Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of American Assassin
    Adventure FictionPolitical FictionThriller

    American Assassin

    by Flynn, Vince
    “American Assassin” by Vince Flynn is a gripping thriller that introduces Mitch Rapp, a highly skilled counterterrorism operative. The novel follows Rapp’s recruitment and training by the CIA after a personal tragedy fuels his desire for vengeance. Tasked with infiltrating and dismantling terrorist networks, Rapp’s relentless pursuit of justice highlights themes of patriotism, revenge, and moral ambiguity. Flynn’s meticulous research and fast-paced narrative offer a realistic portrayal of covert operations, making it a standout in the espionage genre. The book’s significance lies in its exploration of the psychological toll of warfare and the complexities of modern counterterrorism efforts.
    PreviousNext
    American Assassin

    Chapter 22

    by Flynn, Vince

    In Chap­ter 22 of *Amer­i­can Assas­sin*, key intel­li­gence figures—Kennedy, Stans­field, Hur­ley, and Lewis—gather at a seclud­ed Vir­ginia lake house to dis­cuss a new recruit, Mitch Rapp. The meet­ing takes place in a sound­proof base­ment room equipped with sur­veil­lance tech­nol­o­gy, empha­siz­ing the secre­cy of their oper­a­tions. Stans­field, the Deputy Direc­tor of Oper­a­tions, sets the tone with his qui­et author­i­ty, ensur­ing the dis­cus­sion remains con­fi­den­tial. The ten­sion is pal­pa­ble as the group pre­pares to address Rapp’s unex­pect­ed prowess dur­ing train­ing, which has already result­ed in injuries to two sea­soned oper­a­tives.

    The focus shifts to Rapp’s capa­bil­i­ties, with Hur­ley express­ing frus­tra­tion over Rapp’s rapid mas­tery of com­bat skills, includ­ing Brazil­ian jujit­su. Lewis, the ther­a­pist-like fig­ure, attempts to medi­ate while high­light­ing con­cerns about Hurley’s aggres­sive train­ing meth­ods. Hur­ley defends his approach, argu­ing that decep­tion is inher­ent to their work, while Lewis coun­ters that trust is foun­da­tion­al. Kennedy, Rapp’s recruiter, clash­es with Hur­ley, who dis­miss­es Rapp’s lack of mil­i­tary expe­ri­ence and ques­tions his back­ground. The debate reveals deep­er fric­tion between Hurley’s tra­di­tion­al­ist views and Kennedy’s mod­ern, urban-focused approach to coun­tert­er­ror­ism.

    Hur­ley reveals he inves­ti­gat­ed Rapp’s past, uncov­er­ing dis­crep­an­cies in his sto­ry. Rapp alleged­ly claimed min­i­mal mar­tial arts expe­ri­ence but quick­ly dom­i­nat­ed his dojo, rais­ing sus­pi­cions about his true iden­ti­ty. Kennedy accus­es Hur­ley of under­min­ing her recruit­ment efforts, while Hur­ley insists Rapp’s rapid skill acqui­si­tion is implau­si­ble. Stans­field, grow­ing impa­tient, demands clar­i­ty, but Hur­ley can only voice vague doubts. Kennedy dis­miss­es Hurley’s con­cerns as bias, attribut­ing them to his resis­tance to her involve­ment in the pro­gram.

    The chap­ter ends with unre­solved ten­sion, as Hurley’s dis­trust of Rapp clash­es with Kennedy’s con­fi­dence in her recruit. Stansfield’s silence sug­gests he is weigh­ing both sides, while Lewis attempts to steer the con­ver­sa­tion toward oper­a­tional integri­ty. The debate under­scores the chal­lenges of bal­anc­ing trust and decep­tion in intel­li­gence work, as well as the gen­er­a­tional and method­olog­i­cal divides with­in the team. Rapp’s enig­mat­ic back­ground remains a point of con­tention, set­ting the stage for fur­ther con­flict and rev­e­la­tion.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What are the key points of conflict between Hurley and Kennedy regarding Mitch Rapp’s recruitment and training?

      Answer:
      The conflict centers on fundamental disagreements about recruitment philosophy and training methods. Hurley, representing the traditionalist perspective, believes recruits should come from Special Forces backgrounds and be tested through harsh, deceptive methods to prove their worth (as shown when he says “this is selection” and mocks Rapp’s civilian background). Kennedy, however, values urban-relevant skills and trust-building, arguing Hurley’s methods are counterproductive. Their clash escalates when Hurley investigates Rapp’s martial arts background without Kennedy’s approval, suggesting Rapp might be a plant due to his rapid skill acquisition. This highlights tensions between institutional distrust (Hurley) and progressive recruitment strategies (Kennedy).

