Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of American Assassin
    Adventure FictionPolitical FictionThriller

    American Assassin

    by Flynn, Vince
    “American Assassin” by Vince Flynn is a gripping thriller that introduces Mitch Rapp, a highly skilled counterterrorism operative. The novel follows Rapp’s recruitment and training by the CIA after a personal tragedy fuels his desire for vengeance. Tasked with infiltrating and dismantling terrorist networks, Rapp’s relentless pursuit of justice highlights themes of patriotism, revenge, and moral ambiguity. Flynn’s meticulous research and fast-paced narrative offer a realistic portrayal of covert operations, making it a standout in the espionage genre. The book’s significance lies in its exploration of the psychological toll of warfare and the complexities of modern counterterrorism efforts.
    PreviousNext
    American Assassin

    Chapter 45

    by Flynn, Vince

    In Chap­ter 45, CIA oper­a­tive Mitch Rapp and his col­league Hur­ley con­front a banker named Dorf­man, who has been aid­ing ter­ror­ists. To extract infor­ma­tion, Rapp threat­ens Dorfman’s poo­dle with a knife, exploit­ing the banker’s emo­tion­al attach­ment to the ani­mal. Dorf­man relents and opens his safe, reveal­ing Nazi mem­o­ra­bil­ia and evi­dence of his col­lab­o­ra­tion with ter­ror­ists. Hur­ley retrieves crit­i­cal files and disks, con­firm­ing their sus­pi­cions. After obtain­ing the nec­es­sary intel­li­gence, Hur­ley exe­cutes Dorf­man, cold­ly jus­ti­fy­ing it as part of their mis­sion. The chap­ter high­lights Rapp’s moral con­flict and Hurley’s ruth­less effi­cien­cy as they pre­pare to move on to Zurich for their next oper­a­tion.

    The nar­ra­tive shifts to Moscow, where SVR offi­cer Ivanov reflects on a lucra­tive gas deal he secured through a mix of nego­ti­a­tion and intim­i­da­tion. Ivanov draws par­al­lels between the cor­rupt sys­tems of post-Sovi­et Rus­sia and the mafia dynam­ics depict­ed in *The God­fa­ther*. He prides him­self on nav­i­gat­ing this chaot­ic envi­ron­ment, offer­ing for­eign investors a way to bypass bureau­crat­ic inef­fi­cien­cies for a cut of their prof­its. Ivanov’s self-jus­ti­fi­ca­tion reveals his oppor­tunis­tic mind­set, as he views his role as both a pro­tec­tor of Russia’s resources and a ben­e­fi­cia­ry of its law­less­ness.

    Ivanov’s world is con­trast­ed with the rem­nants of Sovi­et inef­fi­cien­cy, where tal­ent was sti­fled and cor­rup­tion ram­pant. He dis­miss­es the old sys­tem as doomed by incom­pe­tence, while embrac­ing the new era’s cut­throat cap­i­tal­ism. How­ev­er, he acknowl­edges the lin­ger­ing cor­rup­tion in courts, police, and secu­ri­ty ser­vices, which he exploits to his advan­tage. Ivanov’s dis­dain for “Jew lawyers” and his insis­tence on a 10% own­er­ship stake under­score his arro­gance and enti­tle­ment. His char­ac­ter embod­ies the moral ambi­gu­i­ty of a state secu­ri­ty offi­cer turned prof­i­teer.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Ivanov’s assis­tant, Shvets, enter­ing the scene, high­light­ing the gen­er­a­tional divide between Ivanov and the younger, more pol­ished oper­a­tives. Ivanov’s hang­over and irri­ta­ble demeanor con­trast with Shvets’ com­posed appear­ance, sym­bol­iz­ing the shift­ing pow­er dynam­ics in Russia’s intel­li­gence appa­ra­tus. The chap­ter sets the stage for fur­ther intrigue, as Ivanov pre­pares to send Shvets to Beirut, hint­ing at upcom­ing oper­a­tions. The dual nar­ra­tives of Rapp’s mis­sion and Ivanov’s schem­ing cre­ate a tense, inter­con­nect­ed plot­line.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Rapp use psychological tactics to extract information from Dorfman, and what does this reveal about Dorfman’s priorities?

      Answer:
      Rapp employs psychological torture by threatening Dorfman’s poodle with a knife, forcing the banker to choose which eye to sacrifice. This extreme tactic exploits Dorfman’s emotional attachment to his dog, which proves stronger than his loyalty to his wife or resistance to coercion. When Dorfman relents and opens the safe to save the dog, it reveals his skewed priorities—valuing an animal over human lives or his own safety. The scene underscores Rapp’s understanding of leverage, as well as Dorfman’s moral ambiguity as a Nazi sympathizer who aids terrorists yet displays vulnerability through his pet.

      2. Analyze Hurley’s statement, “You’re a good Nazi,” in the context of post-Soviet Russia’s corruption as described later in the chapter. How do both sections critique systemic moral decay?

