Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Against All Things Ending
    FantasyFiction

    Against All Things Ending

    by R., Donaldson, Stephen
    “Against All Things Ending” by Stephen R. Donaldson is the penultimate novel in the “Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant” series. The story follows Thomas Covenant, a leprosy-stricken man transported to the magical world of the Land, where he grapples with his role as a reluctant savior amid impending doom. Key themes include redemption, sacrifice, and the struggle against despair. As Covenant and his allies confront apocalyptic forces, the narrative explores the weight of responsibility and the fragility of hope. Donaldson’s intricate world-building and moral complexity make this a pivotal installment in the epic fantasy saga.
    PreviousNext
    Against All Things Ending

    Chapter 5: Part One — 5. Preparations

    by R., Donaldson, Stephen

    Lin­den Avery is over­whelmed by con­flict­ing emo­tions after res­ur­rect­ing Thomas Covenant at a great per­son­al cost. While grate­ful for his unwa­ver­ing sup­port, she strug­gles with feel­ings of inad­e­qua­cy, as his belief in her under­mines her self-per­cep­tion of guilt and blame. She finds her­self caught between hope and despair, ques­tion­ing whether friend­ship and love dimin­ish her sense of pur­pose. The chap­ter high­lights her inter­nal tur­moil as she grap­ples with the para­dox of being both empow­ered and weak­ened by the trust of her com­pan­ions, includ­ing Covenant, the Hum­bled, and Stave, who stands apart as a soli­tary fig­ure.

    The reac­tions of Linden’s com­pan­ions reflect the shift­ing dynam­ics among the group. The Hum­bled, Giants, Ramen, and Liand each respond dif­fer­ent­ly to Covenant’s influ­ence, with some express­ing awe, skep­ti­cism, or cau­tious opti­mism. The Giants pre­pare for an uncer­tain jour­ney, assign­ing roles to pro­tect their allies, while Liand’s pride in Covenant’s accom­plish­ments under­scores his unwa­ver­ing loy­al­ty. Mean­while, Covenant slips into frag­ment­ed mem­o­ries, hint­ing at deep­er fears, and the Har­row and Ardent grow impa­tient. These inter­ac­tions empha­size the ten­sion between uni­ty and indi­vid­ual agen­das with­in the group.

    Liand, ever com­pas­sion­ate, approach­es Lin­den to offer solace, urg­ing her to draw strength from the trust of her friends. He reminds her of their shared tri­als and sac­ri­fices, empha­siz­ing their vol­un­tary com­mit­ment to stand by her despite the dan­gers. Lin­den, how­ev­er, remains par­a­lyzed by guilt, con­fess­ing her fail­ure to save Covenant’s daugh­ter, Ele­na, and her sense of bro­ken­ness. Liand’s stern yet dig­ni­fied response shifts from com­fort to com­mand, insist­ing she must act despite her despair, as delay only wors­ens the per­il fac­ing her son, Jere­mi­ah.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates in Linden’s real­iza­tion that she must move for­ward, even in her frac­tured state. Liand’s unex­pect­ed author­i­ty jolts her out of her paral­y­sis, sig­nal­ing a turn­ing point in her resolve. The group’s prepa­ra­tions and Covenant’s cryp­tic mus­ings about Sand­gor­gons hint at loom­ing chal­lenges, while Linden’s inter­nal strug­gle mir­rors the broad­er themes of sac­ri­fice, trust, and the weight of lead­er­ship. The stage is set for the next phase of their jour­ney, with Lin­den poised to con­front her fears and embrace the uncer­tain path ahead.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What conflicting emotions does Linden experience after Covenant’s declarations, and how do they reflect her internal struggle?

      Answer:
      Linden is overwhelmed by a tumult of conflicting emotions—dismay, gratitude, hope, and despair—that leave her emotionally adrift. She feels grateful for Covenant’s unwavering support, which hints at his capacity to forgive her “vast crime,” yet this very affirmation weakens her. Blame had previously given her a sense of identity and purpose; without it, she feels insignificant. The chapter illustrates her paradoxical need for both condemnation and acceptance, highlighting her struggle to reconcile self-worth with vulnerability. Her emotional state reflects a broader theme of how relationships and trust can simultaneously empower and destabilize a person.

      2. How does Stave’s isolation contrast with Linden’s current emotional state, and what does this reveal about their characters?

      Answer:
      Stave’s strength stems from his isolation after being cast out by the Haruchai, which allows him to act independently and support Linden by choice. In contrast, Linden feels weakened by the acceptance and trust of her friends, as it strips away her reliance on blame as a defining force. This juxtaposition reveals Stave’s resilience in solitude versus Linden’s struggle to adapt to interdependence. Their differing responses to alienation and community underscore the chapter’s exploration of identity: Stave finds purpose in defiance, while Linden grapples with the loss of her former, solitary strength.

