Cover of Legend (Legend #1)
    Adventure FictionScience FictionYoung Adult

    Legend (Legend #1)

    by Marie, Lu,
    “Legend” by Marie Lu is a dystopian young adult novel set in a war-torn future where the United States has fractured into two opposing nations. The story follows two protagonists: June, a prodigious military cadet from the elite Republic, and Day, a wanted criminal from the impoverished slums. When June’s brother is murdered, Day becomes the prime suspect, leading to a cat-and-mouse chase that unravels government secrets. Themes of class disparity, loyalty, and corruption drive the narrative. The novel’s dual-perspective structure and fast-paced action make it a standout in the genre, appealing to fans of dystopian fiction and political intrigue.

    The chap­ter opens with the pro­tag­o­nist, Day, reflect­ing on his sta­tus as the Republic’s most want­ed crim­i­nal. Despite being alive, he allows his moth­er to believe he’s dead for her safe­ty. His Want­ed poster fre­quent­ly appears on Los Ange­les’ Jum­boTrons, show­cas­ing exag­ger­at­ed crimes and vary­ing descrip­tions of his appear­ance, high­light­ing the Republic’s igno­rance about him. Day takes pride in his anonymi­ty, which under­mines the government’s author­i­ty and fuels their des­per­a­tion to cap­ture him. The pro­pa­gan­da-filled cityscape con­trasts sharply with his hid­den exis­tence, empha­siz­ing the oppres­sive regime he resists.

    Day observes his family’s neigh­bor­hood from a derelict apart­ment, accom­pa­nied by Tess, his younger com­pan­ion. The sec­tor is rav­aged by plague, and sol­diers con­duct inva­sive inspec­tions, mark­ing infect­ed homes with red Xs. Day’s anx­i­ety grows as he watch­es them approach his family’s house, fear­ing they’ll be flagged. Tess urges him to leave the city tem­porar­i­ly, but he refus­es, deter­mined to ensure his family’s safe­ty. Their dia­logue reveals Day’s stub­born loy­al­ty and Tess’s pro­tec­tive con­cern, under­scor­ing the ten­sion between sur­vival and famil­ial duty.

    A chill­ing scene unfolds as sol­diers exe­cute a plague vic­tim, show­cas­ing the Republic’s bru­tal effi­cien­cy. Day admires their advanced weapon­ry but acknowl­edges the risk of using trace­able guns, rely­ing instead on makeshift weapons. The encounter rein­forces the ever-present dan­ger of their world. Mean­while, Tess attempts to dis­tract Day by ask­ing about the gifts he’s brought for his fam­i­ly, includ­ing gog­gles for his broth­er John. These stolen sup­plies rep­re­sent Day’s des­per­ate efforts to pro­vide for his loved ones despite his out­law sta­tus.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Day’s bit­ter­sweet reflec­tion on his inabil­i­ty to reunite with his fam­i­ly open­ly. His gifts—practical items like food and shoes—symbolize his endur­ing con­nec­tion to them, even as he remains a ghost in their lives. The loom­ing inspec­tion of his family’s home height­ens the sus­pense, leav­ing read­ers anx­ious about their fate. Day’s resilience and Tess’s unwa­ver­ing sup­port paint a poignant pic­ture of sur­vival and sac­ri­fice in a dystopi­an world.

    FAQs

    • 1. Why does Day’s mother believe he is dead, and why is this belief strategically important for him?

      Answer:
      Day allows his mother to believe he is dead because it is safer for both of them. As the Republic’s most wanted criminal, his survival threatens the regime’s image, making him a high-priority target. If his mother knew he was alive, she might be interrogated or used as leverage against him. The Republic’s inability to identify Day (evidenced by inconsistent Wanted posters) suggests their database lacks his records, which fuels their frustration. By maintaining his “death,” Day protects his family from retaliation while continuing his subversive activities unnoticed (Chapter: “Day 1”).

      2. Analyze the significance of the Republic’s propaganda on the JumboTrons. How does it contrast with Day’s wanted poster, and what does this reveal about the government’s priorities?

