Cover of Never Let Me Go
    DystopianFictionLiterary FictionPhilosophicalScience Fiction

    Never Let Me Go

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo
    Kazuo Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go” is a poignant dystopian novel exploring themes of identity, mortality, and the ethics of human cloning. The story follows Kathy H., a caregiver reflecting on her childhood at Hailsham, an isolated English boarding school where students are raised to become organ donors. As Kathy reconnects with her friends Ruth and Tommy, they confront their predetermined fate and the fleeting nature of their existence. Ishiguro’s restrained prose and subtle world-building underscore the novel’s meditation on love, loss, and what it means to be human. A haunting and thought-provoking work, it challenges readers to consider the moral implications of scientific advancement.

    The chap­ter begins with Kathy reflect­ing on the Nor­folk trip, set­ting the stage for a deep­er explo­ration of the con­cept of “pos­si­bles.” She recalls a con­ver­sa­tion with Ruth, who men­tions that their friends Chrissie and Rod­ney claim to have spot­ted Ruth’s “pos­si­ble” in a town called Cromer. This sparks Kathy’s skep­ti­cism, as she ques­tions the motives behind Chrissie and Rodney’s sto­ry. The idea of “possibles”—individuals who might be the orig­i­nal mod­els from whom they were cloned—is intro­duced, reveal­ing its taboo yet fas­ci­nat­ing nature among the stu­dents at Hail­sham and lat­er at the Cot­tages.

    The chap­ter delves into the stu­dents’ the­o­ries about “pos­si­bles,” high­light­ing the lack of con­sen­sus on how to iden­ti­fy them. Some believe mod­els would be old­er, resem­bling parental fig­ures, while oth­ers argue age is irrel­e­vant. The debate often fiz­zles out as it veers into uncom­fort­able ter­ri­to­ry. The under­ly­ing belief is that find­ing one’s mod­el could offer insight into their iden­ti­ty and future, though this is more sym­bol­ic than lit­er­al. Despite some dis­miss­ing the idea as irrel­e­vant, the fas­ci­na­tion with “pos­si­bles” per­sists, and report­ed sight­ings often come in waves, stir­ring curios­i­ty and spec­u­la­tion.

    Kathy recounts Ruth’s detailed account of Rodney’s alleged sight­ing of her pos­si­ble in an office with a glass front. Ruth is torn about whether to inves­ti­gate fur­ther, while Kathy remains doubt­ful, sus­pect­ing Chrissie and Rod­ney of fab­ri­cat­ing the sto­ry. Kathy’s skep­ti­cism stems from her obser­va­tions of Chrissie’s manip­u­la­tive behav­ior, such as her ten­den­cy to sep­a­rate the group and her exces­sive inter­est in their Hail­sham past. Rod­ney, though lik­able, is por­trayed as over­ly influ­enced by Chrissie, fur­ther cast­ing doubt on their cred­i­bil­i­ty.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Kathy ques­tion­ing the valid­i­ty of the sight­ing, empha­siz­ing her dis­trust of Chrissie and Rodney’s inten­tions. She reflects on their per­son­al­i­ties, not­ing Chrissie’s odd demeanor and Rodney’s sub­servience, which rein­force her belief that the sto­ry might be a ploy. This skep­ti­cism sets the tone for the upcom­ing Nor­folk trip, hint­ing at under­ly­ing ten­sions and the emo­tion­al com­plex­i­ty sur­round­ing the search for “pos­si­bles.” The chap­ter mas­ter­ful­ly blends per­son­al dynam­ics with the broad­er exis­ten­tial themes of iden­ti­ty and des­tiny.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the concept of “possibles” as introduced in Chapter Twelve, and why is it significant to the characters?

      Answer:
      The concept of “possibles” refers to the theory that each clone at Hailsham and the Cottages was modeled after a normal human being, and therefore, there exists somewhere a person who served as their genetic original. The characters believe that by finding their “possible,” they might gain insight into their true identity or future. This idea is significant because it represents their longing for connection to the human world and understanding of their purpose, despite being clones created for organ donation. The topic is treated with both fascination and discomfort, as it touches on their existential questions about identity and fate.