      3. Analyze the significance of Liand’s speech to Linden. How does it challenge her perspective, and what role does he play in her journey?

      Answer:
      Liand’s speech serves as both comfort and a call to action. He reminds Linden that her companions—despite lacking innate power—choose to stand with her willingly, having faced immense dangers for her sake. His words challenge her self-perception as “broken” by reframing her support system as a source of strength rather than a crutch. By urging her to “arise” and act, Liand shifts from compassion to authority, emphasizing agency over despair. His role transcends loyalty; he becomes a moral anchor, pushing Linden toward resilience even when she feels powerless.

      4. How do the reactions of Linden’s companions (e.g., Giants, Ramen, Humbled) reflect their cultural values and relationships with her?

      Answer:
      Each group’s response reveals distinct priorities. The Giants, though wary of the Humbled, focus on practical preparations—discussing contingencies and assigning protective roles, reflecting their warrior ethos and communal pragmatism. The Ramen (Pahni, Bhapa) and Liand display awe and vindication, emphasizing their reverence for Covenant and Linden. The Humbled’s impassive stance contrasts with Stave’s defiance, underscoring Haruchai rigidity versus individualism. These reactions collectively highlight how Linden’s leadership intersects with diverse cultural frameworks, from the Giants’ strategic camaraderie to Liand’s Stonedownor idealism.

      5. What thematic tension arises from Covenant’s fragmented memories and Linden’s paralysis? How might this impact their quest?

      Answer:
      Both characters embody fractured states—Covenant mentally (lost in memories of Sandgorgons) and Linden emotionally (paralyzed by guilt)—which mirror the Land’s instability. Their incapacities create a tension between urgency (Anele’s fretting, the Harrow’s frustration) and stagnation, threatening the quest’s progress. Covenant’s incoherence suggests hidden clues, while Linden’s inertia risks delaying Jeremiah’s rescue. This duality underscores the chapter’s central conflict: overcoming internal brokenness to confront external threats. Their ability to reconcile these fractures will determine whether they can unite their companions against the looming “Earth’s doom.”

    Quotes

    • 1. “According to the contradictory logic of her emotions, he diminished her by denying that her every deed was wrong. If everything that she had done deserved repudiation, at least she knew where she stood. Blame told her who she was. It gave her meaning. Without it, she was less than powerless: she was insignificant.”

      This quote captures Linden’s internal conflict—her paradoxical need for blame as a source of identity and purpose, even as Covenant’s forgiveness destabilizes her. It reflects the chapter’s exploration of how acceptance can feel like a loss of self.

      2. “Perhaps this was what it meant to have friends and the possibility of love: to become smaller, too inadequate and fallible for words—and thereby to find herself no longer alone. No longer either solely culpable or solely necessary.”

      Here, Linden begins to grasp the transformative power of vulnerability in relationships. The quote distills a key theme: the tension between isolation/control and connection/imperfection.

      3. “Roger and the croyel dreamed of becoming gods. Apparently Covenant believed that Jeremiah’s plight and the Land’s could not be distinguished from each other.”

      This reveals a critical plot insight—the convergence of personal and cosmic stakes—while hinting at the antagonists’ motivations. It marks a turning point where Linden must reconcile her son’s fate with the Land’s survival.

      4. “‘Then,’ he told her sternly, ‘there is no other path for you. You must walk it or perish. Arise now and allow the Harrow to fulfill the terms of your exchange. Every delay heightens your own peril as much as your son’s.’”

      Liand’s forceful admonition represents the chapter’s climax, shifting Linden from introspection to action. The quote underscores the urgency of their quest and the cost of hesitation.

      5. “She was not sure that she could bear it.”

      This stark, simple statement encapsulates Linden’s emotional nadir. It resonates as a refrain throughout the chapter, emphasizing the weight of her burdens—both given and relinquished.

    Quotes

    1. “According to the contradictory logic of her emotions, he diminished her by denying that her every deed was wrong. If everything that she had done deserved repudiation, at least she knew where she stood. Blame told her who she was. It gave her meaning. Without it, she was less than powerless: she was insignificant.”

    This quote captures Linden’s internal conflict—her paradoxical need for blame as a source of identity and purpose, even as Covenant’s forgiveness destabilizes her. It reflects the chapter’s exploration of how acceptance can feel like a loss of self.

