Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of American Assassin
    Adventure FictionPolitical FictionThriller

    American Assassin

    by Flynn, Vince
    “American Assassin” by Vince Flynn is a gripping thriller that introduces Mitch Rapp, a highly skilled counterterrorism operative. The novel follows Rapp’s recruitment and training by the CIA after a personal tragedy fuels his desire for vengeance. Tasked with infiltrating and dismantling terrorist networks, Rapp’s relentless pursuit of justice highlights themes of patriotism, revenge, and moral ambiguity. Flynn’s meticulous research and fast-paced narrative offer a realistic portrayal of covert operations, making it a standout in the espionage genre. The book’s significance lies in its exploration of the psychological toll of warfare and the complexities of modern counterterrorism efforts.
    PreviousNext
    American Assassin

    Chapter 33

    by Flynn, Vince

    The chap­ter opens with a tense scene where Rapp, an oper­a­tive, threat­ens a banker named Dorf­man by hold­ing a knife to his dog’s eye to coerce him into open­ing a safe. Dorf­man, emo­tion­al­ly dis­traught, relents and reveals the com­bi­na­tion, pri­or­i­tiz­ing his dog’s safe­ty over his own life. Rapp and his part­ner Hur­ley dis­cov­er Nazi mem­o­ra­bil­ia in the safe, con­firm­ing Dorfman’s ties to extrem­ist groups. After retriev­ing crit­i­cal files and hard dri­ves, Hur­ley exe­cutes Dorf­man, cold­ly jus­ti­fy­ing it as part of their mis­sion. The scene under­scores the bru­tal effi­cien­cy of their work and the moral ambi­gu­i­ty of their meth­ods.

    The nar­ra­tive then shifts to Moscow, where Ivanov, a high-rank­ing SVR offi­cer, reflects on a lucra­tive gas deal he secured through a mix of nego­ti­a­tion and intim­i­da­tion. He likens his tac­tics to those in *The God­fa­ther*, embrac­ing cor­rup­tion as a means to pow­er in post-Sovi­et Rus­sia. Ivanov crit­i­cizes the inef­fi­cien­cies of the old com­mu­nist sys­tem, con­trast­ing it with the cur­rent cut­throat cap­i­tal­ism where only the ruth­less thrive. He takes pride in his abil­i­ty to bypass bureau­crat­ic hur­dles for for­eign investors, demand­ing a 10% stake in all deals as his non-nego­tiable fee.

    Ivanov’s world­view is fur­ther explored as he jus­ti­fies his actions as nec­es­sary for pro­tect­ing Russia’s resources from exploita­tion by out­siders. He sees him­self as a gate­keep­er, more deserv­ing of wealth than young, inex­pe­ri­enced busi­ness­men. The chap­ter high­lights the par­al­lels between orga­nized crime and state pow­er in Rus­sia, with Ivanov posi­tion­ing him­self as a key play­er in this chaot­ic land­scape. His arro­gance is pal­pa­ble as he dis­miss­es com­peti­tors and rev­els in his influ­ence, though his hang­over from a night of cel­e­brat­ing hints at his vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Ivanov’s assis­tant, Shvets, enter­ing the office and sub­tly prob­ing his boss’s con­di­tion. Ivanov, irri­ta­ble and in pain, demands water and aspirin, resist­ing the urge to drink vod­ka to numb his headache. Shvets men­tions final­iz­ing the gas deal con­tracts and inquires about an upcom­ing mis­sion to Beirut, hint­ing at the next phase of their oper­a­tions. The inter­ac­tion under­scores the hier­ar­chi­cal and manip­u­la­tive dynam­ics with­in Ivanov’s world, where loy­al­ty and oppor­tunism coex­ist. The chap­ter sets the stage for fur­ther intrigue, blend­ing espi­onage with crim­i­nal enter­prise.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Rapp use psychological tactics to extract information from Dorfman, and what does this reveal about Dorfman’s priorities?

      Answer:
      Rapp employs psychological pressure by threatening Dorfman’s poodle with a knife, forcing him to choose which eye to pierce. This cruel tactic exploits Dorfman’s emotional attachment to his dog, revealing that he prioritizes the animal over his own safety or even his wife’s well-being. When Dorfman finally relents and opens the safe to save the dog, it underscores his skewed moral compass—he is willing to protect his pet but aids terrorists financially. The scene also highlights Rapp’s calculated ruthlessness, as he recognizes the dog’s value as leverage despite his personal discomfort with the act (e.g., hesitating and glancing at Hurley for approval).

      2. Compare the corruption in post-Soviet Russia (as described by Ivanov) to the Nazi-collaborator banker Dorfman. How do both systems enable unethical behavior?

