Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of American Assassin
    Adventure FictionPolitical FictionThriller

    American Assassin

    by Flynn, Vince
    “American Assassin” by Vince Flynn is a gripping thriller that introduces Mitch Rapp, a highly skilled counterterrorism operative. The novel follows Rapp’s recruitment and training by the CIA after a personal tragedy fuels his desire for vengeance. Tasked with infiltrating and dismantling terrorist networks, Rapp’s relentless pursuit of justice highlights themes of patriotism, revenge, and moral ambiguity. Flynn’s meticulous research and fast-paced narrative offer a realistic portrayal of covert operations, making it a standout in the espionage genre. The book’s significance lies in its exploration of the psychological toll of warfare and the complexities of modern counterterrorism efforts.
    PreviousNext
    American Assassin

    Chapter 47

    by Flynn, Vince

    The chap­ter opens with a tense scene where Rapp, an oper­a­tive, threat­ens a banker named Dorf­man by hold­ing a knife to his dog’s eye. Dorf­man, emo­tion­al­ly dis­traught, relents and opens his safe to reveal doc­u­ments and items link­ing him to Nazi ties and ter­ror­ist financ­ing. Rapp and his part­ner Hur­ley con­front Dorf­man about his com­plic­i­ty in aid­ing ter­ror­ists, empha­siz­ing his mis­placed priorities—showing more con­cern for his dog than his actions. The scene cul­mi­nates in Hur­ley exe­cut­ing Dorf­man, cold­ly stat­ing it’s part of his job, before they leave with the stolen files, head­ing to Zurich for their next mis­sion.

    Mean­while, the nar­ra­tive shifts to Moscow, where Ivanov, a high-rank­ing SVR offi­cer, reflects on a lucra­tive gas deal he facil­i­tat­ed. He com­pares post-Sovi­et Rus­sia to *The God­fa­ther*, high­light­ing the per­va­sive cor­rup­tion and pow­er dynam­ics. Ivanov prides him­self on nav­i­gat­ing this chaot­ic sys­tem, lever­ag­ing his posi­tion to extract prof­its from for­eign investors while jus­ti­fy­ing his actions as pro­tect­ing Russia’s inter­ests. His cyn­i­cal world­view under­scores the blend of crim­i­nal­i­ty and bureau­cra­cy defin­ing the new Russ­ian econ­o­my.

    Ivanov’s per­spec­tive reveals the stark con­trast between the inef­fi­cien­cies of the Sovi­et era and the cut­throat cap­i­tal­ism of mod­ern Rus­sia. He dis­miss­es the old sys­tem as doomed by incom­pe­tence, while the cur­rent one rewards ruth­less­ness. Despite his self-jus­ti­fi­ca­tion, Ivanov embod­ies the cor­rup­tion he cri­tiques, demand­ing a 10% stake in all deals. The chap­ter paints a grim pic­ture of a soci­ety where pow­er and wealth are con­cen­trat­ed among a few, with Ivanov as a key play­er in this exploita­tive game.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Ivanov’s hun­gover morn­ing, where his assis­tant Shvets attends to him. Their inter­ac­tion hints at Ivanov’s dete­ri­o­rat­ing con­trol and the ris­ing influ­ence of a younger, more capa­ble gen­er­a­tion. As Ivanov pre­pares for his next move—possibly involv­ing a trip to Beirut—the ten­sion between his arro­gance and the chang­ing land­scape fore­shad­ows poten­tial chal­lenges to his author­i­ty. The jux­ta­po­si­tion of Rapp’s bru­tal effi­cien­cy and Ivanov’s cor­rupt machi­na­tions under­scores the novel’s themes of pow­er, moral­i­ty, and sur­vival in a ruth­less world.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Rapp use psychological tactics to extract information from Dorfman, and what does this reveal about Dorfman’s priorities?

      Answer:
      Rapp employs brutal psychological pressure by threatening to harm Dorfman’s poodle, holding a knife near its eye while forcing the banker to choose which eye to sacrifice. This extreme tactic succeeds when Dorfman breaks and opens the safe to save his dog. The scene reveals Dorfman’s twisted priorities—he shows more emotional attachment to his pet than to his wife or the consequences of aiding terrorists. Rapp later remarks on this irony, noting Dorfman might have reconsidered collaborating with terrorists if they targeted dogs instead of civilians. The method underscores Rapp’s willingness to cross moral boundaries for mission success, while also exposing Dorfman’s moral bankruptcy.

      2. Analyze the symbolic significance of the Nazi artifacts found in Dorfman’s safe. How does this detail deepen the reader’s understanding of the character and the novel’s themes?

      Answer:
      The SS dagger and insignia discovered in Dorfman’s safe serve as a damning indictment of his character, linking him to historical evil while reinforcing his present-day corruption. Hurley’s disgust (“Nazi prick”) frames Dorfman as a continuation of systemic oppression—a man who profits from violence, whether by aiding past fascism or modern terrorism. This detail amplifies the novel’s exploration of moral ambiguity: Rapp’s team commits violence (e.g., killing Dorfman) to combat worse evils, yet Dorfman embodies how ideologies of hatred persist in new forms. The artifacts also justify Hurley’s eventual execution of Dorfman, framing it as poetic justice rather than mere expediency.

