Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Never Let Me Go
    DystopianFictionLiterary FictionPhilosophicalScience Fiction

    Never Let Me Go

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo
    Kazuo Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go” is a poignant dystopian novel exploring themes of identity, mortality, and the ethics of human cloning. The story follows Kathy H., a caregiver reflecting on her childhood at Hailsham, an isolated English boarding school where students are raised to become organ donors. As Kathy reconnects with her friends Ruth and Tommy, they confront their predetermined fate and the fleeting nature of their existence. Ishiguro’s restrained prose and subtle world-building underscore the novel’s meditation on love, loss, and what it means to be human. A haunting and thought-provoking work, it challenges readers to consider the moral implications of scientific advancement.
    PreviousNext
    Never Let Me Go

    Chapter 18: Eighteen

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo

    The chap­ter explores the emo­tion­al and psy­cho­log­i­cal chal­lenges faced by car­ers, focus­ing on the nar­ra­tor Kathy’s per­spec­tive. While she adapts well to the role, oth­ers like her for­mer friend Lau­ra strug­gle with the iso­la­tion and emo­tion­al toll. The job involves long hours of soli­tary trav­el, fleet­ing inter­ac­tions, and the con­stant prox­im­i­ty to suf­fer­ing, par­tic­u­lar­ly when donors die unex­pect­ed­ly. Kathy reflects on how some car­ers, like Lau­ra, become demor­al­ized and unable to cope, while she her­self has learned to man­age the hard­ships, main­tain­ing a sense of pur­pose despite the dif­fi­cul­ties.

    Kathy describes the pro­found soli­tude of being a car­er, con­trast­ing it with the com­mu­nal life she once knew. She acknowl­edges the exhaus­tion and the way the job changes a person’s demeanor, yet she has grown to appre­ci­ate the qui­et moments of intro­spec­tion. Her rou­tine, includ­ing small plea­sures like brows­ing shops or admir­ing her col­lec­tion of lamps, helps her cope. How­ev­er, unex­pect­ed encoun­ters, such as run­ning into Lau­ra, dis­rupt this soli­tude and force her to con­front the emo­tion­al weight of her past and the real­i­ties of her friends’ strug­gles.

    The reunion with Lau­ra reveals the toll their work has tak­en on her. Lau­ra appears worn down, her spir­it­ed per­son­al­i­ty dimin­ished, and their con­ver­sa­tion revolves around her exhaus­tion and frus­tra­tions with donors and med­ical staff. They cau­tious­ly avoid dis­cussing their shared past until the top­ic of Ruth aris­es, hint­ing at unre­solved ten­sions. Laura’s sug­ges­tion that Kathy become Ruth’s car­er sparks a brief moment of con­nec­tion, but the con­ver­sa­tion quick­ly returns to Laura’s strug­gles, under­scor­ing the emo­tion­al dis­tance between them.

    The chap­ter ends with an unspo­ken ten­sion between Kathy and Lau­ra, hint­ing at deep­er, unad­dressed issues from their past. Their inter­ac­tion is marked by a mix of nos­tal­gia and avoid­ance, as nei­ther ful­ly engages with their shared his­to­ry. Kathy’s reluc­tance to recon­nect with Ruth, despite Laura’s encour­age­ment, sug­gests lin­ger­ing unre­solved con­flicts. The encounter leaves both characters—and the reader—aware of the emo­tion­al gaps they car­ry, even as they nav­i­gate the demands of their roles as car­ers.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Kathy describe the challenges of being a carer, and how do these challenges affect different individuals?

      Answer:
      Kathy outlines several significant challenges of being a carer, including emotional strain from witnessing donors’ suffering and unexpected deaths, as well as the solitude of the job. She notes that while some adapt quickly, others, like Laura, struggle profoundly. The isolation is particularly taxing—carers spend long hours alone, traveling between centers, with little social interaction. This lifestyle takes a toll on their physical and mental well-being, visible in their posture and demeanor. Kathy contrasts her own adaptability with carers who become demoralized or “shrink” in hospitals, unable to advocate for their donors effectively. These challenges highlight the emotional and psychological burdens of the role, which vary depending on individual resilience.

      2. Analyze Kathy’s reaction to encountering Laura after seven years. What does this reveal about her character and her coping mechanisms?

      Answer:
      Kathy’s initial hesitation to approach Laura reveals her preference for solitude and her discomfort with abrupt interruptions to her routine. She admits to being immersed in her own world, and the sudden encounter disrupts her emotional equilibrium. Her reluctance also stems from recognizing Laura’s decline—a reflection of the carer’s struggles she has observed in others. However, Kathy ultimately chooses to engage, demonstrating her underlying compassion and loyalty to past relationships. This duality—her desire for isolation versus her sense of duty—illustrates her complex coping mechanisms: she balances self-preservation with empathy, maintaining emotional distance while still connecting when necessary.

