Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Animal Farm
    Dystopian

    Animal Farm

    by Orwell, George
    George Orwell’s Animal Farm (1945) is a satirical allegory of the Russian Revolution and Stalinist corruption. The animals of Manor Farm, inspired by Old Major’s vision of equality, overthrow their human oppressor, Mr. Jones, and establish a self-governing farm under the slogan “All animals are equal.” The pigs, led by Napoleon and Snowball, initially champion collective labor, but power soon corrupts them. Napoleon exiles Snowball, manipulates the other animals through propaganda, and gradually adopts human vices, betraying the revolution’s ideals. The novella critiques totalitarianism, illustrating how revolutionary ideals can be subverted by authoritarianism. Its enduring relevance lies in its exploration of power dynamics and political manipulation.
    PreviousNext
    Animal Farm

    Chapter V

    by Orwell, George

    The chap­ter opens with Mol­lie, the vain mare, becom­ing increas­ing­ly unre­li­able as win­ter approach­es. She neglects her duties, admires her reflec­tion, and is even­tu­al­ly con­front­ed by Clover about con­sort­ing with a human from a neigh­bor­ing farm. When Clover dis­cov­ers hid­den sug­ar and rib­bons in Mol­lie’s stall, it con­firms her sus­pi­cions of betray­al. Mol­lie soon aban­dons Ani­mal Farm alto­geth­er, choos­ing a life of com­fort under human care, sym­bol­ized by her appear­ance pulling a dog­cart with a red ribbon—a stark con­trast to the far­m’s prin­ci­ples. Her depar­ture marks the first instance of an ani­mal reject­ing the rebel­lion’s ideals for per­son­al com­fort.

    As harsh win­ter sets in, the pigs assume lead­er­ship, with Snow­ball and Napoleon emerg­ing as rival fig­ures. Their dis­agree­ments dom­i­nate farm meet­ings, with Snow­ball win­ning sup­port through elo­quent speech­es while Napoleon qui­et­ly builds alliances, par­tic­u­lar­ly with the sheep who dis­rupt pro­ceed­ings with mind­less slo­gans. Snow­ball, inspired by agri­cul­tur­al man­u­als, devis­es ambi­tious plans to mod­ern­ize the farm, includ­ing an elec­tri­cal wind­mill that promis­es reduced labor. Napoleon offers no alter­na­tives but sub­tly under­mines Snow­bal­l’s ideas, fore­shad­ow­ing their esca­lat­ing con­flict. The ide­o­log­i­cal divide between progress and prag­ma­tism begins to frac­ture the ani­mals’ uni­ty.

    Snow­bal­l’s wind­mill plans reach full devel­op­ment, show­cas­ing intri­cate designs drawn in a seclud­ed shed. The ani­mals mar­vel at his blue­prints, though they don’t under­stand them, while Napoleon remains con­spic­u­ous­ly opposed. In a strik­ing act of defi­ance, Napoleon uri­nates on the plans dur­ing an inspec­tion, demon­strat­ing his con­tempt for Snow­bal­l’s vision. This vul­gar rejec­tion sym­bol­izes the deep­en­ing rift between the two lead­ers and their com­pet­ing visions for Ani­mal Far­m’s future—Snowball’s tech­no­log­i­cal utopia ver­sus Napoleon’s unspec­i­fied but tra­di­tion­al approach.

    The farm splits into fac­tions over the wind­mill debate. Snow­ball argues the project will even­tu­al­ly reduce work to three days week­ly, while Napoleon insists on pri­or­i­tiz­ing imme­di­ate food pro­duc­tion. Their slo­gans divide the ani­mals, except for cyn­i­cal Ben­jamin the don­key who refus­es to engage. The chap­ter ends with this ide­o­log­i­cal stale­mate, high­light­ing how the rev­o­lu­tion’s ini­tial uni­ty has giv­en way to polar­iza­tion under com­pet­ing lead­er­ship styles—Snowball’s intel­lec­tu­al ide­al­ism ver­sus Napoleon’s cal­cu­lat­ing oppo­si­tion.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What were the signs that Mollie was becoming disloyal to Animal Farm, and what was the final evidence of her betrayal?