      Answer:
      Hurley’s sarcastic remark highlights Dorfman’s complicity in terrorism despite his “just a businessman” defense, mirroring Ivanov’s rationalization of corruption in Moscow. Both sections expose how systems (Nazi collaboration, post-Soviet capitalism) enable amorality under the guise of pragmatism. Ivanov justifies his extortion as a “natural extension” of state security, paralleling Dorfman’s banking for terrorists. The chapter critiques how power structures—whether Soviet bureaucracy or gangster capitalism—reward exploitation, with Ivanov even romanticizing The Godfather as a blueprint for control. Both scenarios reveal how individuals weaponize systemic flaws for personal gain.

      3. Compare Rapp and Ivanov’s methods of achieving objectives. What distinguishes their approaches despite both using intimidation?

      Answer:
      Rapp employs direct, physical intimidation (knife threats, execution) for a mission-driven goal (retrieving terrorist funds), prioritizing efficiency over cruelty. Ivanov, however, operates through calculated manipulation—leveraging legal loopholes, bribes, and implied threats (e.g., sending enforcers to “persuade” business rivals). While both use fear, Rapp’s violence is tactical and contained, whereas Ivanov’s is systemic, blending state authority with criminal enterprise. Rapp answers to covert ops; Ivanov corrupts institutions. The distinction lies in Rapp’s external enforcement versus Ivanov’s institutionalized corruption, reflecting their environments (counterterrorism vs. oligarchy).

      4. How does the chapter portray the paradox of post-Soviet Russia’s “dynamic” economy? Connect Ivanov’s perspective to historical context.

      Answer:
      Ivanov celebrates Russia’s “dynamic” post-Soviet economy as a free-for-all where “money was to be made everywhere,” yet admits it combines The Godfather, Wild West lawlessness, and Soviet-era corruption. This paradox lies in the tension between opportunity and predation: startups flourish, but only if they pay Ivanov’s 10% “tax.” The chapter critiques how Soviet inefficiency (e.g., unqualified officials) evolved into kleptocracy, where former KGB agents like Ivanov repurpose state power for personal profit. His disdain for “Jew lawyers” and glorification of The Godfather underscore how nostalgia for authoritarian control persists beneath capitalist veneers.

      5. Evaluate the ethical implications of Rapp’s dog-threatening tactic. Is his hesitation justified, or does the end (stopping terrorists) justify the means?

      Answer:
      Rapp’s momentary hesitation reveals moral conflict—he lacks “stomach” for harming an animal, unlike Hurley, who coldly executes Dorfman. The tactic works (Dorfman complies), but its ethical cost is high: it dehumanizes both victim and perpetrator. While the mission (exposing terrorist financiers) is noble, the method risks normalizing cruelty. The chapter invites reflection on counterterrorism’s moral boundaries: Is psychological torture acceptable if it saves lives? Rapp’s muttered disbelief at Dorfman’s priorities (“You care more about the dog…”) hints at his own unease, suggesting even “justified” violence carries psychological and ethical consequences.

    Quotes

    • 1. ““Left eye or right eye? You choose.””

      This chilling quote demonstrates Rapp’s ruthless interrogation tactics, showing how he exploits emotional vulnerabilities (in this case, the banker’s love for his dog) to achieve mission objectives. It sets the tone for the morally complex world of counterterrorism operations.

      2. ““You care more about that damn dog than you do your wife… don’t you?””

      This revealing statement highlights the twisted priorities Rapp discovers in his target, simultaneously exposing the banker’s moral bankruptcy while questioning the ethics of their own methods. It underscores the psychological warfare inherent in intelligence work.

      3. ““The two systems were not, at the end of the day, all that different from each other. Both were corrupt to the core, and both systems served to line the pockets of the powerful.””

      This insightful comparison between Soviet communism and post-Soviet Russian capitalism reveals the novel’s cynical perspective on power structures. Ivanov’s reflection shows how systemic corruption persists regardless of political ideology.

      4. ““It was The Godfather, the Wild West, and 1920s gangster America all rolled into one.””

      This vivid metaphor captures the lawless environment of post-Soviet Russia, where Ivanov thrives by blending state security work with organized crime tactics. It illustrates the novel’s exploration of power in transitional societies.

      5. ““Someone needed to keep track of all these foreign investors and make sure they weren’t stealing the Motherland’s natural resources. After all, he was far more deserving of the profits than some twenty-five-year-old business-school graduate.””

      This quote perfectly encapsulates Ivanov’s self-justification for corruption, showing how he rationalizes his criminal behavior as patriotic duty while revealing his resentment toward the new capitalist elite.

    Quotes

    1. ““Left eye or right eye? You choose.””

    This chilling quote demonstrates Rapp’s ruthless interrogation tactics, showing how he exploits emotional vulnerabilities (in this case, the banker’s love for his dog) to achieve mission objectives. It sets the tone for the morally complex world of counterterrorism operations.

    2. ““You care more about that damn dog than you do your wife… don’t you?””

