Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Never Let Me Go
    DystopianFictionLiterary FictionPhilosophicalScience Fiction

    Never Let Me Go

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo
    Kazuo Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go” is a poignant dystopian novel exploring themes of identity, mortality, and the ethics of human cloning. The story follows Kathy H., a caregiver reflecting on her childhood at Hailsham, an isolated English boarding school where students are raised to become organ donors. As Kathy reconnects with her friends Ruth and Tommy, they confront their predetermined fate and the fleeting nature of their existence. Ishiguro’s restrained prose and subtle world-building underscore the novel’s meditation on love, loss, and what it means to be human. A haunting and thought-provoking work, it challenges readers to consider the moral implications of scientific advancement.
    PreviousNext
    Never Let Me Go

    Chapter 13: Thirteen

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo

    The chap­ter begins with a dis­rupt­ed plan for a trip to Nor­folk, as Rodney’s arrange­ment to bor­row a car falls through at the last minute. Ruth, who had pre­vi­ous­ly act­ed indif­fer­ent about the trip, reacts strong­ly to the news, reveal­ing her hid­den invest­ment in the jour­ney. Despite her ear­li­er claims that she was only humor­ing Chrissie, her vis­i­ble dis­tress sug­gests she cares deeply about find­ing her “possible”—a per­son from her past. The nar­ra­tor, Kathy, attempts to cov­er for Ruth’s reac­tion, hint­ing at the under­ly­ing ten­sions and unspo­ken emo­tions among the group.

    Once the car issue is resolved, the group sets off ear­ly the next morn­ing. Ruth’s behav­ior dur­ing the ride becomes a source of ten­sion as she monop­o­lizes con­ver­sa­tion with the vet­er­ans, Chrissie and Rod­ney, iso­lat­ing Kathy and Tom­my. When Kathy sug­gests rear­rang­ing seats to ease the awk­ward dynam­ic, Ruth reacts defen­sive­ly, accus­ing her of caus­ing trou­ble. This con­fronta­tion high­lights Ruth’s pre­oc­cu­pa­tion with pro­ject­ing a cer­tain image to the vet­er­ans, reveal­ing her inse­cu­ri­ties and the group’s frag­ile dynam­ics. The ten­sion lingers, but Kathy reluc­tant­ly acqui­esces to avoid fur­ther con­flict.

    Upon arriv­ing at the sea­side town, the mood light­ens as the group enjoys the free­dom and excite­ment of the trip. The scenic beau­ty and cheer­ful atmos­phere tem­porar­i­ly over­shad­ow their orig­i­nal pur­pose. A shared moment of laugh­ter over a quirky café sign briefly restores the bond between Kathy and Ruth, offer­ing a fleet­ing respite from the ear­li­er strain. How­ev­er, this har­mo­ny is short-lived, as the under­ly­ing ten­sions soon resur­face.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with the group avoid­ing the main rea­son for their trip—the search for Ruth’s “pos­si­ble.” Instead, Chrissie and Rod­ney dom­i­nate the con­ver­sa­tion with nos­tal­gic sto­ries about their friend Mar­tin, leav­ing Kathy and Tom­my feel­ing exclud­ed. Their laugh­ter feels per­for­ma­tive, mask­ing the unspo­ken dis­com­fort and high­light­ing the group’s dis­joint­ed pri­or­i­ties. The chap­ter under­scores the com­plex­i­ties of their rela­tion­ships and the unre­solved emo­tions sim­mer­ing beneath the sur­face.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Ruth’s behavior regarding the trip reveal her true feelings about finding her “possible,” despite her earlier dismissive attitude?

      Answer:
      Ruth initially presents the trip as a joke, claiming she is only going to please Chrissie and to humor the idea of finding their “lost things” in Norfolk. However, when the car arrangement falls through, her extreme reaction—freezing, leaving abruptly, and showing visible distress—betrays her deep investment in the trip. This contrast highlights her internal conflict: she pretends indifference to protect herself from disappointment but is emotionally invested in the possibility of discovering her “possible.” Her later attempts to control interactions in the car further underscore her anxiety about how the group presents itself to the veterans, revealing her underlying vulnerability.

      2. Analyze the significance of the seating arrangement in the car and how it reflects the group’s dynamics.

      Answer:
      The seating arrangement (Chrissie and Rodney in front, Ruth, Tommy, and Kathy in back) initially seems natural but becomes a tool for Ruth to control communication. By leaning forward to talk exclusively with the veterans, Ruth physically and emotionally isolates Kathy and Tommy, preventing them from connecting. This mirrors Ruth’s desire to curate the group’s image and maintain a facade of unity in front of Chrissie and Rodney. Kathy’s suggestion to switch seats threatens this control, provoking Ruth’s angry reaction. The tension here underscores Ruth’s insecurity and the group’s fragile cohesion, as well as the power dynamics between the clones and the veterans.