      Answer:
      The JumboTrons display a stark contrast between the Republic’s idealized propaganda (happy citizens, anti-Colonies messages) and Day’s wanted poster. This juxtaposition highlights the government’s focus on maintaining control through both inspiration (showing utopian imagery) and fear (hunting dissidents like Day). The propaganda aims to unify citizens against external threats (the Colonies) while suppressing internal dissent. Day’s poster disrupts this narrative by exposing the Republic’s failure to capture him, undermining their authority. The inconsistent photos of Day further emphasize the regime’s incompetence, which they desperately try to conceal (Chapter: “Day 1”).

      3. How does the plague inspection process exemplify the Republic’s authoritarian control, and what risks does Day face by observing it?

      Answer:
      The plague inspections demonstrate the Republic’s brutal efficiency in maintaining order. Soldiers forcibly enter homes, test residents, and mark infected houses with red Xs, condemning occupants to isolation or death. This process instills fear and ensures compliance. Day risks exposure by surveilling these inspections, as his presence in a quarantined sector could lead to capture or infection. His emotional turmoil—watching soldiers approach his family’s home—reveals the personal toll of resisting the regime. Tess’s concern underscores the danger: their vigilance could backfire if Day’s attachment to his family compromises his caution (Chapter: “Day 1”).

      4. Evaluate Day’s relationship with Tess. How does their dynamic reflect their survival strategies in this dystopian society?

      Answer:
      Day and Tess share a partnership rooted in mutual dependence and contrasting temperaments. Day is impulsive and emotionally driven (e.g., insisting on checking his family despite risks), while Tess acts as his pragmatic counterbalance, urging caution. Their roles mirror survival necessities: Day’s boldness secures resources (e.g., stolen goggles, food), and Tess’s foresight preserves their safety (e.g., suggesting they flee the plague). Her younger age belies her maturity, as she often assumes a caretaker role. Together, they embody the adaptability required to navigate the Republic’s oppression, blending rebellion with practicality (Chapter: “Day 1”).

      5. Why does Day avoid using guns, despite their affordability and effectiveness? What does this reveal about the Republic’s surveillance tactics?

      Answer:
      Day avoids guns because their tracking technology (sensors recording hand shape, thumbprints, and location) would instantly identify him. While guns are cheap and powerful, their traceability outweighs their utility for a fugitive. This detail exposes the Republic’s pervasive surveillance: even weapons are designed to monitor users. Day’s reliance on homemade weapons (slingshots, knives) reflects his need to operate undetected. His father’s remark about stolen Colonies tech further hints at the Republic’s hypocrisy—using enemy innovations while vilifying them in propaganda (Chapter: “Day 1”).

    Quotes

    • 1. “MY MOTHER THINKS I’M DEAD. Obviously I’m not dead, but it’s safer for her to think so.”

      This opening line immediately establishes the protagonist’s precarious existence as a fugitive, highlighting the emotional sacrifice of being separated from family for mutual protection. It sets the tone for the dystopian world where survival requires harsh choices.

      2. “They don’t seem to know much of anything about me, except that I’m young and that when they run my fingerprints they don’t find a match in their databases. That’s why they hate me, why I’m not the most dangerous criminal in the country, but the most wanted. I make them look bad.”

      This quote reveals the Republic’s incompetence and the protagonist’s symbolic threat to their authority. It underscores the theme of institutional fragility in oppressive regimes where perception matters more than truth.

      3. “One plague victim isn’t much of a threat. The soldier lifts his gun and aims. A volley of sparks engulfs the infected woman.”

      This chilling description of the plague response demonstrates the brutal efficiency of the Republic’s military and the dehumanization of citizens, illustrating the harsh realities of life under this regime.

      4. “Each gun has a sensor on it that reports its user’s hand shape, thumbprints, and location. If that didn’t give me away, nothing would. So I’m left with my homemade weapons, PVC pipe slingshots, and other trinkets.”

      This passage highlights the sophisticated surveillance state and the protagonist’s resourceful adaptation to it, emphasizing the constant tension between technology and resistance in this dystopia.

    Quotes

    1. “MY MOTHER THINKS I’M DEAD. Obviously I’m not dead, but it’s safer for her to think so.”

    This opening line immediately establishes the protagonist’s precarious existence as a fugitive, highlighting the emotional sacrifice of being separated from family for mutual protection. It sets the tone for the dystopian world where survival requires harsh choices.

    2. “They don’t seem to know much of anything about me, except that I’m young and that when they run my fingerprints they don’t find a match in their databases. That’s why they hate me, why I’m not the most dangerous criminal in the country, but the most wanted. I make them look bad.”