      3. Compare Ivanov’s worldview in the Moscow section with the actions of Rapp’s team in the previous scene. What do both scenarios suggest about power and corruption?

      Answer:
      Both segments depict power as inherently corrupt but diverge in their moral framing. Ivanov rationalizes his exploitation of post-Soviet chaos as a “natural extension” of state security work, boasting about his 10% cut of deals like a mafia boss. He romanticizes this corruption by comparing it to The Godfather, viewing himself as a necessary arbiter in a lawless system. Conversely, Rapp’s team operates outside legal frameworks (torture, assassination) but targets unambiguous villains like Dorfman. Both scenarios reveal systems where traditional justice fails: Rapp bypasses bureaucracy to stop terrorists, while Ivanov thrives in a vacuum of accountability. The juxtaposition questions whether corruption serves order (Ivanov) or justice (Rapp).

      4. How does the chapter use contrasting imagery to highlight the brutality of Rapp’s mission versus Ivanov’s luxurious corruption? Provide specific examples.

      Answer:
      The chapter juxtaposes visceral violence with sleek decadence to underscore different forms of power. Rapp’s scene is steeped in primal imagery: the “puddle of blood” spreading from Dorfman’s head, the dog’s whimpering, and the crude threat of eye-gouging. In contrast, Ivanov’s world features “seven-figure retainers,” “long tanned fingers,” and vodka-fueled dealmaking. Even his headache is described with clinical detachment (“an irritating beam”). These contrasts emphasize Rapp’s gritty, hands-on violence versus Ivanov’s detached, systemic corruption. Both men operate outside norms, but Rapp’s physical brutality contrasts sharply with Ivanov’s polished exploitation—a dichotomy that critiques power structures at both street and elite levels.

      5. Critical Thinking: Evaluate Hurley’s decision to execute Dorfman after obtaining the files. Was this morally justifiable, strategically necessary, or both? Support your answer with text evidence.

      Answer:
      Hurley’s execution of Dorfman blends strategic pragmatism with moral retribution. Strategically, killing Dorfman eliminates a witness who could expose their operation (“Let’s get the fuck out of here” implies haste to avoid detection). Morally, Hurley frames it as justice for Dorfman’s Nazi ties and terrorist financing (“You knew exactly who you were dealing with”). However, the act remains ethically ambiguous—Rapp hesitates earlier, suggesting discomfort with torture, but neither questions the murder. The text justifies it through Dorfman’s irredeemability (his Nazi relics and callousness), yet the cold efficiency (“squeezed the trigger”) mirrors the very ruthlessness they oppose. This complexity forces readers to grapple with counterterrorism’s moral costs.

    Quotes

    • 1. ““Left eye or right eye? You choose.””

      This chilling quote demonstrates Rapp’s ruthless interrogation tactics, using psychological torture (threatening the banker’s dog) to achieve his objectives. It reveals the moral ambiguity of counterterrorism operations.

      2. ““You’re a liar.” / “That’s for certain,” Hurley said as he stood with the bag full of files and disks.”

      This exchange captures the chapter’s central conflict - exposing the hypocrisy of financiers who claim ignorance while knowingly supporting terrorism. The blunt accusation underscores the moral justification for their violent actions.

      3. ““The two systems were not, at the end of the day, all that different from each other. Both were corrupt to the core, and both systems served to line the pockets of the powerful.””

      This insightful comparison between Soviet communism and post-Soviet capitalism reveals the novel’s cynical worldview about power structures. Ivanov’s reflection shows how corruption persists regardless of political systems.

      4. ““It was The Godfather, the Wild West, and 1920s gangster America all rolled into one.””

      This vivid metaphor encapsulates the lawless environment of post-Soviet Russia, where Ivanov thrives. The comparison to iconic criminal eras emphasizes the chaotic, opportunistic nature of the new economic order.

      5. ““Someone needed to keep track of all these foreign investors and make sure they weren’t stealing the Motherland’s natural resources.””

      This quote reveals Ivanov’s self-justification for his corrupt practices, showing how he rationalizes exploitation as patriotism. It demonstrates the novel’s exploration of how people cloak self-interest in nationalist rhetoric.

    Quotes

    1. ““Left eye or right eye? You choose.””

    This chilling quote demonstrates Rapp’s ruthless interrogation tactics, using psychological torture (threatening the banker’s dog) to achieve his objectives. It reveals the moral ambiguity of counterterrorism operations.

    2. ““You’re a liar.” / “That’s for certain,” Hurley said as he stood with the bag full of files and disks.”

    This exchange captures the chapter’s central conflict - exposing the hypocrisy of financiers who claim ignorance while knowingly supporting terrorism. The blunt accusation underscores the moral justification for their violent actions.

    3. ““The two systems were not, at the end of the day, all that different from each other. Both were corrupt to the core, and both systems served to line the pockets of the powerful.””