      Answer:
      Mollie exhibited several warning signs of disloyalty: chronic lateness, mysterious pains (despite good appetite), frequent visits to admire her reflection, and most damningly, being seen interacting with a human from Foxwood farm. The definitive proof came when Clover discovered hidden sugar lumps and ribbons in Mollie’s stall - contraband items representing human indulgence. Mollie’s eventual disappearance and reappearance in human service (wearing ribbons and enjoying sugar from a pub owner) confirmed her complete rejection of Animal Farm’s principles. This episode illustrates how material comforts can undermine revolutionary ideals.

      2. Compare and contrast Snowball’s and Napoleon’s leadership styles as demonstrated in their debates about farm management.

      Answer:
      Snowball emerges as an intellectual, innovative leader who studies agricultural science (using Jones’ books) and develops detailed plans like the windmill project. He wins support through eloquent speeches and visionary ideas about labor-saving technology. Napoleon operates more subtly - avoiding policy debates but quietly building support (especially with the sheep), dismissing Snowball’s plans without counter-proposals, and strategically waiting to undermine his rival. Their conflict manifests in opposing crop proposals (barley vs oats) and the fundamental windmill debate, showcasing their ideological divide between progressivism and pragmatic conservatism.

      3. Analyze the symbolic significance of Snowball’s windmill plans and Napoleon’s reaction to them.

      Answer:
      The windmill represents technological progress and the promise of easier labor (three-day work weeks), symbolizing Snowball’s modernist vision for Animal Farm. Napoleon’s visceral rejection - urinating on the plans - goes beyond mere disagreement; it’s a symbolic desecration of intellectualism and innovation. The detailed blueprints (covering half the floor with intricate mechanisms) contrast with Napoleon’s anti-intellectualism, foreshadowing their ideological clash. The windmill debate becomes a microcosm of larger political struggles between reformists and authoritarians, where complex ideas face destruction through crude opposition rather than reasoned debate.

      4. How does the sheep’s constant chanting of “Four legs good, two legs bad” function in the chapter’s political dynamics?

      Answer:
      The sheep’s mindless repetition serves as political manipulation, disrupting Snowball’s speeches at critical moments to benefit Napoleon. Their untimely interruptions exemplify how simplistic slogans can drown out complex policy discussions in political assemblies. The chapter reveals this isn’t random behavior but coordinated tactics (“especially liable to break into… at crucial moments”), suggesting Napoleon’s behind-the-scenes orchestration. This demonstrates early propaganda techniques in the farm’s power struggle, where rational debate gets sabotaged by repetitive dogma - a tactic employed by authoritarian figures to control discourse and suppress opposition.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Hidden under the straw was a little pile of lump sugar and several bunches of ribbon of different colours.”

      This revealing discovery about Mollie’s secret human indulgences symbolizes the betrayal of the animals’ revolutionary ideals. It shows how some individuals prioritize personal comforts over collective principles.

      2. “It had come to be accepted that the pigs, who were manifestly cleverer than the other animals, should decide all questions of farm policy, though their decisions had to be ratified by a majority vote.”

      This quote marks a crucial development in the power structure of Animal Farm, illustrating how the pigs are gradually establishing their intellectual dominance while maintaining a facade of democracy.

      3. “Snowball often won over the majority by his brilliant speeches, but Napoleon was better at canvassing support for himself in between times. He was especially successful with the sheep.”

      This contrast between Snowball’s oratory skills and Napoleon’s behind-the-scenes manipulation foreshadows their coming power struggle and highlights different approaches to leadership and control.

      4. “He walked heavily round the shed, looked closely at every detail of the plans and snuffed at them once or twice, then stood for a little while contemplating them out of the corner of his eye; then suddenly he lifted his leg, urinated over the plans, and walked out without uttering a word.”

      Napoleon’s vulgar rejection of Snowball’s windmill plans demonstrates his growing opposition and contempt for Snowball’s ideas, using physical symbolism rather than intellectual debate to make his point.

      5. “The animals formed themselves into two factions under the slogan, ‘Vote for Snowball and the three-day week’ and ‘Vote for Napoleon and the full manger.’”

      This division into factions represents the ideological split emerging on the farm, with Snowball promising technological progress and leisure, while Napoleon appeals to immediate material needs - a fundamental political dichotomy.

    Quotes

    1. “Hidden under the straw was a little pile of lump sugar and several bunches of ribbon of different colours.”

