Header Background Image
    Cover of Good Material
    DystopianLiterary Fiction

    Good Material

    by Alderton, Dolly

    The chapter “Reasons Why It’s Good I’m Not With Jen” presents a candid and detailed reflection on the narrator’s complex feelings towards Jen, highlighting a series of personal quirks and social behaviors that created distance between them. The narrator recounts Jen’s lack of rhythm and dancing skills, her outdated views on glamour, and her peculiar habits such as refusing to arrive early at the airport and her prolonged, meticulous bedtime routine. These traits, combined with her tendency to talk excessively and relate every film plot back to herself, paint a picture of someone whose personality often clashed with the narrator’s expectations and lifestyle.

    Further complicating their relationship were Jen’s social circles and family dynamics, which the narrator found difficult to tolerate. Jen’s sister Miranda’s confrontational activism and disdain for certain demographics added tension, as did Jen’s work friends, described as dull and exclusive. Jen’s repeated postponements of adventurous plans and her long-term therapy sessions, which remained a private matter, contributed to a sense of unfulfilled potential and emotional distance. The narrator also reveals frustration with Jen’s overattachment to dogs and her family’s traditional activities, which contrasted sharply with his own preferences.

    The narrator expresses irritation at Jen’s critical nature, particularly her focus on his personal habits, and her inconsistent stance on having children, which seemed to lack genuine openness. Jen’s snobbery, especially her judgment of others’ fashion choices, and her slow pace in museums, where she showed exaggerated reverence for minor artifacts, further highlight the differences that made their relationship challenging. Despite these grievances, the narrator notes moments of vulnerability, such as Jen’s rare tears during a documentary, revealing a complex, multifaceted individual beneath the surface.

    Ultimately, the chapter conveys a mix of exasperation and resignation, culminating in the narrator’s blunt conclusion that Jen “ruined my life.” Through this introspective and sometimes biting account, the chapter explores how fundamental incompatibilities and contrasting personalities can erode a relationship. It offers a nuanced view of Jen, not merely as a source of frustration but as a person whose traits and choices were profoundly incompatible with the narrator’s desires and values, making their separation not only inevitable but, in the narrator’s view, beneficial.

    FAQs

    • 1. What are some specific personality traits and habits of Jen described in the chapter, and how do these contribute to the narrator’s perception of her?

      Answer:
      Jen is depicted as someone with several quirks and habits that annoy or embarrass the narrator. For example, she “can’t dance” and has “no rhythm,” which the narrator once found adorable but later found embarrassing. Jen talks too much, especially about her large family and political values, often smugly. She has a lengthy bedtime routine but leaves little time in the morning, is frequently late for the narrator but punctual for work, and cannot drive, which the narrator considers childish. Additionally, she is described as loquacious, often talking during movies, and overly connected to dogs, treating them like people. These traits contribute to the narrator’s overall sense that being with Jen is challenging and frustrating, reinforcing the chapter’s theme of reasons why it’s good they are no longer together.

      2. How does the narrator use humor and irony to convey their feelings about Jen and their relationship? Provide examples from the chapter.

      Answer:
      The narrator employs humor and irony extensively to express mixed feelings about Jen, often using exaggeration and sarcastic remarks. For instance, the narrator ironically notes Jen’s “lefty republican values” and her boast that she would reject an OBE, immediately undercut by the admission that she would “definitely never reject an OBE.” The statement about Jen’s “seven-step skincare routine” juxtaposed with only leaving 20 minutes to get ready in the morning humorously highlights her contradictions. The narrator also mocks Jen’s desire to take adventurous steps (like traveling or getting an uncut) but never following through, attributing it to excuses like hay fever or work restrictions. This use of humor softens the critique and reveals the narrator’s conflicted emotions—both irritation and a lingering sense of familiarity.

      3. Analyze how family and social background differences between Jen and the narrator are portrayed and their impact on the narrator’s attitude.

      Answer:
      Family and social backgrounds are subtly contrasted to highlight differences that contribute to tension. Jen is from a “big family” with three siblings, something she brags about as if it were a personal achievement, which the narrator finds irritating. Her sister Miranda is described as “unbearable,” politically vocal, and hostile toward the narrator, which adds to the narrator’s discomfort. Jen’s family enjoys “long circular walks and board games,” suggesting a conventional or close-knit domestic environment. Socially, Jen’s friends are “boring and cliquey,” and her ideas about glamour are described as outdated or pretentious. These contrasts emphasize the narrator’s perception of Jen as someone from a different, perhaps more insular world, adding layers to why their relationship was strained and why the narrator feels relieved to be apart.