      2. How does Ruth’s reaction to the news about her “possible” reveal her internal conflict?

      Answer:
      Ruth’s reaction is ambivalent—she claims to dismiss the idea of “possibles” as irrelevant, yet she is clearly intrigued when Chrissie and Rodney report seeing someone who might be hers. She lowers her voice when discussing it, indicating secrecy and unease, and admits she doesn’t know whether to pursue the sighting. This contradiction reveals her internal struggle between wanting to believe in a deeper connection to humanity and maintaining emotional distance to protect herself from potential disappointment or existential dread.

      3. Analyze the dynamics between Chrissie, Rodney, and the newcomers (Ruth, Kathy, and others). What underlying tensions exist?

      Answer:
      Chrissie and Rodney, as veterans at the Cottages, exhibit a patronizing and manipulative attitude toward the newcomers, particularly Ruth. Chrissie frequently separates the group members, asks probing questions about Hailsham, and subtly reinforces their outsider status. Rodney, while more likable, blindly supports Chrissie’s behavior. Their reported sighting of Ruth’s “possible” may be another way to exert control or provoke curiosity. Kathy suspects their motives, highlighting the power imbalance and the veterans’ tendency to exoticize the Hailsham students rather than treat them as equals.

      4. Why does Kathy doubt the legitimacy of Chrissie and Rodney’s claim about seeing Ruth’s “possible”?

      Answer:
      Kathy is skeptical because she perceives Chrissie and Rodney as unreliable narrators—Chrissie often manipulates situations, and Rodney follows her lead without question. Additionally, their history of treating the Hailsham students as curiosities makes Kathy question whether the sighting is genuine or just another way to toy with Ruth’s emotions. The vagueness of Rodney’s description (e.g., an open-plan office with many people) further fuels Kathy’s suspicion that the story is fabricated.

      5. How does the theme of identity exploration manifest in this chapter, particularly through the discussion of “possibles”?

      Answer:
      The “possibles” theory serves as a metaphor for the clones’ search for identity and meaning beyond their predetermined roles as donors. By imagining they might resemble or inherit traits from their human models, they grapple with questions of individuality and destiny. The debates about whether to seek their “possibles” reflect deeper anxieties: Are they merely copies, or do they have unique selves? The chapter underscores their yearning for validation and a sense of belonging in a world that treats them as expendable.

    Quotes

    • 1. “The basic idea behind the possibles theory was simple, and didn’t provoke much dispute. It went something like this. Since each of us was copied at some point from a normal person, there must be, for each of us, somewhere out there, a model getting on with his or her life.”

      This quote introduces the central concept of “possibles” in the novel’s universe—the idea that clones are modeled after original humans. It establishes a key philosophical and existential question that haunts the characters: the search for identity and origins in a manufactured existence.

      2. “One big idea behind finding your model was that when you did, you’d glimpse your future… Nevertheless, we all of us, to varying degrees, believed that when you saw the person you were copied from, you’d get some insight into who you were deep down, and maybe too, you’d see something of what your life held in store.”

      This passage reveals the clones’ desperate hope that finding their “possible” might provide meaning or destiny to their predetermined lives. It highlights their human longing for self-understanding despite their artificial origins.

      3. “There were some who thought it stupid to be concerned about possibles at all. Our models were an irrelevance, a technical necessity for bringing us into the world, nothing more than that. It was up to each of us to make of our lives what we could.”

      This contrasting viewpoint shows the ideological divide among clones about their nature and purpose. The pragmatic perspective emphasizes self-determination, creating tension with the more mystical belief in “possibles” as keys to identity.

      4. “Chrissie was a tall girl who was quite beautiful when she stood up to her full height, but she didn’t seem to realise this and spent her time crouching to be the same as the rest of us.”

      This observation about Chrissie’s physical posture serves as a powerful metaphor for the clones’ collective psychology—their instinctive self-diminishment and conformity despite individual potential, reflecting their conditioned existence in society.

    Quotes

    1. “The basic idea behind the possibles theory was simple, and didn’t provoke much dispute. It went something like this. Since each of us was copied at some point from a normal person, there must be, for each of us, somewhere out there, a model getting on with his or her life.”

