Cover of [Joe Pickett 18] • The Disappeared
    MysteryThrillerTrue Crime

    [Joe Pickett 18] • The Disappeared

    by C.J., Box,
    In “The Disappeared,” the 18th installment of C.J. Box’s Joe Pickett series, the Wyoming game warden is drawn into a high-stakes investigation when a British tourist vanishes near a luxury ranch. As Pickett delves deeper, he uncovers a web of corporate intrigue, environmental conflict, and local secrets. The novel explores themes of justice, loyalty, and the clash between progress and tradition in the American West. Box’s signature blend of suspense and vivid wilderness storytelling drives this tightly plotted mystery, showcasing Pickett’s unwavering moral compass amid escalating dangers. The book reinforces the series’ reputation for authentic settings and complex, action-driven narratives.

    In Chap­ter 14, “The Dis­ap­peared,” Joe inves­ti­gates the mys­te­ri­ous absence of Steve Pol­lock, a for­mer state game war­den, by vis­it­ing Pollock’s house. After nav­i­gat­ing a snow­drift, Joe attempts to enter the locked garage and house, opt­ing to force his way in dis­creet­ly to avoid bureau­crat­ic delays. He ques­tions his own motives, won­der­ing if Pollock’s dis­ap­pear­ance could be linked to Kate Shelford-Longden’s case, though the con­nec­tion seems ten­u­ous. Joe’s actions reflect his deter­mi­na­tion to uncov­er the truth, even as he acknowl­edges the lack of clear jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for his inves­ti­ga­tion.

    Inside Pollock’s truck, Joe notes its unusu­al­ly neat con­di­tion, con­trast­ing it with the typ­i­cal clut­ter of game war­den vehi­cles. He search­es for clues, review­ing Pollock’s cita­tion book but find­ing only rou­tine vio­la­tions. The absence of per­son­al and pro­fes­sion­al mate­ri­als puz­zles Joe, sug­gest­ing some­one may have tam­pered with the truck. This dis­cov­ery deep­ens the mys­tery, leav­ing Joe to won­der whether Pol­lock cleaned it out him­self or if some­one else had been there before him.

    Enter­ing the house, Joe observes signs of a hasty depar­ture, such as emp­ty dress­er draw­ers and spoiled food in the fridge. The home’s sparse and order­ly state aligns with Pollock’s soli­tary lifestyle, but the miss­ing agency-issued weapons and selec­tive pack­ing raise red flags. Joe method­i­cal­ly search­es each room, not­ing details that imply Pol­lock left unex­pect­ed­ly, pos­si­bly under duress or with a spe­cif­ic pur­pose in mind. The chap­ter builds ten­sion as Joe pieces togeth­er frag­ments of Pollock’s life, search­ing for answers.

    The chap­ter under­scores Joe’s grow­ing sus­pi­cion that Pollock’s dis­ap­pear­ance is more than a sim­ple res­ig­na­tion or per­son­al deci­sion. The lack of evi­dence link­ing Pol­lock to Kate’s case frus­trates Joe, yet he remains com­pelled to explore every angle. His unau­tho­rized inves­ti­ga­tion risks back­lash from his supe­ri­ors, but his instincts dri­ve him for­ward. The chap­ter ends with Joe’s unre­solved ques­tions, set­ting the stage for fur­ther rev­e­la­tions about Pollock’s fate and its poten­tial con­nec­tion to the larg­er mys­tery.

    FAQs

    • 1. What investigative methods does Joe use to examine Steve Pollock’s house and truck, and what do these methods reveal about his approach to the case?

      Answer:
      Joe employs both physical and deductive methods in his investigation. He forces entry into Pollock’s garage by shouldering through the door, demonstrating his urgency and willingness to bypass official procedures. Inside the truck, he meticulously examines the contents, noting its unusual cleanliness and missing items typical of a game warden’s vehicle (e.g., paperwork, maps). In the house, he checks the thermostat, refrigerator, and closet, piecing together clues about Pollock’s sudden departure (e.g., spoiled milk, empty drawers for underwear). These methods reveal Joe’s hands-on, intuitive approach—prioritizing speed and direct observation over bureaucratic channels, while also showing his attention to detail in assessing anomalies.


      2. How does the state of Pollock’s truck contrast with Joe’s expectations, and what might this imply about Pollock’s disappearance?

