Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Never Let Me Go
    DystopianFictionLiterary FictionPhilosophicalScience Fiction

    Never Let Me Go

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo
    Kazuo Ishiguro’s “Never Let Me Go” is a poignant dystopian novel exploring themes of identity, mortality, and the ethics of human cloning. The story follows Kathy H., a caregiver reflecting on her childhood at Hailsham, an isolated English boarding school where students are raised to become organ donors. As Kathy reconnects with her friends Ruth and Tommy, they confront their predetermined fate and the fleeting nature of their existence. Ishiguro’s restrained prose and subtle world-building underscore the novel’s meditation on love, loss, and what it means to be human. A haunting and thought-provoking work, it challenges readers to consider the moral implications of scientific advancement.
    PreviousNext
    Never Let Me Go

    Chapter 2: Two

    by Ishiguro, Kazuo

    The chap­ter begins with Kathy recall­ing an encounter with Tom­my at Hail­sham, a board­ing school, where she approach­es him as part of a self-imposed chal­lenge. Their inter­ac­tion occurs dur­ing a med­ical exam­i­na­tion day, and Tom­my apol­o­gizes for acci­den­tal­ly hit­ting her ear­li­er. Despite Kathy’s ini­tial irri­ta­tion, their brief con­ver­sa­tion on the stairs marks the start of her grow­ing inter­est in Tommy’s strug­gles. The scene high­lights the social dynam­ics among the stu­dents, par­tic­u­lar­ly the pres­sure to con­form to expect­ed behav­iors as they grow old­er.

    Tommy’s sub­se­quent dif­fi­cul­ties at Hail­sham become a focal point. He faces fre­quent bul­ly­ing and iso­la­tion, such as being exclud­ed from run­ning part­ners or hav­ing pranks played on him, some of which are cru­el. Though phys­i­cal­ly strong, Tommy’s tem­per and social awk­ward­ness make him a tar­get. Kathy observes these inci­dents but notes that no one inter­venes, sug­gest­ing a col­lec­tive indif­fer­ence to his plight. This sets the stage for her deep­er involve­ment in Tommy’s life and the under­ly­ing social hier­ar­chies at the school.

    The chap­ter then delves into the impor­tance of the Exchanges, a quar­ter­ly event where stu­dents trade art­work for tokens. These events shape social stand­ing, as cre­ativ­i­ty is high­ly val­ued. Ruth, Kathy’s friend, implies that Tommy’s exclu­sion stems from his lack of par­tic­i­pa­tion in the Exchanges. The sys­tem rein­forces peer val­i­da­tion, where artis­tic out­put deter­mines respect and belong­ing. Kathy reflects on how this cul­ture influ­enced their rela­tion­ships, reveal­ing the sub­tle pres­sures of con­for­mi­ty and the emo­tion­al weight placed on cre­ative expres­sion.

    In the final sec­tion, Kathy and Ruth lat­er rem­i­nisce about the Exchanges, acknowl­edg­ing their sig­nif­i­cance in shap­ing Hailsham’s unique envi­ron­ment. They dis­cuss how even triv­ial cre­ations, like poor­ly spelled poems, were trea­sured, high­light­ing the school’s empha­sis on art and mutu­al appre­ci­a­tion. How­ev­er, Kathy ques­tions the log­ic behind valu­ing such items, hint­ing at deep­er ambi­gu­i­ties in their upbring­ing. This reflec­tion under­scores the chapter’s explo­ration of mem­o­ry, social norms, and the last­ing impact of Hailsham’s cul­ture on its stu­dents.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What incident on the stairs reveals about the social dynamics between Kathy and Tommy, and how does it reflect their maturity levels at age thirteen?

      Answer:
      The stairwell encounter highlights the awkward transition into adolescence at Hailsham. Tommy’s exuberant greeting—a “big open smile” and physical interruption of the stair flow—irritates Kathy because it violates the more reserved social codes expected of thirteen-year-olds (“this was a boy running into a girl in a really public situation”). His childlike apology for hitting her (emphasizing “really, really sorry” repeatedly) contrasts with Kathy’s restrained but diplomatic response (“It’s okay. An accident”). This scene underscores Tommy’s emotional transparency and social clumsiness, while Kathy navigates the interaction with performative maturity, though she later admits his sincerity softened her (“I gave him a smile… no irony”). The dynamic foreshadows Kathy’s protective curiosity toward Tommy’s ongoing struggles.

      2. How do the Exchanges at Hailsham function as both a practical system and a social mechanism, and what does Ruth’s comment about Tommy’s lack of contributions reveal?

      Answer:
      The Exchanges serve dual purposes: they allow students to acquire personal possessions (like artwork for their dormitories) using tokens earned from their creative output, while also reinforcing social hierarchies based on artistic merit. Ruth’s critique of Tommy (“if he wants it to stop, he’s got to change his own attitude”) ties his social ostracization directly to his failure to participate in this system. By not creating items for the Spring Exchange or subsequent events, Tommy violates Hailsham’s unspoken rule that social capital is earned through artistic productivity. The system thus becomes a tool for peer regulation—those who don’t conform (like Tommy) face exclusion, as their disengagement is interpreted as a rejection of communal values (“being dependent on each other to produce… private treasures”).

