Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Good Material
    DystopianLiterary Fiction

    Good Material

    by Alderton, Dolly
    Good Material by Dolly Alderton follows Andy Dawson, a 35-year-old comedian grappling with the end of a long-term relationship. The novel explores male heartbreak, emotional vulnerability, and the complexities of adult friendships. It provides a nuanced portrayal of navigating loss, dating, and self-discovery in one’s thirties, highlighting the often overlooked emotional struggles men face after breakups.
    PreviousNext
    Good Material

    Monday 21st October 2019

    by Alderton, Dolly

    The chap­ter opens with the nar­ra­tor wak­ing up to a dis­con­cert­ing text from a bare­ly known come­di­an, hint­ing at trou­bling online dis­cus­sions involv­ing them. Ini­tial­ly con­fused and anx­ious, the nar­ra­tor search­es online, dis­cov­er­ing a crit­i­cal arti­cle titled “RIP STAND-UP COMEDY” that harsh­ly con­demns the cur­rent state of stand-up com­e­dy, using come­di­an Andy Daw­son as an emblem of its decline. The arti­cle dis­miss­es Daw­son’s style as unin­spired and repet­i­tive, sym­bol­iz­ing a broad­er cul­tur­al stag­na­tion in com­e­dy. This rev­e­la­tion shocks the nar­ra­tor, who begins to ques­tion the rel­e­vance and qual­i­ty of tra­di­tion­al comedic forms dom­i­nat­ed by uno­rig­i­nal per­form­ers.

    As the nar­ra­tor delves deep­er, they encounter a flood of online com­ments react­ing to the arti­cle. The respons­es vary from enthu­si­as­tic sup­port to dis­mis­sive indif­fer­ence, reflect­ing a divid­ed pub­lic opin­ion on both the arti­cle and the come­di­an in ques­tion. The nar­ra­tor observes this dig­i­tal “par­ty” of voic­es, not­ing the mix of humor, crit­i­cism, and per­son­al anec­dotes that reveal the com­plex­i­ties of the com­e­dy scene and its audi­ence. This engage­ment with the online dis­course inten­si­fies the narrator’s intro­spec­tion about their own place with­in this ecosys­tem and the impact of such pub­lic scruti­ny.

    The chap­ter then shifts focus to the narrator’s per­son­al reflec­tions trig­gered by a dis­parag­ing com­ment from some­one who attend­ed the same school years ear­li­er. This prompts a painful self-exam­i­na­tion of their past behav­ior and rep­u­ta­tion, exac­er­bat­ing feel­ings of vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty and iso­la­tion. The nar­ra­tor grap­ples with the desire to reach out to old acquain­tances for reas­sur­ance but is hin­dered by pride, fear of judg­ment, and con­cern over bur­den­ing close rela­tion­ships. This inter­nal con­flict under­scores the emo­tion­al toll that pub­lic crit­i­cism and social media expo­sure inflict on indi­vid­u­als.

    In the clos­ing moments, the nar­ra­tor con­fronts the lone­li­ness of their sit­u­a­tion, long­ing for a con­fi­dant who can pro­vide com­fort and per­spec­tive away from the relent­less online chat­ter. They express a deep need for human con­nec­tion and escape from the dig­i­tal noise, illus­trat­ing the pro­found per­son­al con­se­quences of pub­lic con­tro­ver­sy in the mod­ern age. The chap­ter poignant­ly cap­tures the inter­sec­tion of pub­lic per­sona, online cul­ture, and pri­vate vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, set­ting a reflec­tive and somber tone for the nar­ra­tive.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What initial event sets the tone for the narrator’s experience at the start of the chapter, and how does this event influence their emotional state?

      Answer:
      The chapter begins with the narrator waking up after having slept through an earthquake, which is an unsettling and disorienting start. Shortly after waking, the narrator receives a text from a comedian they barely know, expressing concern about something happening online. This message immediately causes the narrator’s heart to race and breath to shorten, indicating panic and anxiety. This sets a tense, anxious tone that permeates the chapter as the narrator begins to discover a critical article about themselves circulating online. The earthquake metaphorically parallels the emotional upheaval the narrator experiences, amplifying their sense of instability and vulnerability.

      2. How does the narrator’s discovery of the article titled “RIP STAND-UP COMEDY” affect their perception of themselves and their career?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s discovery of the article is profoundly unsettling. The article harshly criticizes a comedian named Andy Dawson and, by association, the type of stand-up comedy the narrator is involved in. Although the narrator initially tries to read the article objectively, they find themselves only able to retain certain negative phrases, indicating emotional distress. The article’s tone, which declares the death of traditional observational comedy and calls for its replacement, implicitly challenges the narrator’s professional identity. This causes the narrator to confront feelings of insecurity, self-doubt, and the fear that their career—and the art form they practice—is being publicly dismantled.