      2. How does the chapter characterize Stansfield’s leadership style during the basement meeting?

      Answer:
      Stansfield is portrayed as a quiet but authoritative leader who commands respect through subtlety rather than overt dominance. His leadership is evident when his “suggestion” to move to the basement is understood as an order, and when he listens intently without interruption during Lewis’s narrative. He intervenes only when necessary, demanding specificity from Hurley (“Be more specific”) as tensions rise. The description of his bodyguards—who know “to be very selective about what they remembered”—further reinforces his preference for controlled, confidential environments. His leadership contrasts sharply with Hurley’s volatility and Kennedy’s confrontational style.

      3. Analyze the significance of the dojo revelation about Rapp’s training. How does this discovery impact the group’s dynamics?

      Answer:
      The revelation that Rapp advanced from novice to dominating his dojo in just three months introduces doubt about his background and loyalties, fueling Hurley’s suspicion. This discovery destabilizes the group by undermining Kennedy’s credibility (as Rapp’s recruiter) and validating Hurley’s distrust of non-traditional candidates. Lewis’s observation about Rapp’s Brazilian jujitsu style adds credence to Hurley’s concerns, shifting the discussion from training philosophy to a potential security threat. The tension escalates as Kennedy accuses Hurley of misogyny, revealing deeper interpersonal conflicts. This moment forces the group to confront whether Rapp’s exceptionalism is an asset or a risk.

      4. How does the physical setting of the basement meeting reflect the themes of secrecy and control in the chapter?

      Answer:
      The soundproof basement room, with its egg-crate foam walls and bolted door, physically embodies the clandestine nature of the characters’ work. The surveillance equipment and conference table suggest a space designed for both operational secrecy and strategic deliberation. Stansfield’s deliberate actions—closing the door and throwing the bolt—mirror the group’s need to compartmentalize information, a theme reinforced by the bodyguards’ selective awareness. The setting amplifies the tension between transparency (advocated by Lewis and Kennedy) and deception (Hurley’s methods), literally enclosing the debate in a space where control over information is paramount.

      5. Evaluate Hurley’s argument that deception is essential in training. How does Lewis counter this perspective?

      Answer:
      Hurley justifies deception as a tool to quickly identify capable operatives, arguing that lying is inherent to their work (“We deceive people”). He dismisses theoretical objections, emphasizing real-world efficiency (“I don’t have all day to dick around”). Lewis counters that trust is foundational for effective teams, distinguishing between deceiving enemies (acceptable) and deceiving allies (damaging). He warns that Hurley’s methods could erode the relational bedrock needed for long-term collaboration, a point underscored when Kennedy notes Rapp’s urban skills may outweigh traditional military training. Their debate reflects a broader tension between immediate tactical needs (Hurley) and sustainable organizational culture (Lewis).

    Quotes

    • 1. “Stansfield suggested in his typical quiet way that they all adjourn to the basement. It was not a suggestion. It was an order.”

      This quote introduces Stansfield’s authoritative leadership style and sets the tone for the clandestine meeting, emphasizing the gravity of the discussion about to take place in the secure basement room.

      2. “‘I’m not onboard with your methods of deception.’… ‘strong relationships are built on trust. We can work on the deception part later.’”

      Dr. Lewis’s statement captures the central conflict between building trust versus employing deception in training operatives, representing a philosophical divide in their approach to recruitment and development.

      3. “‘This is selection, and besides, this is what we do for a living. We deceive people. If these kids don’t understand that, they have no business signing up with us.’”

      Hurley’s blunt defense of his methods reveals the harsh realities of intelligence work and the pragmatic mindset required for operational success, contrasting sharply with Lewis’s more psychological approach.

      4. “‘The kid doesn’t pass the smell test… You can’t get that good that quick.’”

      This quote highlights the growing suspicion about Rapp’s unusual capabilities and background, creating tension about whether he might be a plant or have hidden motives - a key turning point in the chapter’s narrative.

      5. “‘He’s a misogynist.’… ‘He doesn’t like him because he’s my recruit.’”

      Kennedy’s accusation reveals underlying interpersonal conflicts and biases within the team, showing how personal dynamics complicate their professional judgments about Rapp’s potential.

    Quotes

    1. “Stansfield suggested in his typical quiet way that they all adjourn to the basement. It was not a suggestion. It was an order.”

    This quote introduces Stansfield’s authoritative leadership style and sets the tone for the clandestine meeting, emphasizing the gravity of the discussion about to take place in the secure basement room.