      3. Analyze the escalation of bullying toward Tommy. How does the narrative frame the student body’s complicity, and what role does Kathy’s perspective play in highlighting this?

      Answer:
      Tommy’s bullying evolves from typical pranks (a worm in cereal) to cruel, dehumanizing acts (the soiled toothbrush), with the student body passively enabling it. Kathy’s observational tone—noting how “no one said anything” despite the nastiness—emphasizes collective complicity. The lack of intervention stems from Tommy’s perceived nonconformity (his tantrums, social isolation during runs) and the implicit permission granted by guardians’ indifference. Kathy’s dormitory attempt to address the issue underscores this dynamic: Ruth deflects blame onto Tommy, reframing abuse as deserved due to his failure to assimilate. The narrative critiques Hailsham’s culture by showing how systemic values (like the Exchange’s emphasis on creativity) justify cruelty under the guise of maintaining order.

      4. In what ways does the chapter use retrospective narration (Kathy’s adult perspective) to deepen the reader’s understanding of Hailsham’s culture? Provide specific examples.

      Answer:
      Kathy’s adult reflections layer irony onto childhood memories, exposing Hailsham’s indoctrination. For instance, she retrospectively questions the logic of valuing “nine-year-old” poetry in the Exchanges, recognizing how the school conditioned them to equate artistic output with personal worth. Her musings on the Exchanges’ “subtle effect” reveal how the system manipulated relationships: students internalized that acceptance required creative productivity. This hindsight also colors her description of Tommy’s bullying; her younger self’s mild embarrassment contrasts with the adult’s implicit critique of systemic failure. The retrospective frame thus invites readers to interrogate Hailsham’s mechanisms, as Kathy’s maturity unveils the institution’s darker underpinnings.

      5. How might the themes of conformity and individuality in this chapter reflect broader societal critiques in Never Let Me Go?

      Answer:
      The chapter microcosmically explores the novel’s central tension between societal demands and individual identity. Hailsham’s Exchange system mirrors wider societal structures that reward compliance (artistic contribution) and punish divergence (Tommy’s exclusion). The students’ collective enforcement of these norms—bullying Tommy while rationalizing it as his fault—parallels how oppressive systems rely on peer surveillance. Kathy’s role as both participant and later critic mirrors the clones’ broader struggle: they’re conditioned to accept their fate, yet glimpses of individuality (like Tommy’s temper) disrupt the facade. The chapter thus foreshadows the novel’s exploration of how institutions strip autonomy under the guise of purpose, whether through creative tokens or organ donations.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I’d found the whole thing mildly embarrassing, but it didn’t lead to any teasing or gossip; and I must admit, if it hadn’t been for that encounter on the stairs, I probably wouldn’t have taken the interest I did in Tommy’s problems over the next several weeks.”

      This quote marks a pivotal moment in Kathy’s relationship with Tommy, showing how a seemingly minor interaction sparks her ongoing attention to his struggles. It foreshadows her deeper involvement in his life and the social dynamics at Hailsham.

      2. “A lot of these were the usual stuff—weird things in his bed, a worm in his cereal—but some of it sounded pointlessly nasty: like the time someone cleaned a toilet with his toothbrush so it was waiting for him with shit all over the bristles.”

      This passage highlights the cruelty of the bullying Tommy endures, emphasizing the harsh social hierarchy at Hailsham. The vivid description underscores the psychological toll on Tommy and the normalization of such behavior among the students.

      3. “If you think about it, being dependent on each other to produce the stuff that might become your private treasures—that’s bound to do things to your relationships.”

      This insight reveals the deeper social mechanics of Hailsham, where creative output becomes currency for social standing. It explains why Tommy’s lack of artistic contributions isolates him and how the Exchange system shapes interpersonal dynamics.

      4. “The way we were encouraged to value each other’s work.”

      Ruth’s reflection encapsulates Hailsham’s ethos, where artistic creation is tied to personal worth. This quote underscores the novel’s exploration of how institutions manipulate identity and relationships through structured systems of validation.

    Quotes

    1. “I’d found the whole thing mildly embarrassing, but it didn’t lead to any teasing or gossip; and I must admit, if it hadn’t been for that encounter on the stairs, I probably wouldn’t have taken the interest I did in Tommy’s problems over the next several weeks.”

    This quote marks a pivotal moment in Kathy’s relationship with Tommy, showing how a seemingly minor interaction sparks her ongoing attention to his struggles. It foreshadows her deeper involvement in his life and the social dynamics at Hailsham.

    2. “A lot of these were the usual stuff—weird things in his bed, a worm in his cereal—but some of it sounded pointlessly nasty: like the time someone cleaned a toilet with his toothbrush so it was waiting for him with shit all over the bristles.”