      Answer:
      Ivanov critiques post-Soviet Russia as a hybrid of mafia-like power structures (“The Godfather”) and bureaucratic inefficiency, where bribes and threats replace legal processes. He profits by “solving problems” for foreign investors, mirroring Dorfman’s role in facilitating terrorism through banking. Both systems thrive on exploitation: Ivanov leverages his SVR authority for personal gain, while Dorfman hides behind being “just a businessman” to justify laundering money for terrorists. The chapter draws parallels between historical Nazi collaboration (symbolized by Dorfman’s SS dagger) and modern Russian corruption, showing how power vacuums incentivize amorality. Ivanov even rationalizes his actions as protecting Russia’s resources, much like Dorfman claims ignorance of his clients’ atrocities.

      3. Analyze Hurley’s decision to kill Dorfman after obtaining the files. Was this ethically justifiable, and what might it foreshadow about the protagonists’ methods?

      Answer:
      Hurley’s execution of Dorfman is framed as pragmatic—eliminating a witness and punishing a Nazi collaborator—but raises ethical questions. While Dorfman’s crimes (aiding terrorists) are severe, his murder is extrajudicial, suggesting the operatives prioritize mission success over due process. Hurley’s quip (“I’m only doing my job”) echoes Dorfman’s deflection of responsibility, ironically aligning their mindsets. This foreshadows the team’s willingness to cross moral lines for intelligence, as seen later in Zurich. The act also contrasts with Rapp’s hesitation during the dog threat, hinting at future conflicts between Hurley’s ruthlessness and Rapp’s evolving moral boundaries.

      4. How does Ivanov’s worldview reflect the broader themes of power and corruption in the chapter?

      Answer:
      Ivanov embodies the chapter’s critique of systemic corruption. He glorifies power dynamics from The Godfather, comparing Russia’s post-Soviet chaos to organized crime, where influence trumps legality. His disdain for “Jew lawyers” and pride in his 10% cut reveal a predatory mindset masked as patriotism (“protecting the Motherland’s resources”). The chapter juxtaposes his cynical opportunism with Dorfman’s greed, illustrating how both capitalist and authoritarian systems breed exploitation. Ivanov’s headache and vodka cravings symbolize the unsustainable nature of such corruption—his physical decay mirrors the moral decay of the systems he champions.

      5. What role does symbolism play in the chapter, particularly with the SS dagger and the poodle?

      Answer:
      The SS dagger symbolizes Dorfman’s hidden Nazi ties and moral rot, contrasting with his affection for the poodle—a breed often associated with vanity. This irony underscores his hypocrisy: he cherishes his dog but enables violence against humans. Similarly, Ivanov’s Godfather references frame power as performative, where brutality (like Rapp’s knife threat) is transactional. The poodle also serves as a metaphor for Western decadence, as Dorfman prioritizes it over his wife or moral accountability. These symbols reinforce the chapter’s exploration of how individuals and systems disguise corruption behind superficial loyalties (to pets, ideology, or profit).

    Quotes

    • 1. ““Left eye or right eye? You choose.””

      This chilling quote captures Rapp’s brutal interrogation tactic, using the threat to a dog’s eyes to break Dorfman’s resistance. It exemplifies the morally ambiguous methods employed in counterterrorism operations and the psychological warfare involved.

      2. ““You care more about that damn dog than you do your wife… don’t you?””

      This revealing line highlights the twisted priorities of their target, Dorfman, while also underscoring Rapp’s disgust at the banker’s moral bankruptcy. It serves as a pivotal moment that exposes the character dynamics and motivations.

      3. ““The two systems were not, at the end of the day, all that different from each other. Both were corrupt to the core, and both systems served to line the pockets of the powerful.””

      This insightful comparison between Soviet-era Russia and post-collapse capitalism provides a scathing critique of systemic corruption. Ivanov’s reflection represents a key thematic element about power structures and their inherent flaws.

      4. ““It was The Godfather, the Wild West, and 1920s gangster America all rolled into one.””

      This vivid metaphor perfectly captures the chaotic state of post-Soviet Russia as described through Ivanov’s perspective. It’s significant for understanding the novel’s portrayal of modern Russia as a lawless frontier where power and connections rule.

      5. ““The 10 percent ownership stake was non-negotiable.””

      This blunt statement reveals Ivanov’s business philosophy and the unapologetic corruption in his operations. It’s a telling detail that shows how former Soviet officials transitioned into capitalist oligarchs while maintaining their authoritarian approaches.

    Quotes

    1. ““Left eye or right eye? You choose.””

    This chilling quote captures Rapp’s brutal interrogation tactic, using the threat to a dog’s eyes to break Dorfman’s resistance. It exemplifies the morally ambiguous methods employed in counterterrorism operations and the psychological warfare involved.

    2. ““You care more about that damn dog than you do your wife… don’t you?””

    This revealing line highlights the twisted priorities of their target, Dorfman, while also underscoring Rapp’s disgust at the banker’s moral bankruptcy. It serves as a pivotal moment that exposes the character dynamics and motivations.