    This quote reveals the Republic’s incompetence and the protagonist’s symbolic threat to their authority. It underscores the theme of institutional fragility in oppressive regimes where perception matters more than truth.

    3. “One plague victim isn’t much of a threat. The soldier lifts his gun and aims. A volley of sparks engulfs the infected woman.”

    This chilling description of the plague response demonstrates the brutal efficiency of the Republic’s military and the dehumanization of citizens, illustrating the harsh realities of life under this regime.

    4. “Each gun has a sensor on it that reports its user’s hand shape, thumbprints, and location. If that didn’t give me away, nothing would. So I’m left with my homemade weapons, PVC pipe slingshots, and other trinkets.”

    This passage highlights the sophisticated surveillance state and the protagonist’s resourceful adaptation to it, emphasizing the constant tension between technology and resistance in this dystopia.

    FAQs

    1. Why does Day’s mother believe he is dead, and why is this belief strategically important for him?

    Answer:
    Day allows his mother to believe he is dead because it is safer for both of them. As the Republic’s most wanted criminal, his survival threatens the regime’s image, making him a high-priority target. If his mother knew he was alive, she might be interrogated or used as leverage against him. The Republic’s inability to identify Day (evidenced by inconsistent Wanted posters) suggests their database lacks his records, which fuels their frustration. By maintaining his “death,” Day protects his family from retaliation while continuing his subversive activities unnoticed (Chapter: “Day 1”).

    2. Analyze the significance of the Republic’s propaganda on the JumboTrons. How does it contrast with Day’s wanted poster, and what does this reveal about the government’s priorities?

    Answer:
    The JumboTrons display a stark contrast between the Republic’s idealized propaganda (happy citizens, anti-Colonies messages) and Day’s wanted poster. This juxtaposition highlights the government’s focus on maintaining control through both inspiration (showing utopian imagery) and fear (hunting dissidents like Day). The propaganda aims to unify citizens against external threats (the Colonies) while suppressing internal dissent. Day’s poster disrupts this narrative by exposing the Republic’s failure to capture him, undermining their authority. The inconsistent photos of Day further emphasize the regime’s incompetence, which they desperately try to conceal (Chapter: “Day 1”).

    3. How does the plague inspection process exemplify the Republic’s authoritarian control, and what risks does Day face by observing it?

    Answer:
    The plague inspections demonstrate the Republic’s brutal efficiency in maintaining order. Soldiers forcibly enter homes, test residents, and mark infected houses with red Xs, condemning occupants to isolation or death. This process instills fear and ensures compliance. Day risks exposure by surveilling these inspections, as his presence in a quarantined sector could lead to capture or infection. His emotional turmoil—watching soldiers approach his family’s home—reveals the personal toll of resisting the regime. Tess’s concern underscores the danger: their vigilance could backfire if Day’s attachment to his family compromises his caution (Chapter: “Day 1”).

    4. Evaluate Day’s relationship with Tess. How does their dynamic reflect their survival strategies in this dystopian society?

    Answer:
    Day and Tess share a partnership rooted in mutual dependence and contrasting temperaments. Day is impulsive and emotionally driven (e.g., insisting on checking his family despite risks), while Tess acts as his pragmatic counterbalance, urging caution. Their roles mirror survival necessities: Day’s boldness secures resources (e.g., stolen goggles, food), and Tess’s foresight preserves their safety (e.g., suggesting they flee the plague). Her younger age belies her maturity, as she often assumes a caretaker role. Together, they embody the adaptability required to navigate the Republic’s oppression, blending rebellion with practicality (Chapter: “Day 1”).

    5. Why does Day avoid using guns, despite their affordability and effectiveness? What does this reveal about the Republic’s surveillance tactics?

    Answer:
    Day avoids guns because their tracking technology (sensors recording hand shape, thumbprints, and location) would instantly identify him. While guns are cheap and powerful, their traceability outweighs their utility for a fugitive. This detail exposes the Republic’s pervasive surveillance: even weapons are designed to monitor users. Day’s reliance on homemade weapons (slingshots, knives) reflects his need to operate undetected. His father’s remark about stolen Colonies tech further hints at the Republic’s hypocrisy—using enemy innovations while vilifying them in propaganda (Chapter: “Day 1”).

    Note