    This revealing statement highlights the twisted priorities Rapp discovers in his target, simultaneously exposing the banker’s moral bankruptcy while questioning the ethics of their own methods. It underscores the psychological warfare inherent in intelligence work.

    3. ““The two systems were not, at the end of the day, all that different from each other. Both were corrupt to the core, and both systems served to line the pockets of the powerful.””

    This insightful comparison between Soviet communism and post-Soviet Russian capitalism reveals the novel’s cynical perspective on power structures. Ivanov’s reflection shows how systemic corruption persists regardless of political ideology.

    4. ““It was The Godfather, the Wild West, and 1920s gangster America all rolled into one.””

    This vivid metaphor captures the lawless environment of post-Soviet Russia, where Ivanov thrives by blending state security work with organized crime tactics. It illustrates the novel’s exploration of power in transitional societies.

    5. ““Someone needed to keep track of all these foreign investors and make sure they weren’t stealing the Motherland’s natural resources. After all, he was far more deserving of the profits than some twenty-five-year-old business-school graduate.””

    This quote perfectly encapsulates Ivanov’s self-justification for corruption, showing how he rationalizes his criminal behavior as patriotic duty while revealing his resentment toward the new capitalist elite.

    FAQs

    1. How does Rapp use psychological tactics to extract information from Dorfman, and what does this reveal about Dorfman’s priorities?

    Answer:
    Rapp employs psychological torture by threatening Dorfman’s poodle with a knife, forcing the banker to choose which eye to sacrifice. This extreme tactic exploits Dorfman’s emotional attachment to his dog, which proves stronger than his loyalty to his wife or resistance to coercion. When Dorfman relents and opens the safe to save the dog, it reveals his skewed priorities—valuing an animal over human lives or his own safety. The scene underscores Rapp’s understanding of leverage, as well as Dorfman’s moral ambiguity as a Nazi sympathizer who aids terrorists yet displays vulnerability through his pet.

    2. Analyze Hurley’s statement, “You’re a good Nazi,” in the context of post-Soviet Russia’s corruption as described later in the chapter. How do both sections critique systemic moral decay?

    Answer:
    Hurley’s sarcastic remark highlights Dorfman’s complicity in terrorism despite his “just a businessman” defense, mirroring Ivanov’s rationalization of corruption in Moscow. Both sections expose how systems (Nazi collaboration, post-Soviet capitalism) enable amorality under the guise of pragmatism. Ivanov justifies his extortion as a “natural extension” of state security, paralleling Dorfman’s banking for terrorists. The chapter critiques how power structures—whether Soviet bureaucracy or gangster capitalism—reward exploitation, with Ivanov even romanticizing The Godfather as a blueprint for control. Both scenarios reveal how individuals weaponize systemic flaws for personal gain.

    3. Compare Rapp and Ivanov’s methods of achieving objectives. What distinguishes their approaches despite both using intimidation?

    Answer:
    Rapp employs direct, physical intimidation (knife threats, execution) for a mission-driven goal (retrieving terrorist funds), prioritizing efficiency over cruelty. Ivanov, however, operates through calculated manipulation—leveraging legal loopholes, bribes, and implied threats (e.g., sending enforcers to “persuade” business rivals). While both use fear, Rapp’s violence is tactical and contained, whereas Ivanov’s is systemic, blending state authority with criminal enterprise. Rapp answers to covert ops; Ivanov corrupts institutions. The distinction lies in Rapp’s external enforcement versus Ivanov’s institutionalized corruption, reflecting their environments (counterterrorism vs. oligarchy).

    4. How does the chapter portray the paradox of post-Soviet Russia’s “dynamic” economy? Connect Ivanov’s perspective to historical context.

    Answer:
    Ivanov celebrates Russia’s “dynamic” post-Soviet economy as a free-for-all where “money was to be made everywhere,” yet admits it combines The Godfather, Wild West lawlessness, and Soviet-era corruption. This paradox lies in the tension between opportunity and predation: startups flourish, but only if they pay Ivanov’s 10% “tax.” The chapter critiques how Soviet inefficiency (e.g., unqualified officials) evolved into kleptocracy, where former KGB agents like Ivanov repurpose state power for personal profit. His disdain for “Jew lawyers” and glorification of The Godfather underscore how nostalgia for authoritarian control persists beneath capitalist veneers.

    5. Evaluate the ethical implications of Rapp’s dog-threatening tactic. Is his hesitation justified, or does the end (stopping terrorists) justify the means?

    Answer:
    Rapp’s momentary hesitation reveals moral conflict—he lacks “stomach” for harming an animal, unlike Hurley, who coldly executes Dorfman. The tactic works (Dorfman complies), but its ethical cost is high: it dehumanizes both victim and perpetrator. While the mission (exposing terrorist financiers) is noble, the method risks normalizing cruelty. The chapter invites reflection on counterterrorism’s moral boundaries: Is psychological torture acceptable if it saves lives? Rapp’s muttered disbelief at Dorfman’s priorities (“You care more about the dog…”) hints at his own unease, suggesting even “justified” violence carries psychological and ethical consequences.

    Note