    This quote introduces the central concept of “possibles” in the novel’s universe—the idea that clones are modeled after original humans. It establishes a key philosophical and existential question that haunts the characters: the search for identity and origins in a manufactured existence.

    2. “One big idea behind finding your model was that when you did, you’d glimpse your future… Nevertheless, we all of us, to varying degrees, believed that when you saw the person you were copied from, you’d get some insight into who you were deep down, and maybe too, you’d see something of what your life held in store.”

    This passage reveals the clones’ desperate hope that finding their “possible” might provide meaning or destiny to their predetermined lives. It highlights their human longing for self-understanding despite their artificial origins.

    3. “There were some who thought it stupid to be concerned about possibles at all. Our models were an irrelevance, a technical necessity for bringing us into the world, nothing more than that. It was up to each of us to make of our lives what we could.”

    This contrasting viewpoint shows the ideological divide among clones about their nature and purpose. The pragmatic perspective emphasizes self-determination, creating tension with the more mystical belief in “possibles” as keys to identity.

    4. “Chrissie was a tall girl who was quite beautiful when she stood up to her full height, but she didn’t seem to realise this and spent her time crouching to be the same as the rest of us.”

    This observation about Chrissie’s physical posture serves as a powerful metaphor for the clones’ collective psychology—their instinctive self-diminishment and conformity despite individual potential, reflecting their conditioned existence in society.

    FAQs

    1. What is the concept of “possibles” as introduced in Chapter Twelve, and why is it significant to the characters?

    Answer:
    The concept of “possibles” refers to the theory that each clone at Hailsham and the Cottages was modeled after a normal human being, and therefore, there exists somewhere a person who served as their genetic original. The characters believe that by finding their “possible,” they might gain insight into their true identity or future. This idea is significant because it represents their longing for connection to the human world and understanding of their purpose, despite being clones created for organ donation. The topic is treated with both fascination and discomfort, as it touches on their existential questions about identity and fate.

    2. How does Ruth’s reaction to the news about her “possible” reveal her internal conflict?

    Answer:
    Ruth’s reaction is ambivalent—she claims to dismiss the idea of “possibles” as irrelevant, yet she is clearly intrigued when Chrissie and Rodney report seeing someone who might be hers. She lowers her voice when discussing it, indicating secrecy and unease, and admits she doesn’t know whether to pursue the sighting. This contradiction reveals her internal struggle between wanting to believe in a deeper connection to humanity and maintaining emotional distance to protect herself from potential disappointment or existential dread.

    3. Analyze the dynamics between Chrissie, Rodney, and the newcomers (Ruth, Kathy, and others). What underlying tensions exist?

    Answer:
    Chrissie and Rodney, as veterans at the Cottages, exhibit a patronizing and manipulative attitude toward the newcomers, particularly Ruth. Chrissie frequently separates the group members, asks probing questions about Hailsham, and subtly reinforces their outsider status. Rodney, while more likable, blindly supports Chrissie’s behavior. Their reported sighting of Ruth’s “possible” may be another way to exert control or provoke curiosity. Kathy suspects their motives, highlighting the power imbalance and the veterans’ tendency to exoticize the Hailsham students rather than treat them as equals.

    4. Why does Kathy doubt the legitimacy of Chrissie and Rodney’s claim about seeing Ruth’s “possible”?

    Answer:
    Kathy is skeptical because she perceives Chrissie and Rodney as unreliable narrators—Chrissie often manipulates situations, and Rodney follows her lead without question. Additionally, their history of treating the Hailsham students as curiosities makes Kathy question whether the sighting is genuine or just another way to toy with Ruth’s emotions. The vagueness of Rodney’s description (e.g., an open-plan office with many people) further fuels Kathy’s suspicion that the story is fabricated.

    5. How does the theme of identity exploration manifest in this chapter, particularly through the discussion of “possibles”?

    Answer:
    The “possibles” theory serves as a metaphor for the clones’ search for identity and meaning beyond their predetermined roles as donors. By imagining they might resemble or inherit traits from their human models, they grapple with questions of individuality and destiny. The debates about whether to seek their “possibles” reflect deeper anxieties: Are they merely copies, or do they have unique selves? The chapter underscores their yearning for validation and a sense of belonging in a world that treats them as expendable.

    Note