      3. What does the conversation between Kathy and Laura reveal about their past relationships with Ruth, and how does this reflect the broader themes of memory and friendship in the novel?

      Answer:
      Their discussion about Ruth underscores the fractured nature of their past friendships and the lingering tensions from their time at the Cottages. Laura admits she and Ruth were not on good terms, echoing Kathy’s own strained relationship with Ruth. Their avoidance of deeper reminiscing suggests a shared reluctance to confront painful memories. Yet, their brief acknowledgment of Ruth’s rumored suffering evokes sympathy, hinting at unresolved care beneath the surface. This dynamic reflects broader themes of memory and loss—how relationships fade, change, or leave marks even as characters move forward. The fleeting nature of their connections emphasizes the isolation and impermanence in their lives as carers and donors.

      4. How does Kathy’s attitude toward her role as a carer differ from Laura’s, and what might this contrast symbolize in the context of their world?

      Answer:
      Kathy approaches caregiving with resilience and pragmatism, finding ways to cope with solitude and advocate for donors. She takes pride in her ability to “get [her] voice heard,” contrasting with Laura’s exhaustion and defeat. Laura embodies the toll of the role—burned out, emotionally drained, and lacking agency. This dichotomy symbolizes the spectrum of responses to their oppressive reality: Kathy represents adaptation and quiet endurance, while Laura reflects the system’s crushing weight. Their differences highlight the limited choices available to clones—whether to resist, succumb, or find small ways to persist—underscoring the dehumanizing nature of their existence.

      5. Critical Thinking: Why might Kathy hesitate to become Ruth’s carer despite their past closeness, and what does this suggest about the ethics of their society?

      Answer:
      Kathy’s reluctance stems from both personal and systemic reasons. Her fractured friendship with Ruth and Ruth’s rumored difficult temperament make the prospect emotionally fraught. More broadly, her hesitation reflects the ethical contradictions of their world: while carers are meant to provide comfort, the system forces clones into roles where they must manage each other’s suffering. Kathy’s ambivalence suggests an unconscious recognition of this cruelty—avoiding Ruth may be a way to shield herself from guilt or pain. It also underscores the society’s failure to provide genuine care, leaving clones to navigate these dilemmas alone, further dehumanizing them.

    Quotes

    • 1. “For the most part being a carer’s suited me fine. You could even say it’s brought the best out of me. But some people just aren’t cut out for it, and for them the whole thing becomes a real struggle.”

      This opening quote establishes the narrator’s reflective tone and introduces the central theme of coping (or failing to cope) with the emotional and physical demands of being a carer. It sets up the dichotomy between those who adapt and those who deteriorate in this role.

      2. “Soon enough, the long hours, the travelling, the broken sleep have all crept into your being and become part of you, so everyone can see it, in your posture, your gaze, the way you move and talk.”

      A powerful description of how the carer’s lifestyle transforms a person physically and psychologically. This quote vividly captures the theme of institutionalization and the erosion of identity through systemic pressures.

      3. “I try not to make a nuisance of myself, but I’ve figured out how to get my voice heard when I have to. And when things go badly, of course I’m upset, but at least I can feel I’ve done all I could and keep things in perspective.”

      This reveals the narrator’s coping strategy and professional philosophy, contrasting with less effective carers. It shows her hard-won resilience and represents a key character insight about maintaining agency within a constrained system.

      4. “But also, I suppose, when I saw Laura slumped in her car like that, I saw immediately she’d become one of these carers I’ve just been describing, and a part of me just didn’t want to find out much more about it.”

      This pivotal moment when the narrator encounters Laura demonstrates the fear of confronting failed adaptation in others. The quote encapsulates the chapter’s exploration of how people cope (or fail to cope) with their institutional roles.

      5. “If you can choose, why don’t you become Ruth’s carer?… But you and Ruth, you were so close.”

      This exchange about Ruth introduces the theme of unresolved relationships from the past and the complex ethics of caregiving. It raises questions about obligation versus self-preservation that reverberate through the narrative.

    Quotes

    1. “For the most part being a carer’s suited me fine. You could even say it’s brought the best out of me. But some people just aren’t cut out for it, and for them the whole thing becomes a real struggle.”

    This opening quote establishes the narrator’s reflective tone and introduces the central theme of coping (or failing to cope) with the emotional and physical demands of being a carer. It sets up the dichotomy between those who adapt and those who deteriorate in this role.

    2. “Soon enough, the long hours, the travelling, the broken sleep have all crept into your being and become part of you, so everyone can see it, in your posture, your gaze, the way you move and talk.”

    A powerful description of how the carer’s lifestyle transforms a person physically and psychologically. This quote vividly captures the theme of institutionalization and the erosion of identity through systemic pressures.