    2. “‘I’m not onboard with your methods of deception.’… ‘strong relationships are built on trust. We can work on the deception part later.’”

    Dr. Lewis’s statement captures the central conflict between building trust versus employing deception in training operatives, representing a philosophical divide in their approach to recruitment and development.

    3. “‘This is selection, and besides, this is what we do for a living. We deceive people. If these kids don’t understand that, they have no business signing up with us.’”

    Hurley’s blunt defense of his methods reveals the harsh realities of intelligence work and the pragmatic mindset required for operational success, contrasting sharply with Lewis’s more psychological approach.

    4. “‘The kid doesn’t pass the smell test… You can’t get that good that quick.’”

    This quote highlights the growing suspicion about Rapp’s unusual capabilities and background, creating tension about whether he might be a plant or have hidden motives - a key turning point in the chapter’s narrative.

    5. “‘He’s a misogynist.’… ‘He doesn’t like him because he’s my recruit.’”

    Kennedy’s accusation reveals underlying interpersonal conflicts and biases within the team, showing how personal dynamics complicate their professional judgments about Rapp’s potential.

    FAQs

    1. What are the key points of conflict between Hurley and Kennedy regarding Mitch Rapp’s recruitment and training?

    Answer:
    The conflict centers on fundamental disagreements about recruitment philosophy and training methods. Hurley, representing the traditionalist perspective, believes recruits should come from Special Forces backgrounds and be tested through harsh, deceptive methods to prove their worth (as shown when he says “this is selection” and mocks Rapp’s civilian background). Kennedy, however, values urban-relevant skills and trust-building, arguing Hurley’s methods are counterproductive. Their clash escalates when Hurley investigates Rapp’s martial arts background without Kennedy’s approval, suggesting Rapp might be a plant due to his rapid skill acquisition. This highlights tensions between institutional distrust (Hurley) and progressive recruitment strategies (Kennedy).

    2. How does the chapter characterize Stansfield’s leadership style during the basement meeting?

    Answer:
    Stansfield is portrayed as a quiet but authoritative leader who commands respect through subtlety rather than overt dominance. His leadership is evident when his “suggestion” to move to the basement is understood as an order, and when he listens intently without interruption during Lewis’s narrative. He intervenes only when necessary, demanding specificity from Hurley (“Be more specific”) as tensions rise. The description of his bodyguards—who know “to be very selective about what they remembered”—further reinforces his preference for controlled, confidential environments. His leadership contrasts sharply with Hurley’s volatility and Kennedy’s confrontational style.

    3. Analyze the significance of the dojo revelation about Rapp’s training. How does this discovery impact the group’s dynamics?

    Answer:
    The revelation that Rapp advanced from novice to dominating his dojo in just three months introduces doubt about his background and loyalties, fueling Hurley’s suspicion. This discovery destabilizes the group by undermining Kennedy’s credibility (as Rapp’s recruiter) and validating Hurley’s distrust of non-traditional candidates. Lewis’s observation about Rapp’s Brazilian jujitsu style adds credence to Hurley’s concerns, shifting the discussion from training philosophy to a potential security threat. The tension escalates as Kennedy accuses Hurley of misogyny, revealing deeper interpersonal conflicts. This moment forces the group to confront whether Rapp’s exceptionalism is an asset or a risk.

    4. How does the physical setting of the basement meeting reflect the themes of secrecy and control in the chapter?

    Answer:
    The soundproof basement room, with its egg-crate foam walls and bolted door, physically embodies the clandestine nature of the characters’ work. The surveillance equipment and conference table suggest a space designed for both operational secrecy and strategic deliberation. Stansfield’s deliberate actions—closing the door and throwing the bolt—mirror the group’s need to compartmentalize information, a theme reinforced by the bodyguards’ selective awareness. The setting amplifies the tension between transparency (advocated by Lewis and Kennedy) and deception (Hurley’s methods), literally enclosing the debate in a space where control over information is paramount.

    5. Evaluate Hurley’s argument that deception is essential in training. How does Lewis counter this perspective?

    Answer:
    Hurley justifies deception as a tool to quickly identify capable operatives, arguing that lying is inherent to their work (“We deceive people”). He dismisses theoretical objections, emphasizing real-world efficiency (“I don’t have all day to dick around”). Lewis counters that trust is foundational for effective teams, distinguishing between deceiving enemies (acceptable) and deceiving allies (damaging). He warns that Hurley’s methods could erode the relational bedrock needed for long-term collaboration, a point underscored when Kennedy notes Rapp’s urban skills may outweigh traditional military training. Their debate reflects a broader tension between immediate tactical needs (Hurley) and sustainable organizational culture (Lewis).

    Note