    2. “Perhaps this was what it meant to have friends and the possibility of love: to become smaller, too inadequate and fallible for words—and thereby to find herself no longer alone. No longer either solely culpable or solely necessary.”

    Here, Linden begins to grasp the transformative power of vulnerability in relationships. The quote distills a key theme: the tension between isolation/control and connection/imperfection.

    3. “Roger and the croyel dreamed of becoming gods. Apparently Covenant believed that Jeremiah’s plight and the Land’s could not be distinguished from each other.”

    This reveals a critical plot insight—the convergence of personal and cosmic stakes—while hinting at the antagonists’ motivations. It marks a turning point where Linden must reconcile her son’s fate with the Land’s survival.

    4. “‘Then,’ he told her sternly, ‘there is no other path for you. You must walk it or perish. Arise now and allow the Harrow to fulfill the terms of your exchange. Every delay heightens your own peril as much as your son’s.’”

    Liand’s forceful admonition represents the chapter’s climax, shifting Linden from introspection to action. The quote underscores the urgency of their quest and the cost of hesitation.

    5. “She was not sure that she could bear it.”

    This stark, simple statement encapsulates Linden’s emotional nadir. It resonates as a refrain throughout the chapter, emphasizing the weight of her burdens—both given and relinquished.

    FAQs

    1. What conflicting emotions does Linden experience after Covenant’s declarations, and how do they reflect her internal struggle?

    Answer:
    Linden is overwhelmed by a tumult of conflicting emotions—dismay, gratitude, hope, and despair—that leave her emotionally adrift. She feels grateful for Covenant’s unwavering support, which hints at his capacity to forgive her “vast crime,” yet this very affirmation weakens her. Blame had previously given her a sense of identity and purpose; without it, she feels insignificant. The chapter illustrates her paradoxical need for both condemnation and acceptance, highlighting her struggle to reconcile self-worth with vulnerability. Her emotional state reflects a broader theme of how relationships and trust can simultaneously empower and destabilize a person.

    2. How does Stave’s isolation contrast with Linden’s current emotional state, and what does this reveal about their characters?

    Answer:
    Stave’s strength stems from his isolation after being cast out by the Haruchai, which allows him to act independently and support Linden by choice. In contrast, Linden feels weakened by the acceptance and trust of her friends, as it strips away her reliance on blame as a defining force. This juxtaposition reveals Stave’s resilience in solitude versus Linden’s struggle to adapt to interdependence. Their differing responses to alienation and community underscore the chapter’s exploration of identity: Stave finds purpose in defiance, while Linden grapples with the loss of her former, solitary strength.

    3. Analyze the significance of Liand’s speech to Linden. How does it challenge her perspective, and what role does he play in her journey?

    Answer:
    Liand’s speech serves as both comfort and a call to action. He reminds Linden that her companions—despite lacking innate power—choose to stand with her willingly, having faced immense dangers for her sake. His words challenge her self-perception as “broken” by reframing her support system as a source of strength rather than a crutch. By urging her to “arise” and act, Liand shifts from compassion to authority, emphasizing agency over despair. His role transcends loyalty; he becomes a moral anchor, pushing Linden toward resilience even when she feels powerless.

    4. How do the reactions of Linden’s companions (e.g., Giants, Ramen, Humbled) reflect their cultural values and relationships with her?

    Answer:
    Each group’s response reveals distinct priorities. The Giants, though wary of the Humbled, focus on practical preparations—discussing contingencies and assigning protective roles, reflecting their warrior ethos and communal pragmatism. The Ramen (Pahni, Bhapa) and Liand display awe and vindication, emphasizing their reverence for Covenant and Linden. The Humbled’s impassive stance contrasts with Stave’s defiance, underscoring Haruchai rigidity versus individualism. These reactions collectively highlight how Linden’s leadership intersects with diverse cultural frameworks, from the Giants’ strategic camaraderie to Liand’s Stonedownor idealism.

    5. What thematic tension arises from Covenant’s fragmented memories and Linden’s paralysis? How might this impact their quest?

    Answer:
    Both characters embody fractured states—Covenant mentally (lost in memories of Sandgorgons) and Linden emotionally (paralyzed by guilt)—which mirror the Land’s instability. Their incapacities create a tension between urgency (Anele’s fretting, the Harrow’s frustration) and stagnation, threatening the quest’s progress. Covenant’s incoherence suggests hidden clues, while Linden’s inertia risks delaying Jeremiah’s rescue. This duality underscores the chapter’s central conflict: overcoming internal brokenness to confront external threats. Their ability to reconcile these fractures will determine whether they can unite their companions against the looming “Earth’s doom.”

    Note