      3. How does the setting of the seaside café serve as a brief moment of reconciliation between Kathy and Ruth, and why is it short-lived?

      Answer:
      The café, with its whimsical “look” sign and shared laughter, creates a fleeting sense of camaraderie between Kathy and Ruth. The novelty of the environment and the absurdity of the sign momentarily dissolve their earlier tension, reminding them of their shared history and inside jokes. However, this connection is fragile because it avoids addressing the underlying conflict—Ruth’s manipulation and Kathy’s resentment. When the conversation shifts to the veterans’ anecdotes about Martin, the focus returns to the outsiders (Chrissie and Rodney), reigniting Ruth’s performative behavior and Kathy’s sense of exclusion, cutting short their momentary bond.

      4. What does the veterans’ discussion about Martin reveal about the social norms at the Cottages, and how does this connect to the broader themes of the novel?

      Answer:
      The veterans’ animated stories about Martin—a former Cottage resident—highlight the unspoken taboo around discussing those who have left. Their excitement suggests they’ve repressed these memories until the trip, where they feel free to reminisce. This reflects the clones’ constrained lives, where even conversations are policed by invisible rules. The episode underscores the theme of institutional control: the clones are conditioned to avoid dwelling on their futures or those who’ve moved on, reinforcing their passive acceptance of their roles as donors. It also foreshadows the inevitability of the characters’ own departures and the silence that will surround them.

      5. Why might Kathy’s narration focus so intently on Ruth’s contradictions, and what does this reveal about their relationship?

      Answer:
      Kathy’s detailed observations of Ruth’s behavior—her false nonchalance, her outbursts, her performative gestures—highlight her role as both a participant and an analyst in their friendship. By exposing Ruth’s contradictions, Kathy subtly critiques Ruth’s attempts to control narratives and emotions, suggesting a mix of frustration and protectiveness. This dynamic reflects the complexity of their bond: Kathy understands Ruth’s vulnerabilities (hence her quick cover-up to Fiona) but also resents her manipulations. The narration underscores Kathy’s growing awareness of the performative aspects of their lives, as well as her own emotional restraint compared to Ruth’s volatility.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Until then, she’d been making out the whole thing was a bit of a joke, that if anything she was going along with it to please Chrissie. And she’d talked a lot about how we weren’t exploring our freedom nearly enough since leaving Hailsham; how anyway she’d always wanted to go to Norfolk to ‘find all our lost things.’”

      This quote reveals Ruth’s initial pretense of indifference about finding her “possible” (a doppelgänger or connection from their past), masking her deeper emotional investment. It highlights the tension between her outward nonchalance and inner vulnerability, a recurring theme in the chapter.

      2. “It was the way she did this, rather than her words, that suddenly made me see things her way; I could see that Ruth was making a big effort to present not just herself, but all of us, in the right way to Chrissie and Rodney; and here I was, threatening to undermine her and start an embarrassing scene.”

      This moment captures a key turning point where the narrator (Kathy) understands Ruth’s performative behavior—her desperate need to control how their group is perceived by the veterans. It underscores the social pressures and unspoken hierarchies at play in their relationships.

      3. “We took the table right at the back—which meant the one stuck out closest to the cliff edge—and when we sat down it felt like we were virtually suspended over the sea.”

      This vivid description symbolizes the precarious emotional state of the characters during their outing. The physical vertigo mirrors their psychological instability as they hover between childhood innocence and the looming realities of their futures.

      4. “That was a cosy little moment, when it felt like we’d left behind the bad feeling that had grown between us in the car. As it turned out, though, it was just about the last moment like that between me and Ruth for the rest of that outing.”

      This bittersweet observation foreshadows the growing rift between Kathy and Ruth. The fleeting harmony—centered on shared wonder at a mundane detail (“look” sign)—emphasizes how rare genuine connection becomes as their relationships grow more strained.

    Quotes

    1. “Until then, she’d been making out the whole thing was a bit of a joke, that if anything she was going along with it to please Chrissie. And she’d talked a lot about how we weren’t exploring our freedom nearly enough since leaving Hailsham; how anyway she’d always wanted to go to Norfolk to ‘find all our lost things.’”

    This quote reveals Ruth’s initial pretense of indifference about finding her “possible” (a doppelgänger or connection from their past), masking her deeper emotional investment. It highlights the tension between her outward nonchalance and inner vulnerability, a recurring theme in the chapter.