    This passage highlights the cruelty of the bullying Tommy endures, emphasizing the harsh social hierarchy at Hailsham. The vivid description underscores the psychological toll on Tommy and the normalization of such behavior among the students.

    3. “If you think about it, being dependent on each other to produce the stuff that might become your private treasures—that’s bound to do things to your relationships.”

    This insight reveals the deeper social mechanics of Hailsham, where creative output becomes currency for social standing. It explains why Tommy’s lack of artistic contributions isolates him and how the Exchange system shapes interpersonal dynamics.

    4. “The way we were encouraged to value each other’s work.”

    Ruth’s reflection encapsulates Hailsham’s ethos, where artistic creation is tied to personal worth. This quote underscores the novel’s exploration of how institutions manipulate identity and relationships through structured systems of validation.

    FAQs

    1. What incident on the stairs reveals about the social dynamics between Kathy and Tommy, and how does it reflect their maturity levels at age thirteen?

    Answer:
    The stairwell encounter highlights the awkward transition into adolescence at Hailsham. Tommy’s exuberant greeting—a “big open smile” and physical interruption of the stair flow—irritates Kathy because it violates the more reserved social codes expected of thirteen-year-olds (“this was a boy running into a girl in a really public situation”). His childlike apology for hitting her (emphasizing “really, really sorry” repeatedly) contrasts with Kathy’s restrained but diplomatic response (“It’s okay. An accident”). This scene underscores Tommy’s emotional transparency and social clumsiness, while Kathy navigates the interaction with performative maturity, though she later admits his sincerity softened her (“I gave him a smile… no irony”). The dynamic foreshadows Kathy’s protective curiosity toward Tommy’s ongoing struggles.

    2. How do the Exchanges at Hailsham function as both a practical system and a social mechanism, and what does Ruth’s comment about Tommy’s lack of contributions reveal?

    Answer:
    The Exchanges serve dual purposes: they allow students to acquire personal possessions (like artwork for their dormitories) using tokens earned from their creative output, while also reinforcing social hierarchies based on artistic merit. Ruth’s critique of Tommy (“if he wants it to stop, he’s got to change his own attitude”) ties his social ostracization directly to his failure to participate in this system. By not creating items for the Spring Exchange or subsequent events, Tommy violates Hailsham’s unspoken rule that social capital is earned through artistic productivity. The system thus becomes a tool for peer regulation—those who don’t conform (like Tommy) face exclusion, as their disengagement is interpreted as a rejection of communal values (“being dependent on each other to produce… private treasures”).

    3. Analyze the escalation of bullying toward Tommy. How does the narrative frame the student body’s complicity, and what role does Kathy’s perspective play in highlighting this?

    Answer:
    Tommy’s bullying evolves from typical pranks (a worm in cereal) to cruel, dehumanizing acts (the soiled toothbrush), with the student body passively enabling it. Kathy’s observational tone—noting how “no one said anything” despite the nastiness—emphasizes collective complicity. The lack of intervention stems from Tommy’s perceived nonconformity (his tantrums, social isolation during runs) and the implicit permission granted by guardians’ indifference. Kathy’s dormitory attempt to address the issue underscores this dynamic: Ruth deflects blame onto Tommy, reframing abuse as deserved due to his failure to assimilate. The narrative critiques Hailsham’s culture by showing how systemic values (like the Exchange’s emphasis on creativity) justify cruelty under the guise of maintaining order.

    4. In what ways does the chapter use retrospective narration (Kathy’s adult perspective) to deepen the reader’s understanding of Hailsham’s culture? Provide specific examples.

    Answer:
    Kathy’s adult reflections layer irony onto childhood memories, exposing Hailsham’s indoctrination. For instance, she retrospectively questions the logic of valuing “nine-year-old” poetry in the Exchanges, recognizing how the school conditioned them to equate artistic output with personal worth. Her musings on the Exchanges’ “subtle effect” reveal how the system manipulated relationships: students internalized that acceptance required creative productivity. This hindsight also colors her description of Tommy’s bullying; her younger self’s mild embarrassment contrasts with the adult’s implicit critique of systemic failure. The retrospective frame thus invites readers to interrogate Hailsham’s mechanisms, as Kathy’s maturity unveils the institution’s darker underpinnings.

    5. How might the themes of conformity and individuality in this chapter reflect broader societal critiques in Never Let Me Go?

    Answer:
    The chapter microcosmically explores the novel’s central tension between societal demands and individual identity. Hailsham’s Exchange system mirrors wider societal structures that reward compliance (artistic contribution) and punish divergence (Tommy’s exclusion). The students’ collective enforcement of these norms—bullying Tommy while rationalizing it as his fault—parallels how oppressive systems rely on peer surveillance. Kathy’s role as both participant and later critic mirrors the clones’ broader struggle: they’re conditioned to accept their fate, yet glimpses of individuality (like Tommy’s temper) disrupt the facade. The chapter thus foreshadows the novel’s exploration of how institutions strip autonomy under the guise of purpose, whether through creative tokens or organ donations.

    Note