      Answer:
      Joe expects Pollock’s truck to be cluttered with tools, maps, and paperwork, as game wardens typically use their vehicles as mobile offices. Instead, he finds it “remarkably neat and clean,” with missing items like a briefcase. This discrepancy suggests two possibilities: either Pollock was unusually tidy (which Joe doubts), or someone—Pollock or another party—had sanitized the truck before Joe’s inspection. The latter implies Pollock may have planned his disappearance or was covering his tracks, or that someone else removed evidence. The absence of “bad blood” citations in Pollock’s logbook further deepens the mystery, as Joe expected to find conflicts that might explain his vanishing.


      3. Why does Joe feel justified in investigating Pollock’s disappearance alongside Kate’s, despite the risk of scrutiny from Connor Hanlon?

      Answer:
      Joe rationalizes his focus on Pollock through two lenses: personal intuition and professional logic. Subjectively, he finds Pollock’s absence “as puzzling as Kate’s,” sensing an unresolved mystery. Professionally, he cites the “remote but possible chance” the cases are connected—perhaps Pollock encountered Kate during patrol or at a bar. Though he acknowledges Hanlon would question this prioritization, Joe’s instinct drives him to explore all angles, including whether Pollock had a “dark side” or fled due to guilt. This reflects Joe’s character as an investigator who trusts his hunches, even when they defy conventional procedure.


      4. Analyze the significance of the garage entry routine described in the chapter. What does it reveal about Pollock’s professional habits and the culture of game wardens?

      Answer:
      The text notes that Pollock likely entered his house through the garage to conceal his truck, a tactic Joe recognizes as standard for wardens. This habit underscores the adversarial dynamic between wardens and potential violators in hunting communities: if violators can’t see the warden’s vehicle, they can’t assume he’s off-duty. Pollock’s adherence to this routine highlights his professionalism and awareness of local surveillance. Conversely, the unlocked garage door suggests he left in haste or expected to return soon. The detail enriches the setting, emphasizing the high-stakes, cat-and-mouse nature of wildlife law enforcement.


      5. Evaluate the evidence suggesting Pollock’s disappearance was abrupt versus premeditated. Which details support each interpretation?

      Answer:
      Abrupt disappearance: The spoiled milk, unfinished laundry, and stocked freezer imply Pollock left suddenly, without time to clear perishables or pack thoroughly. The unlocked garage door and intact household items (e.g., uniforms, dry-cleaned suit) also suggest an unplanned exit.
      Premeditated disappearance: The truck’s suspicious cleanliness and missing paperwork hint at deliberate removal of evidence. The empty underwear drawer and selective packing (e.g., no weapons mentioned) could indicate careful preparation. The dichotomy leaves Joe—and the reader—uncertain, amplifying the mystery.
      The chapter leans toward abruptness but plants doubt through Joe’s observations, inviting deeper scrutiny of Pollock’s motives.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Which was a good question, he thought. Almost as good as why he’d been sent to Saratoga in the first place. But Pollock’s sudden absence was, to Joe, as puzzling as Kate’s.”

      This quote captures Joe’s internal conflict and the central mystery driving his investigation. It highlights the parallel between the two disappearances and raises questions about the true purpose of his assignment.

      2. “Either Steve Pollock was the neatest and tidiest game warden in the state of Wyoming, Joe thought, or someone had already been through his truck and removed most of the contents.”

      This observation reveals Joe’s growing suspicion that something is amiss with Pollock’s disappearance. The quote contrasts typical warden behavior with Pollock’s suspiciously clean truck, suggesting foul play or deliberate evidence removal.

      3. “Saratoga, like Saddlestring, was a hunting-and-fishing community. Locals kept close track of where the game warden patrolled—especially potential violators.”

      This quote provides important context about the setting and the cat-and-mouse dynamic between wardens and locals. It explains Pollock’s garage parking strategy and hints at potential motives for his disappearance.

      4. “As he’d guessed the day before, it appeared that Pollock had simply walked out of the house. There were still clothes, including uniform shirts, in the bedroom closet… Two of the dresser drawers were empty. He’d taken his underwear.”

      This detailed observation shows Joe’s detective skills at work. The selective nature of what Pollock took suggests a planned departure rather than an abduction, deepening the mystery of his disappearance.

    Quotes

    1. “Which was a good question, he thought. Almost as good as why he’d been sent to Saratoga in the first place. But Pollock’s sudden absence was, to Joe, as puzzling as Kate’s.”

    This quote captures Joe’s internal conflict and the central mystery driving his investigation. It highlights the parallel between the two disappearances and raises questions about the true purpose of his assignment.

    2. “Either Steve Pollock was the neatest and tidiest game warden in the state of Wyoming, Joe thought, or someone had already been through his truck and removed most of the contents.”

