, reflecting on whether her actions have dishonored her brother’s memory. This quote emphasizes her guilt and self-doubt, adding depth to her character and motivations.

      4. “I want them there for questioning. No one’s to be hurt.”

      This line reveals the protagonist’s calculated and strategic side as she plans to capture Day’s family. It contrasts with her earlier emotional vulnerability, showing her determination to uphold justice while still maintaining a semblance of control and restraint.

      5. “The feel of Day’s lips, our heated kiss, and his hands running across my skin—it should all mean nothing to me now. Worse than nothing. ‘I am right.’”

      This quote powerfully juxtaposes the protagonist’s lingering physical memories of Day with her resolute decision to pursue him as a suspect. It encapsulates the chapter’s central conflict between emotion and duty, ending on a note of hardened resolve.

    Quotes

    1. “I’d let myself get carried away with the last person I ever wanted to like. That I ever wanted to ache for.”

    This quote captures the protagonist’s internal conflict and emotional turmoil as she realizes she has developed feelings for Day, the person she suspects killed her brother. It highlights the tension between her duty and her unexpected personal attachment.

    2. “Maybe Day didn’t kill Metias, I tell myself. Maybe it was someone else. God—am I making excuses to protect this boy now?”

    This moment reveals the protagonist’s struggle with doubt and rationalization, showcasing her wavering resolve as she grapples with her suspicions about Day. It underscores the theme of conflicting loyalties and the complexity of her emotions.

    3. “Have the streets of Lake turned me into some simpleminded girl? Have I just shamed the memory of my brother?”

    Here, the protagonist questions her own judgment and strength, reflecting on whether her actions have dishonored her brother’s memory. This quote emphasizes her guilt and self-doubt, adding depth to her character and motivations.

    4. “I want them there for questioning. No one’s to be hurt.”

    This line reveals the protagonist’s calculated and strategic side as she plans to capture Day’s family. It contrasts with her earlier emotional vulnerability, showing her determination to uphold justice while still maintaining a semblance of control and restraint.

    5. “The feel of Day’s lips, our heated kiss, and his hands running across my skin—it should all mean nothing to me now. Worse than nothing. ‘I am right.’”

    This quote powerfully juxtaposes the protagonist’s lingering physical memories of Day with her resolute decision to pursue him as a suspect. It encapsulates the chapter’s central conflict between emotion and duty, ending on a note of hardened resolve.

    FAQs

    1. What does June witness Day doing in the middle of the night, and why is this significant?

    Answer:
    June observes Day breaking into a quarantine zone and entering a house marked with a three-lined X before reappearing minutes later. This is significant because it confirms Day’s connection to the house, which June later learns is linked to a “special plague case” to be investigated by authorities. The discovery solidifies June’s suspicion that Day is involved with the inhabitants of the house—likely his family—and reinforces her belief that he may be responsible for her brother Metias’s death. This moment is a turning point where June shifts from conflicted emotions to decisive action.

    2. How does June’s emotional conflict manifest in this chapter, and what does it reveal about her character?

    Answer:
    June struggles with anger at herself for developing feelings for Day, whom she suspects killed her brother. She questions whether she is making excuses to protect him, calling herself an “idiot” and worrying she has shamed Metias’s memory. This internal turmoil reveals her loyalty to her brother, her disciplined upbringing (as she criticizes her “simpleminded” behavior), and her vulnerability—despite her training, she is not immune to emotional attachments. Her eventual decision to report Day shows her prioritization of duty over personal feelings.

    3. Analyze the dynamics between June and Thomas in their communication. What does their interaction suggest about their relationship and roles?

    Answer:
    Thomas initially responds to June with detachment, but his tone shifts to excitement when he realizes the importance of her discovery. June asserts authority by demanding troops and specifying how Day’s family should be handled, which surprises Thomas. This interaction highlights their hierarchical relationship: June, as a high-ranking officer, expects immediate compliance, while Thomas, though subordinate, questions her certainty. The tension suggests he may doubt her judgment or feel sidelined. Their roles are professional, but underlying power struggles and trust issues are evident.

    4. Why does June insist on taking Day’s family to Batalla Hall’s hospital wing “for questioning” rather than harming them? What strategy might she be employing?

    Answer:
    June likely aims to use Day’s family as leverage to capture or control him. By keeping them unharmed, she preserves them as valuable bargaining chips, ensuring Day will cooperate or reveal himself to protect them. This tactic aligns with her training in psychological strategy—targeting an enemy’s weaknesses. It also reflects her conflicted morality; she avoids unnecessary violence, possibly due to lingering empathy for Day or her commitment to “proper” military protocol, despite her personal vendetta.

    5. How does the chapter use sensory details (e.g., the memory of Day’s kiss) to contrast June’s emotional and professional conflicts?

    Answer:
    The vivid recollection of Day’s kiss and touch (“his hands running across my skin”) contrasts sharply with June’s cold resolution to betray him. These sensory memories emphasize her internal struggle: the physical attraction is potent enough to haunt her, yet she dismisses it as “worse than nothing.” The juxtaposition highlights the tension between her human desires and her disciplined persona. The warmth of the memory clashes with the clinical execution of her plan, underscoring the tragedy of her forced emotional suppression.

    Note