      3. Analyze how the narrator’s interaction with the online comments section contributes to the development of the chapter’s themes.

      Answer:
      The narrator’s deep dive into the online comments amplifies the themes of public scrutiny, identity crisis, and social isolation. Reading hundreds of comments, many of which are harsh, dismissive, or mocking, the narrator feels exposed and vulnerable. The comments range from supportive to cruel, reflecting the unpredictable nature of online discourse. This interaction highlights the theme of how digital platforms can amplify personal and professional attacks, making private pain public. It also underscores the loneliness of facing such criticism alone, as the narrator struggles to find someone to confide in, emphasizing the alienation caused by social media backlash.

      4. What does the narrator’s reflection on their school days and the comment from a stranger reveal about their internal conflict?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s reflection on their school days, triggered by a hostile comment from someone who attended the same school years later, reveals an internal conflict between past and present self-perceptions. The narrator questions whether they were truly as unpleasant as the commenter suggests, indicating a struggle with self-image and the fear of being misunderstood or judged unfairly. This moment of doubt and self-scrutiny illustrates the narrator’s vulnerability and the lasting impact of external criticism on their sense of identity. It also shows how public criticism can provoke private introspection, blurring the lines between personal history and current reputation.

      5. Considering the narrator’s reluctance to share their distress with close contacts, what does this suggest about the stigma or challenges associated with mental health and vulnerability in the context of public figures?

      Answer:
      The narrator’s hesitation to reach out to family, friends, or colleagues reveals the stigma and challenges public figures often face regarding mental health and vulnerability. They avoid burdening loved ones with worry, fear judgment or pity from peers, and worry about damaging their professional image. This reluctance suggests that public figures may feel isolated in their struggles, pressured to maintain a facade of strength despite inner turmoil. It highlights the difficulty of seeking support when one’s reputation is at stake and underscores the broader societal issue where vulnerability is often perceived as weakness, especially in the public eye. The narrator’s desire to find just one person to confide in emphasizes the critical need for trusted support systems in such situations.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Last week, I witnessed the death of stand-up comedy as we know it. RIP, goodbye, we had some laughs except, honestly, no we didn’t.”

      This quote opens the chapter with a powerful and provocative declaration about the perceived decline of traditional stand-up comedy. It sets the tone for the chapter’s critical examination of the comedy industry and introduces the central theme of cultural and artistic change.

      2. “To call this sort of thoughtless drivel ‘observational comedy’ is to hugely underplay what the art of humans observing human behaviour can and should be. ‘Observational comedy’ as we know it must die today along with Andy Dawson’s career.”

      Here, the author critiques a particular style of comedy, using the figure of Andy Dawson as a symbol for what is seen as stale and uninspired humor. This quote highlights the chapter’s argument that comedy needs reinvention to reclaim its artistic value and relevance.

      3. “Surely we have given enough stage space and airtime to balding men ambling around in bad jeans making remarks that have been said by another balding man in bad jeans before them? Surely it’s time to try something else? Comedy that says something new, does something useful or simply just, I don’t know, makes us laugh?”

      This passage questions the repetitiveness and homogeneity of the current comedy scene, calling for innovation and diversity in comedic voices and styles. It represents a turning point in the chapter where the author advocates for change and renewal in the art form.

      4. “We therefore commit this stand-up career to the ground, earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust; in sure and certain hope of the Resurrection to eternal silence. Only then, in its place, can something take life that is new, imaginative and, please dear God, at least a bit funny.”

      This eloquent and metaphorical conclusion frames the death of old-style stand-up as a necessary prelude to a creative rebirth. It captures the chapter’s ultimate hope for comedy’s future: a fresh start that embraces originality and genuine humor.

      5. “I don’t want any­one whose opinion I care about to read these things about me, so I can’t talk about it to any­one whose opinion I care about. There’s only one person I want to talk to. The only person who could reassure me and put it in perspective and go to the pub with me and make me turn my phone off…”

      This intimate and vulnerable reflection reveals the personal impact of public criticism and online discourse on the author. It adds a human dimension to the chapter’s broader themes, illustrating the emotional toll behind the cultural critique.

    Quotes

    1. “Last week, I witnessed the death of stand-up comedy as we know it. RIP, goodbye, we had some laughs except, honestly, no we didn’t.”

    This quote opens the chapter with a powerful and provocative declaration about the perceived decline of traditional stand-up comedy. It sets the tone for the chapter’s critical examination of the comedy industry and introduces the central theme of cultural and artistic change.

    2. “To call this sort of thoughtless drivel ‘observational comedy’ is to hugely underplay what the art of humans observing human behaviour can and should be. ‘Observational comedy’ as we know it must die today along with Andy Dawson’s career.”