    2. “It was the way she did this, rather than her words, that suddenly made me see things her way; I could see that Ruth was making a big effort to present not just herself, but all of us, in the right way to Chrissie and Rodney; and here I was, threatening to undermine her and start an embarrassing scene.”

    This moment captures a key turning point where the narrator (Kathy) understands Ruth’s performative behavior—her desperate need to control how their group is perceived by the veterans. It underscores the social pressures and unspoken hierarchies at play in their relationships.

    3. “We took the table right at the back—which meant the one stuck out closest to the cliff edge—and when we sat down it felt like we were virtually suspended over the sea.”

    This vivid description symbolizes the precarious emotional state of the characters during their outing. The physical vertigo mirrors their psychological instability as they hover between childhood innocence and the looming realities of their futures.

    4. “That was a cosy little moment, when it felt like we’d left behind the bad feeling that had grown between us in the car. As it turned out, though, it was just about the last moment like that between me and Ruth for the rest of that outing.”

    This bittersweet observation foreshadows the growing rift between Kathy and Ruth. The fleeting harmony—centered on shared wonder at a mundane detail (“look” sign)—emphasizes how rare genuine connection becomes as their relationships grow more strained.

    FAQs

    1. How does Ruth’s behavior regarding the trip reveal her true feelings about finding her “possible,” despite her earlier dismissive attitude?

    Answer:
    Ruth initially presents the trip as a joke, claiming she is only going to please Chrissie and to humor the idea of finding their “lost things” in Norfolk. However, when the car arrangement falls through, her extreme reaction—freezing, leaving abruptly, and showing visible distress—betrays her deep investment in the trip. This contrast highlights her internal conflict: she pretends indifference to protect herself from disappointment but is emotionally invested in the possibility of discovering her “possible.” Her later attempts to control interactions in the car further underscore her anxiety about how the group presents itself to the veterans, revealing her underlying vulnerability.

    2. Analyze the significance of the seating arrangement in the car and how it reflects the group’s dynamics.

    Answer:
    The seating arrangement (Chrissie and Rodney in front, Ruth, Tommy, and Kathy in back) initially seems natural but becomes a tool for Ruth to control communication. By leaning forward to talk exclusively with the veterans, Ruth physically and emotionally isolates Kathy and Tommy, preventing them from connecting. This mirrors Ruth’s desire to curate the group’s image and maintain a facade of unity in front of Chrissie and Rodney. Kathy’s suggestion to switch seats threatens this control, provoking Ruth’s angry reaction. The tension here underscores Ruth’s insecurity and the group’s fragile cohesion, as well as the power dynamics between the clones and the veterans.

    3. How does the setting of the seaside café serve as a brief moment of reconciliation between Kathy and Ruth, and why is it short-lived?

    Answer:
    The café, with its whimsical “look” sign and shared laughter, creates a fleeting sense of camaraderie between Kathy and Ruth. The novelty of the environment and the absurdity of the sign momentarily dissolve their earlier tension, reminding them of their shared history and inside jokes. However, this connection is fragile because it avoids addressing the underlying conflict—Ruth’s manipulation and Kathy’s resentment. When the conversation shifts to the veterans’ anecdotes about Martin, the focus returns to the outsiders (Chrissie and Rodney), reigniting Ruth’s performative behavior and Kathy’s sense of exclusion, cutting short their momentary bond.

    4. What does the veterans’ discussion about Martin reveal about the social norms at the Cottages, and how does this connect to the broader themes of the novel?

    Answer:
    The veterans’ animated stories about Martin—a former Cottage resident—highlight the unspoken taboo around discussing those who have left. Their excitement suggests they’ve repressed these memories until the trip, where they feel free to reminisce. This reflects the clones’ constrained lives, where even conversations are policed by invisible rules. The episode underscores the theme of institutional control: the clones are conditioned to avoid dwelling on their futures or those who’ve moved on, reinforcing their passive acceptance of their roles as donors. It also foreshadows the inevitability of the characters’ own departures and the silence that will surround them.

    5. Why might Kathy’s narration focus so intently on Ruth’s contradictions, and what does this reveal about their relationship?

    Answer:
    Kathy’s detailed observations of Ruth’s behavior—her false nonchalance, her outbursts, her performative gestures—highlight her role as both a participant and an analyst in their friendship. By exposing Ruth’s contradictions, Kathy subtly critiques Ruth’s attempts to control narratives and emotions, suggesting a mix of frustration and protectiveness. This dynamic reflects the complexity of their bond: Kathy understands Ruth’s vulnerabilities (hence her quick cover-up to Fiona) but also resents her manipulations. The narration underscores Kathy’s growing awareness of the performative aspects of their lives, as well as her own emotional restraint compared to Ruth’s volatility.

    Note