    This revealing discovery about Mollie’s secret human indulgences symbolizes the betrayal of the animals’ revolutionary ideals. It shows how some individuals prioritize personal comforts over collective principles.

    2. “It had come to be accepted that the pigs, who were manifestly cleverer than the other animals, should decide all questions of farm policy, though their decisions had to be ratified by a majority vote.”

    This quote marks a crucial development in the power structure of Animal Farm, illustrating how the pigs are gradually establishing their intellectual dominance while maintaining a facade of democracy.

    3. “Snowball often won over the majority by his brilliant speeches, but Napoleon was better at canvassing support for himself in between times. He was especially successful with the sheep.”

    This contrast between Snowball’s oratory skills and Napoleon’s behind-the-scenes manipulation foreshadows their coming power struggle and highlights different approaches to leadership and control.

    4. “He walked heavily round the shed, looked closely at every detail of the plans and snuffed at them once or twice, then stood for a little while contemplating them out of the corner of his eye; then suddenly he lifted his leg, urinated over the plans, and walked out without uttering a word.”

    Napoleon’s vulgar rejection of Snowball’s windmill plans demonstrates his growing opposition and contempt for Snowball’s ideas, using physical symbolism rather than intellectual debate to make his point.

    5. “The animals formed themselves into two factions under the slogan, ‘Vote for Snowball and the three-day week’ and ‘Vote for Napoleon and the full manger.’”

    This division into factions represents the ideological split emerging on the farm, with Snowball promising technological progress and leisure, while Napoleon appeals to immediate material needs - a fundamental political dichotomy.

    FAQs

    1. What were the signs that Mollie was becoming disloyal to Animal Farm, and what was the final evidence of her betrayal?

    Answer:
    Mollie exhibited several warning signs of disloyalty: chronic lateness, mysterious pains (despite good appetite), frequent visits to admire her reflection, and most damningly, being seen interacting with a human from Foxwood farm. The definitive proof came when Clover discovered hidden sugar lumps and ribbons in Mollie’s stall - contraband items representing human indulgence. Mollie’s eventual disappearance and reappearance in human service (wearing ribbons and enjoying sugar from a pub owner) confirmed her complete rejection of Animal Farm’s principles. This episode illustrates how material comforts can undermine revolutionary ideals.

    2. Compare and contrast Snowball’s and Napoleon’s leadership styles as demonstrated in their debates about farm management.

    Answer:
    Snowball emerges as an intellectual, innovative leader who studies agricultural science (using Jones’ books) and develops detailed plans like the windmill project. He wins support through eloquent speeches and visionary ideas about labor-saving technology. Napoleon operates more subtly - avoiding policy debates but quietly building support (especially with the sheep), dismissing Snowball’s plans without counter-proposals, and strategically waiting to undermine his rival. Their conflict manifests in opposing crop proposals (barley vs oats) and the fundamental windmill debate, showcasing their ideological divide between progressivism and pragmatic conservatism.

    3. Analyze the symbolic significance of Snowball’s windmill plans and Napoleon’s reaction to them.

    Answer:
    The windmill represents technological progress and the promise of easier labor (three-day work weeks), symbolizing Snowball’s modernist vision for Animal Farm. Napoleon’s visceral rejection - urinating on the plans - goes beyond mere disagreement; it’s a symbolic desecration of intellectualism and innovation. The detailed blueprints (covering half the floor with intricate mechanisms) contrast with Napoleon’s anti-intellectualism, foreshadowing their ideological clash. The windmill debate becomes a microcosm of larger political struggles between reformists and authoritarians, where complex ideas face destruction through crude opposition rather than reasoned debate.

    4. How does the sheep’s constant chanting of “Four legs good, two legs bad” function in the chapter’s political dynamics?

    Answer:
    The sheep’s mindless repetition serves as political manipulation, disrupting Snowball’s speeches at critical moments to benefit Napoleon. Their untimely interruptions exemplify how simplistic slogans can drown out complex policy discussions in political assemblies. The chapter reveals this isn’t random behavior but coordinated tactics (“especially liable to break into… at crucial moments”), suggesting Napoleon’s behind-the-scenes orchestration. This demonstrates early propaganda techniques in the farm’s power struggle, where rational debate gets sabotaged by repetitive dogma - a tactic employed by authoritarian figures to control discourse and suppress opposition.

    Note