    This observation reveals Joe’s growing suspicion that something is amiss with Pollock’s disappearance. The quote contrasts typical warden behavior with Pollock’s suspiciously clean truck, suggesting foul play or deliberate evidence removal.

    3. “Saratoga, like Saddlestring, was a hunting-and-fishing community. Locals kept close track of where the game warden patrolled—especially potential violators.”

    This quote provides important context about the setting and the cat-and-mouse dynamic between wardens and locals. It explains Pollock’s garage parking strategy and hints at potential motives for his disappearance.

    4. “As he’d guessed the day before, it appeared that Pollock had simply walked out of the house. There were still clothes, including uniform shirts, in the bedroom closet… Two of the dresser drawers were empty. He’d taken his underwear.”

    This detailed observation shows Joe’s detective skills at work. The selective nature of what Pollock took suggests a planned departure rather than an abduction, deepening the mystery of his disappearance.

    FAQs

    1. What investigative methods does Joe use to examine Steve Pollock’s house and truck, and what do these methods reveal about his approach to the case?

    Answer:
    Joe employs both physical and deductive methods in his investigation. He forces entry into Pollock’s garage by shouldering through the door, demonstrating his urgency and willingness to bypass official procedures. Inside the truck, he meticulously examines the contents, noting its unusual cleanliness and missing items typical of a game warden’s vehicle (e.g., paperwork, maps). In the house, he checks the thermostat, refrigerator, and closet, piecing together clues about Pollock’s sudden departure (e.g., spoiled milk, empty drawers for underwear). These methods reveal Joe’s hands-on, intuitive approach—prioritizing speed and direct observation over bureaucratic channels, while also showing his attention to detail in assessing anomalies.


    2. How does the state of Pollock’s truck contrast with Joe’s expectations, and what might this imply about Pollock’s disappearance?

    Answer:
    Joe expects Pollock’s truck to be cluttered with tools, maps, and paperwork, as game wardens typically use their vehicles as mobile offices. Instead, he finds it “remarkably neat and clean,” with missing items like a briefcase. This discrepancy suggests two possibilities: either Pollock was unusually tidy (which Joe doubts), or someone—Pollock or another party—had sanitized the truck before Joe’s inspection. The latter implies Pollock may have planned his disappearance or was covering his tracks, or that someone else removed evidence. The absence of “bad blood” citations in Pollock’s logbook further deepens the mystery, as Joe expected to find conflicts that might explain his vanishing.


    3. Why does Joe feel justified in investigating Pollock’s disappearance alongside Kate’s, despite the risk of scrutiny from Connor Hanlon?

    Answer:
    Joe rationalizes his focus on Pollock through two lenses: personal intuition and professional logic. Subjectively, he finds Pollock’s absence “as puzzling as Kate’s,” sensing an unresolved mystery. Professionally, he cites the “remote but possible chance” the cases are connected—perhaps Pollock encountered Kate during patrol or at a bar. Though he acknowledges Hanlon would question this prioritization, Joe’s instinct drives him to explore all angles, including whether Pollock had a “dark side” or fled due to guilt. This reflects Joe’s character as an investigator who trusts his hunches, even when they defy conventional procedure.


    4. Analyze the significance of the garage entry routine described in the chapter. What does it reveal about Pollock’s professional habits and the culture of game wardens?

    Answer:
    The text notes that Pollock likely entered his house through the garage to conceal his truck, a tactic Joe recognizes as standard for wardens. This habit underscores the adversarial dynamic between wardens and potential violators in hunting communities: if violators can’t see the warden’s vehicle, they can’t assume he’s off-duty. Pollock’s adherence to this routine highlights his professionalism and awareness of local surveillance. Conversely, the unlocked garage door suggests he left in haste or expected to return soon. The detail enriches the setting, emphasizing the high-stakes, cat-and-mouse nature of wildlife law enforcement.


    5. Evaluate the evidence suggesting Pollock’s disappearance was abrupt versus premeditated. Which details support each interpretation?

    Answer:
    Abrupt disappearance: The spoiled milk, unfinished laundry, and stocked freezer imply Pollock left suddenly, without time to clear perishables or pack thoroughly. The unlocked garage door and intact household items (e.g., uniforms, dry-cleaned suit) also suggest an unplanned exit.
    Premeditated disappearance: The truck’s suspicious cleanliness and missing paperwork hint at deliberate removal of evidence. The empty underwear drawer and selective packing (e.g., no weapons mentioned) could indicate careful preparation. The dichotomy leaves Joe—and the reader—uncertain, amplifying the mystery.
    The chapter leans toward abruptness but plants doubt through Joe’s observations, inviting deeper scrutiny of Pollock’s motives.

    Note