    Here, the author critiques a particular style of comedy, using the figure of Andy Dawson as a symbol for what is seen as stale and uninspired humor. This quote highlights the chapter’s argument that comedy needs reinvention to reclaim its artistic value and relevance.

    3. “Surely we have given enough stage space and airtime to balding men ambling around in bad jeans making remarks that have been said by another balding man in bad jeans before them? Surely it’s time to try something else? Comedy that says something new, does something useful or simply just, I don’t know, makes us laugh?”

    This passage questions the repetitiveness and homogeneity of the current comedy scene, calling for innovation and diversity in comedic voices and styles. It represents a turning point in the chapter where the author advocates for change and renewal in the art form.

    4. “We therefore commit this stand-up career to the ground, earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust; in sure and certain hope of the Resurrection to eternal silence. Only then, in its place, can something take life that is new, imaginative and, please dear God, at least a bit funny.”

    This eloquent and metaphorical conclusion frames the death of old-style stand-up as a necessary prelude to a creative rebirth. It captures the chapter’s ultimate hope for comedy’s future: a fresh start that embraces originality and genuine humor.

    5. “I don’t want any­one whose opinion I care about to read these things about me, so I can’t talk about it to any­one whose opinion I care about. There’s only one person I want to talk to. The only person who could reassure me and put it in perspective and go to the pub with me and make me turn my phone off…”

    This intimate and vulnerable reflection reveals the personal impact of public criticism and online discourse on the author. It adds a human dimension to the chapter’s broader themes, illustrating the emotional toll behind the cultural critique.

    FAQs

    1. What initial event sets the tone for the narrator’s experience at the start of the chapter, and how does this event influence their emotional state?

    Answer:
    The chapter begins with the narrator waking up after having slept through an earthquake, which is an unsettling and disorienting start. Shortly after waking, the narrator receives a text from a comedian they barely know, expressing concern about something happening online. This message immediately causes the narrator’s heart to race and breath to shorten, indicating panic and anxiety. This sets a tense, anxious tone that permeates the chapter as the narrator begins to discover a critical article about themselves circulating online. The earthquake metaphorically parallels the emotional upheaval the narrator experiences, amplifying their sense of instability and vulnerability.

    2. How does the narrator’s discovery of the article titled “RIP STAND-UP COMEDY” affect their perception of themselves and their career?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s discovery of the article is profoundly unsettling. The article harshly criticizes a comedian named Andy Dawson and, by association, the type of stand-up comedy the narrator is involved in. Although the narrator initially tries to read the article objectively, they find themselves only able to retain certain negative phrases, indicating emotional distress. The article’s tone, which declares the death of traditional observational comedy and calls for its replacement, implicitly challenges the narrator’s professional identity. This causes the narrator to confront feelings of insecurity, self-doubt, and the fear that their career—and the art form they practice—is being publicly dismantled.

    3. Analyze how the narrator’s interaction with the online comments section contributes to the development of the chapter’s themes.

    Answer:
    The narrator’s deep dive into the online comments amplifies the themes of public scrutiny, identity crisis, and social isolation. Reading hundreds of comments, many of which are harsh, dismissive, or mocking, the narrator feels exposed and vulnerable. The comments range from supportive to cruel, reflecting the unpredictable nature of online discourse. This interaction highlights the theme of how digital platforms can amplify personal and professional attacks, making private pain public. It also underscores the loneliness of facing such criticism alone, as the narrator struggles to find someone to confide in, emphasizing the alienation caused by social media backlash.

    4. What does the narrator’s reflection on their school days and the comment from a stranger reveal about their internal conflict?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s reflection on their school days, triggered by a hostile comment from someone who attended the same school years later, reveals an internal conflict between past and present self-perceptions. The narrator questions whether they were truly as unpleasant as the commenter suggests, indicating a struggle with self-image and the fear of being misunderstood or judged unfairly. This moment of doubt and self-scrutiny illustrates the narrator’s vulnerability and the lasting impact of external criticism on their sense of identity. It also shows how public criticism can provoke private introspection, blurring the lines between personal history and current reputation.

    5. Considering the narrator’s reluctance to share their distress with close contacts, what does this suggest about the stigma or challenges associated with mental health and vulnerability in the context of public figures?

    Answer:
    The narrator’s hesitation to reach out to family, friends, or colleagues reveals the stigma and challenges public figures often face regarding mental health and vulnerability. They avoid burdening loved ones with worry, fear judgment or pity from peers, and worry about damaging their professional image. This reluctance suggests that public figures may feel isolated in their struggles, pressured to maintain a facade of strength despite inner turmoil. It highlights the difficulty of seeking support when one’s reputation is at stake and underscores the broader societal issue where vulnerability is often perceived as weakness, especially in the public eye. The narrator’s desire to find just one person to confide in emphasizes the critical need for trusted support systems in such situations.

    Note