      4. Considering the narrator’s detailed criticisms of Jen, what can be inferred about the narrator’s own values and personality?

      Answer:
      The narrator values authenticity, spontaneity, and a certain practicality, which conflict with Jen’s habits and attitudes. The narrator is embarrassed by Jen’s lack of rhythm and her affectations, suggesting a preference for naturalness over pretension. The annoyance at Jen’s long skincare routine and lateness indicate the narrator values punctuality and efficiency. The narrator also seems to prioritize serious communication about future plans, such as having children, which Jen avoids discussing seriously. The narrator’s irritation with Jen’s political posturing and therapy secrecy suggests a desire for transparency and straightforwardness. Overall, the narrator appears more grounded and pragmatic, frustrated by Jen’s contradictions and perceived insincerities.

      5. How does the chapter’s tone and structure contribute to the overall message about the relationship between the narrator and Jen?

      Answer:
      The chapter’s tone is candid, sardonic, and somewhat confessional, which creates an intimate and revealing portrait of the narrator’s feelings. The structure—a list of specific reasons why it’s good the narrator is not with Jen—gives the chapter a fragmented, almost stream-of-consciousness feel that mimics the way grudges and annoyances accumulate in memory. This format allows the narrator to cover a wide range of personal grievances, from small habits to deeper incompatibilities, making the narrative feel both detailed and personal. The mix of humor, bitterness, and occasional tenderness (such as noting the few times Jen cried) humanizes the account, conveying the complexity of ending a relationship and the relief mixed with regret. The overall message is that although there were shared experiences, the differences and frustrations justified the breakup.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Can’t dance. Has no rhythm at all. Used to find it adorable until I saw people laughing at her and hate to say I was embarrassed.”

      This opening quote sets the tone of candid personal observation, illustrating the speaker’s conflicted feelings toward Jen. It introduces the chapter’s theme of critical reflection on a past relationship, blending affection with discomfort.

      2. “Always used to boast about how she’d reject an OBE if it were offered to her because of her apparent lefty republican values but would never know why she’d be offered an OBE in this fantasy when I asked her.”

      This quote reveals the discrepancy between Jen’s self-image and reality, highlighting performative political posturing. It captures the chapter’s exploration of authenticity versus pretense in personal dynamics.

      3. “Would take an hour to go to bed, no matter what time she got in, because she’d do a seven-step skincare routine, browse shopping apps and listen to podcasts. And yet only left twenty minutes from her alarm going off to having to leave the flat in the morning.”

      Here, the author points out Jen’s contradictory habits, emphasizing a quirky but telling detail that reflects on her personality and lifestyle. It underscores the theme of frustration mingled with intimate knowledge of Jen’s idiosyncrasies.

      4. “Talked too much and too smugly about coming from a big family, as if it was her decision to have three siblings.”

      This remark criticizes Jen’s attitude and self-importance, illustrating interpersonal tensions. It contributes to the chapter’s portrayal of Jen’s character flaws as perceived by the narrator.

      5. “Ruined my life.”

      The final, stark statement serves as a powerful, emotional conclusion to the chapter. It encapsulates the narrator’s deep sense of personal impact and regret, underscoring the lasting effect of the relationship with Jen.

    Quotes

    1. “Can’t dance. Has no rhythm at all. Used to find it adorable until I saw people laughing at her and hate to say I was embarrassed.”

    This opening quote sets the tone of candid personal observation, illustrating the speaker’s conflicted feelings toward Jen. It introduces the chapter’s theme of critical reflection on a past relationship, blending affection with discomfort.

    2. “Always used to boast about how she’d reject an OBE if it were offered to her because of her apparent lefty republican values but would never know why she’d be offered an OBE in this fantasy when I asked her.”

    This quote reveals the discrepancy between Jen’s self-image and reality, highlighting performative political posturing. It captures the chapter’s exploration of authenticity versus pretense in personal dynamics.

    3. “Would take an hour to go to bed, no matter what time she got in, because she’d do a seven-step skincare routine, browse shopping apps and listen to podcasts. And yet only left twenty minutes from her alarm going off to having to leave the flat in the morning.”

    Here, the author points out Jen’s contradictory habits, emphasizing a quirky but telling detail that reflects on her personality and lifestyle. It underscores the theme of frustration mingled with intimate knowledge of Jen’s idiosyncrasies.

    4. “Talked too much and too smugly about coming from a big family, as if it was her decision to have three siblings.”