    3. ““The two systems were not, at the end of the day, all that different from each other. Both were corrupt to the core, and both systems served to line the pockets of the powerful.””

    This insightful comparison between Soviet-era Russia and post-collapse capitalism provides a scathing critique of systemic corruption. Ivanov’s reflection represents a key thematic element about power structures and their inherent flaws.

    4. ““It was The Godfather, the Wild West, and 1920s gangster America all rolled into one.””

    This vivid metaphor perfectly captures the chaotic state of post-Soviet Russia as described through Ivanov’s perspective. It’s significant for understanding the novel’s portrayal of modern Russia as a lawless frontier where power and connections rule.

    5. ““The 10 percent ownership stake was non-negotiable.””

    This blunt statement reveals Ivanov’s business philosophy and the unapologetic corruption in his operations. It’s a telling detail that shows how former Soviet officials transitioned into capitalist oligarchs while maintaining their authoritarian approaches.

    FAQs

    1. How does Rapp use psychological tactics to extract information from Dorfman, and what does this reveal about Dorfman’s priorities?

    Answer:
    Rapp employs psychological pressure by threatening Dorfman’s poodle with a knife, forcing him to choose which eye to pierce. This cruel tactic exploits Dorfman’s emotional attachment to his dog, revealing that he prioritizes the animal over his own safety or even his wife’s well-being. When Dorfman finally relents and opens the safe to save the dog, it underscores his skewed moral compass—he is willing to protect his pet but aids terrorists financially. The scene also highlights Rapp’s calculated ruthlessness, as he recognizes the dog’s value as leverage despite his personal discomfort with the act (e.g., hesitating and glancing at Hurley for approval).

    2. Compare the corruption in post-Soviet Russia (as described by Ivanov) to the Nazi-collaborator banker Dorfman. How do both systems enable unethical behavior?

    Answer:
    Ivanov critiques post-Soviet Russia as a hybrid of mafia-like power structures (“The Godfather”) and bureaucratic inefficiency, where bribes and threats replace legal processes. He profits by “solving problems” for foreign investors, mirroring Dorfman’s role in facilitating terrorism through banking. Both systems thrive on exploitation: Ivanov leverages his SVR authority for personal gain, while Dorfman hides behind being “just a businessman” to justify laundering money for terrorists. The chapter draws parallels between historical Nazi collaboration (symbolized by Dorfman’s SS dagger) and modern Russian corruption, showing how power vacuums incentivize amorality. Ivanov even rationalizes his actions as protecting Russia’s resources, much like Dorfman claims ignorance of his clients’ atrocities.

    3. Analyze Hurley’s decision to kill Dorfman after obtaining the files. Was this ethically justifiable, and what might it foreshadow about the protagonists’ methods?

    Answer:
    Hurley’s execution of Dorfman is framed as pragmatic—eliminating a witness and punishing a Nazi collaborator—but raises ethical questions. While Dorfman’s crimes (aiding terrorists) are severe, his murder is extrajudicial, suggesting the operatives prioritize mission success over due process. Hurley’s quip (“I’m only doing my job”) echoes Dorfman’s deflection of responsibility, ironically aligning their mindsets. This foreshadows the team’s willingness to cross moral lines for intelligence, as seen later in Zurich. The act also contrasts with Rapp’s hesitation during the dog threat, hinting at future conflicts between Hurley’s ruthlessness and Rapp’s evolving moral boundaries.

    4. How does Ivanov’s worldview reflect the broader themes of power and corruption in the chapter?

    Answer:
    Ivanov embodies the chapter’s critique of systemic corruption. He glorifies power dynamics from The Godfather, comparing Russia’s post-Soviet chaos to organized crime, where influence trumps legality. His disdain for “Jew lawyers” and pride in his 10% cut reveal a predatory mindset masked as patriotism (“protecting the Motherland’s resources”). The chapter juxtaposes his cynical opportunism with Dorfman’s greed, illustrating how both capitalist and authoritarian systems breed exploitation. Ivanov’s headache and vodka cravings symbolize the unsustainable nature of such corruption—his physical decay mirrors the moral decay of the systems he champions.

    5. What role does symbolism play in the chapter, particularly with the SS dagger and the poodle?

    Answer:
    The SS dagger symbolizes Dorfman’s hidden Nazi ties and moral rot, contrasting with his affection for the poodle—a breed often associated with vanity. This irony underscores his hypocrisy: he cherishes his dog but enables violence against humans. Similarly, Ivanov’s Godfather references frame power as performative, where brutality (like Rapp’s knife threat) is transactional. The poodle also serves as a metaphor for Western decadence, as Dorfman prioritizes it over his wife or moral accountability. These symbols reinforce the chapter’s exploration of how individuals and systems disguise corruption behind superficial loyalties (to pets, ideology, or profit).

    Note