    3. “I try not to make a nuisance of myself, but I’ve figured out how to get my voice heard when I have to. And when things go badly, of course I’m upset, but at least I can feel I’ve done all I could and keep things in perspective.”

    This reveals the narrator’s coping strategy and professional philosophy, contrasting with less effective carers. It shows her hard-won resilience and represents a key character insight about maintaining agency within a constrained system.

    4. “But also, I suppose, when I saw Laura slumped in her car like that, I saw immediately she’d become one of these carers I’ve just been describing, and a part of me just didn’t want to find out much more about it.”

    This pivotal moment when the narrator encounters Laura demonstrates the fear of confronting failed adaptation in others. The quote encapsulates the chapter’s exploration of how people cope (or fail to cope) with their institutional roles.

    5. “If you can choose, why don’t you become Ruth’s carer?… But you and Ruth, you were so close.”

    This exchange about Ruth introduces the theme of unresolved relationships from the past and the complex ethics of caregiving. It raises questions about obligation versus self-preservation that reverberate through the narrative.

    FAQs

    1. How does Kathy describe the challenges of being a carer, and how do these challenges affect different individuals?

    Answer:
    Kathy outlines several significant challenges of being a carer, including emotional strain from witnessing donors’ suffering and unexpected deaths, as well as the solitude of the job. She notes that while some adapt quickly, others, like Laura, struggle profoundly. The isolation is particularly taxing—carers spend long hours alone, traveling between centers, with little social interaction. This lifestyle takes a toll on their physical and mental well-being, visible in their posture and demeanor. Kathy contrasts her own adaptability with carers who become demoralized or “shrink” in hospitals, unable to advocate for their donors effectively. These challenges highlight the emotional and psychological burdens of the role, which vary depending on individual resilience.

    2. Analyze Kathy’s reaction to encountering Laura after seven years. What does this reveal about her character and her coping mechanisms?

    Answer:
    Kathy’s initial hesitation to approach Laura reveals her preference for solitude and her discomfort with abrupt interruptions to her routine. She admits to being immersed in her own world, and the sudden encounter disrupts her emotional equilibrium. Her reluctance also stems from recognizing Laura’s decline—a reflection of the carer’s struggles she has observed in others. However, Kathy ultimately chooses to engage, demonstrating her underlying compassion and loyalty to past relationships. This duality—her desire for isolation versus her sense of duty—illustrates her complex coping mechanisms: she balances self-preservation with empathy, maintaining emotional distance while still connecting when necessary.

    3. What does the conversation between Kathy and Laura reveal about their past relationships with Ruth, and how does this reflect the broader themes of memory and friendship in the novel?

    Answer:
    Their discussion about Ruth underscores the fractured nature of their past friendships and the lingering tensions from their time at the Cottages. Laura admits she and Ruth were not on good terms, echoing Kathy’s own strained relationship with Ruth. Their avoidance of deeper reminiscing suggests a shared reluctance to confront painful memories. Yet, their brief acknowledgment of Ruth’s rumored suffering evokes sympathy, hinting at unresolved care beneath the surface. This dynamic reflects broader themes of memory and loss—how relationships fade, change, or leave marks even as characters move forward. The fleeting nature of their connections emphasizes the isolation and impermanence in their lives as carers and donors.

    4. How does Kathy’s attitude toward her role as a carer differ from Laura’s, and what might this contrast symbolize in the context of their world?

    Answer:
    Kathy approaches caregiving with resilience and pragmatism, finding ways to cope with solitude and advocate for donors. She takes pride in her ability to “get [her] voice heard,” contrasting with Laura’s exhaustion and defeat. Laura embodies the toll of the role—burned out, emotionally drained, and lacking agency. This dichotomy symbolizes the spectrum of responses to their oppressive reality: Kathy represents adaptation and quiet endurance, while Laura reflects the system’s crushing weight. Their differences highlight the limited choices available to clones—whether to resist, succumb, or find small ways to persist—underscoring the dehumanizing nature of their existence.

    5. Critical Thinking: Why might Kathy hesitate to become Ruth’s carer despite their past closeness, and what does this suggest about the ethics of their society?

    Answer:
    Kathy’s reluctance stems from both personal and systemic reasons. Her fractured friendship with Ruth and Ruth’s rumored difficult temperament make the prospect emotionally fraught. More broadly, her hesitation reflects the ethical contradictions of their world: while carers are meant to provide comfort, the system forces clones into roles where they must manage each other’s suffering. Kathy’s ambivalence suggests an unconscious recognition of this cruelty—avoiding Ruth may be a way to shield herself from guilt or pain. It also underscores the society’s failure to provide genuine care, leaving clones to navigate these dilemmas alone, further dehumanizing them.

    Note