    This remark criticizes Jen’s attitude and self-importance, illustrating interpersonal tensions. It contributes to the chapter’s portrayal of Jen’s character flaws as perceived by the narrator.

    5. “Ruined my life.”

    The final, stark statement serves as a powerful, emotional conclusion to the chapter. It encapsulates the narrator’s deep sense of personal impact and regret, underscoring the lasting effect of the relationship with Jen.

    — Unknown

    FAQs

    1. What are some specific personality traits and habits of Jen described in the chapter, and how do these contribute to the narrator’s perception of her?

    Answer:
    Jen is depicted as someone with several quirks and habits that annoy or embarrass the narrator. For example, she “can’t dance” and has “no rhythm,” which the narrator once found adorable but later found embarrassing. Jen talks too much, especially about her large family and political values, often smugly. She has a lengthy bedtime routine but leaves little time in the morning, is frequently late for the narrator but punctual for work, and cannot drive, which the narrator considers childish. Additionally, she is described as loquacious, often talking during movies, and overly connected to dogs, treating them like people. These traits contribute to the narrator’s overall sense that being with Jen is challenging and frustrating, reinforcing the chapter’s theme of reasons why it’s good they are no longer together.

    2. How does the narrator use humor and irony to convey their feelings about Jen and their relationship? Provide examples from the chapter.

    Answer:
    The narrator employs humor and irony extensively to express mixed feelings about Jen, often using exaggeration and sarcastic remarks. For instance, the narrator ironically notes Jen’s “lefty republican values” and her boast that she would reject an OBE, immediately undercut by the admission that she would “definitely never reject an OBE.” The statement about Jen’s “seven-step skincare routine” juxtaposed with only leaving 20 minutes to get ready in the morning humorously highlights her contradictions. The narrator also mocks Jen’s desire to take adventurous steps (like traveling or getting an uncut) but never following through, attributing it to excuses like hay fever or work restrictions. This use of humor softens the critique and reveals the narrator’s conflicted emotions—both irritation and a lingering sense of familiarity.

    3. Analyze how family and social background differences between Jen and the narrator are portrayed and their impact on the narrator’s attitude.

    Answer:
    Family and social backgrounds are subtly contrasted to highlight differences that contribute to tension. Jen is from a “big family” with three siblings, something she brags about as if it were a personal achievement, which the narrator finds irritating. Her sister Miranda is described as “unbearable,” politically vocal, and hostile toward the narrator, which adds to the narrator’s discomfort. Jen’s family enjoys “long circular walks and board games,” suggesting a conventional or close-knit domestic environment. Socially, Jen’s friends are “boring and cliquey,” and her ideas about glamour are described as outdated or pretentious. These contrasts emphasize the narrator’s perception of Jen as someone from a different, perhaps more insular world, adding layers to why their relationship was strained and why the narrator feels relieved to be apart.

    4. Considering the narrator’s detailed criticisms of Jen, what can be inferred about the narrator’s own values and personality?

    Answer:
    The narrator values authenticity, spontaneity, and a certain practicality, which conflict with Jen’s habits and attitudes. The narrator is embarrassed by Jen’s lack of rhythm and her affectations, suggesting a preference for naturalness over pretension. The annoyance at Jen’s long skincare routine and lateness indicate the narrator values punctuality and efficiency. The narrator also seems to prioritize serious communication about future plans, such as having children, which Jen avoids discussing seriously. The narrator’s irritation with Jen’s political posturing and therapy secrecy suggests a desire for transparency and straightforwardness. Overall, the narrator appears more grounded and pragmatic, frustrated by Jen’s contradictions and perceived insincerities.

    5. How does the chapter’s tone and structure contribute to the overall message about the relationship between the narrator and Jen?

    Answer:
    The chapter’s tone is candid, sardonic, and somewhat confessional, which creates an intimate and revealing portrait of the narrator’s feelings. The structure—a list of specific reasons why it’s good the narrator is not with Jen—gives the chapter a fragmented, almost stream-of-consciousness feel that mimics the way grudges and annoyances accumulate in memory. This format allows the narrator to cover a wide range of personal grievances, from small habits to deeper incompatibilities, making the narrative feel both detailed and personal. The mix of humor, bitterness, and occasional tenderness (such as noting the few times Jen cried) humanizes the account, conveying the complexity of ending a relationship and the relief mixed with regret. The overall message is that although there were shared experiences, the differences and frustrations justified the breakup.

    0 Comments

    Heads up! Your comment will be invisible to other guests and subscribers (except for replies), including you after a grace period.
    Note