    This insightful comparison between Soviet communism and post-Soviet capitalism reveals the novel’s cynical worldview about power structures. Ivanov’s reflection shows how corruption persists regardless of political systems.

    4. ““It was The Godfather, the Wild West, and 1920s gangster America all rolled into one.””

    This vivid metaphor encapsulates the lawless environment of post-Soviet Russia, where Ivanov thrives. The comparison to iconic criminal eras emphasizes the chaotic, opportunistic nature of the new economic order.

    5. ““Someone needed to keep track of all these foreign investors and make sure they weren’t stealing the Motherland’s natural resources.””

    This quote reveals Ivanov’s self-justification for his corrupt practices, showing how he rationalizes exploitation as patriotism. It demonstrates the novel’s exploration of how people cloak self-interest in nationalist rhetoric.

    FAQs

    1. How does Rapp use psychological tactics to extract information from Dorfman, and what does this reveal about Dorfman’s priorities?

    Answer:
    Rapp employs brutal psychological pressure by threatening to harm Dorfman’s poodle, holding a knife near its eye while forcing the banker to choose which eye to sacrifice. This extreme tactic succeeds when Dorfman breaks and opens the safe to save his dog. The scene reveals Dorfman’s twisted priorities—he shows more emotional attachment to his pet than to his wife or the consequences of aiding terrorists. Rapp later remarks on this irony, noting Dorfman might have reconsidered collaborating with terrorists if they targeted dogs instead of civilians. The method underscores Rapp’s willingness to cross moral boundaries for mission success, while also exposing Dorfman’s moral bankruptcy.

    2. Analyze the symbolic significance of the Nazi artifacts found in Dorfman’s safe. How does this detail deepen the reader’s understanding of the character and the novel’s themes?

    Answer:
    The SS dagger and insignia discovered in Dorfman’s safe serve as a damning indictment of his character, linking him to historical evil while reinforcing his present-day corruption. Hurley’s disgust (“Nazi prick”) frames Dorfman as a continuation of systemic oppression—a man who profits from violence, whether by aiding past fascism or modern terrorism. This detail amplifies the novel’s exploration of moral ambiguity: Rapp’s team commits violence (e.g., killing Dorfman) to combat worse evils, yet Dorfman embodies how ideologies of hatred persist in new forms. The artifacts also justify Hurley’s eventual execution of Dorfman, framing it as poetic justice rather than mere expediency.

    3. Compare Ivanov’s worldview in the Moscow section with the actions of Rapp’s team in the previous scene. What do both scenarios suggest about power and corruption?

    Answer:
    Both segments depict power as inherently corrupt but diverge in their moral framing. Ivanov rationalizes his exploitation of post-Soviet chaos as a “natural extension” of state security work, boasting about his 10% cut of deals like a mafia boss. He romanticizes this corruption by comparing it to The Godfather, viewing himself as a necessary arbiter in a lawless system. Conversely, Rapp’s team operates outside legal frameworks (torture, assassination) but targets unambiguous villains like Dorfman. Both scenarios reveal systems where traditional justice fails: Rapp bypasses bureaucracy to stop terrorists, while Ivanov thrives in a vacuum of accountability. The juxtaposition questions whether corruption serves order (Ivanov) or justice (Rapp).

    4. How does the chapter use contrasting imagery to highlight the brutality of Rapp’s mission versus Ivanov’s luxurious corruption? Provide specific examples.

    Answer:
    The chapter juxtaposes visceral violence with sleek decadence to underscore different forms of power. Rapp’s scene is steeped in primal imagery: the “puddle of blood” spreading from Dorfman’s head, the dog’s whimpering, and the crude threat of eye-gouging. In contrast, Ivanov’s world features “seven-figure retainers,” “long tanned fingers,” and vodka-fueled dealmaking. Even his headache is described with clinical detachment (“an irritating beam”). These contrasts emphasize Rapp’s gritty, hands-on violence versus Ivanov’s detached, systemic corruption. Both men operate outside norms, but Rapp’s physical brutality contrasts sharply with Ivanov’s polished exploitation—a dichotomy that critiques power structures at both street and elite levels.

    5. Critical Thinking: Evaluate Hurley’s decision to execute Dorfman after obtaining the files. Was this morally justifiable, strategically necessary, or both? Support your answer with text evidence.

    Answer:
    Hurley’s execution of Dorfman blends strategic pragmatism with moral retribution. Strategically, killing Dorfman eliminates a witness who could expose their operation (“Let’s get the fuck out of here” implies haste to avoid detection). Morally, Hurley frames it as justice for Dorfman’s Nazi ties and terrorist financing (“You knew exactly who you were dealing with”). However, the act remains ethically ambiguous—Rapp hesitates earlier, suggesting discomfort with torture, but neither questions the murder. The text justifies it through Dorfman’s irredeemability (his Nazi relics and callousness), yet the cold efficiency (“squeezed the trigger”) mirrors the very ruthlessness they oppose. This complexity forces readers to grapple with counterterrorism’s moral costs.

    Note