Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    The epi­logue opens with Stone enjoy­ing a peace­ful morn­ing in his Tur­tle Bay gar­den, reflect­ing on Allison’s dis­ap­pear­ance and his unan­swered attempts to con­tact her. His sec­re­tary, Alma, deliv­ers a sub­stan­tial check from the sale of a yacht, spark­ing a light­heart­ed exchange about their new­found wealth. Stone allo­cates por­tions of the mon­ey to set­tle debts and tax­es, humor­ous­ly lament­ing the lat­ter, while con­sid­er­ing pur­chas­ing an air­plane. The scene shifts as Stone inves­ti­gates his garage, only to be inter­rupt­ed by an unex­pect­ed visitor—Jim For­rester, who quick­ly reveals him­self to be Paul Man­ning in dis­guise.

    Stone con­fronts Man­ning about his true iden­ti­ty, ref­er­enc­ing dis­crep­an­cies in his back­ground and a year­book pho­to that expos­es his decep­tion. Man­ning, now cor­nered, admits to his elab­o­rate ruse but remains eva­sive about his motives. The ten­sion esca­lates as Stone refus­es to rep­re­sent him legal­ly, rec­og­niz­ing Man­ning’s attempt to exploit attor­ney-client priv­i­lege. Their con­ver­sa­tion reveals Man­ning’s bit­ter­ness toward Alli­son, whom he believes thwart­ed his finan­cial plans by mov­ing funds from their shared account before her tri­al.

    The dia­logue delves into Man­ning’s metic­u­lous plan­ning, includ­ing weight loss and forged iden­ti­ties, to evade detec­tion. Stone deduces that Man­ning staged the theft of his dinghy in Las Pal­mas as part of his escape plan. Man­ning’s frus­tra­tion peaks as he real­izes Alli­son may still be alive, out­smart­ing him just as he had intend­ed to out­smart oth­ers. Stone taunts him about the chal­lenges of track­ing her down, giv­en the skills Man­ning him­self taught her.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Man­ning’s unre­solved anger and Stone’s qui­et tri­umph in unrav­el­ing the truth. The encounter under­scores themes of decep­tion and ret­ri­bu­tion, leav­ing Man­ning’s future uncer­tain and Stone sat­is­fied with his own inves­tiga­tive prowess. The epi­logue ties up loose ends while hint­ing at the lin­ger­ing con­se­quences of Man­ning’s actions, main­tain­ing the nov­el­’s sus­pense­ful and intro­spec­tive tone.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Stone’s financial situation change at the beginning of the chapter, and what does this reveal about his character?

      Answer:
      Stone receives a check for \(1.8 million from the sale of Paul Manning's yacht, significantly improving his financial situation. His immediate actions—paying off a debt to Libby Manning's mother (\)375,000), sending \(540,000 to the IRS, and investing \)200,000—demonstrate his ethical responsibility and financial prudence. His lighthearted exchange with Alma about buying an airplane (“We’re not rich anymore”) shows his humor and practicality. This scene reveals Stone as a morally grounded individual who prioritizes obligations over extravagance, despite his sudden wealth.

      2. What critical revelation does Stone make about Jim Forrester’s true identity, and how does this impact their interaction?

      Answer:
      Stone exposes that “Jim Forrester” is actually Paul Manning in disguise, having verified through alumni records that no James Forrester attended Syracuse University. This revelation shifts their conversation from polite pretense to direct confrontation. Stone’s mention of Manning’s basketball photo and altered appearance (weight loss, beard removal) forces Manning to drop his facade. The interaction becomes tense as Stone demonstrates his investigative skills, while Manning’s evasive responses (“Must be some mistake”) reveal his desperation to maintain his cover despite being caught.

      3. Analyze the significance of the dinghy and sail repair details in Stone’s realization about Manning’s scheme.

      Answer:
      The repaired headsail reefing swivel and the “stolen” dinghy in Las Palmas were key clues for Stone. Manning had faked the dinghy theft to create an alibi while secretly using it to return to the Canaries after setting Expansive adrift. This detail, combined with the distinctive sail repair, proved Manning had been aboard the yacht—contradicting his supposed death. These nautical specifics highlight Stone’s observational skills and how Manning’s overconfidence in his plan’s perfection led to its unraveling through small, overlooked details.

      4. How does Manning’s reaction to Allison’s possible survival reflect his motivations throughout the story?

      Answer:
      Manning’s outburst (“Damn Allison!”) and his frustration over her moving the Cayman Islands money reveal his primary motivation: financial gain. His venomous tone suggests betrayal, as Allison outmaneuvered him by securing the funds before her trial. This reaction underscores Manning’s greed and entitlement—he views Allison as both a pawn and a thief. His remark (“She’s not dead, is she?”) confirms his willingness to kill for money, while Stone’s taunt about her new identity highlights Manning’s ironic downfall: his own methods of deception were used against him.

      5. What strategic purpose does Stone’s call to Dino serve in this confrontation scene?

      Answer:
      When Stone asks Alma to tell Dino to arrive in five minutes “with his friends,” it serves as a subtle threat to Manning. The mention of “friends” implies law enforcement backup, pressuring Manning to leave before being arrested. This maneuver shows Stone’s tactical thinking—he avoids direct conflict but signals he has the upper hand. Manning’s subsequent shift to requesting legal representation (“to find out if you would represent me”) is a desperate attempt to exploit attorney-client privilege, which Stone refuses, further isolating Manning and forcing him to flee (“Not where I’m going”).

    Quotes

    • 1. “‘God, how proud I am to be an American and pay my taxes!’”

      This sarcastic remark from Stone highlights his frustration with the financial burden of taxes, even after receiving a windfall. It adds a touch of humor while revealing his pragmatic attitude toward wealth.

      2. “‘When I’ve been had, I like to know why and by whom.’”

      Stone’s statement underscores his investigative nature and determination to uncover the truth about Forrester’s (Paul Manning’s) deception. It marks a turning point in the chapter where Stone confronts Manning’s lies.

      3. “‘Suppose she’s not? I doubt if you could find her. After all, you must have given her lessons in how to obtain a real U.S. passport, how to establish new identities, and all that.’”

      This quote reveals Stone’s realization that Allison may have outmaneuvered Manning using the very skills he taught her. It’s a pivotal moment that exposes Manning’s hubris and the irony of his situation.

      4. “‘Damn Allison!’ Manning said suddenly, and with some venom.”

      Manning’s outburst captures his rage and helplessness as he realizes Allison has escaped with the money. This emotional reaction underscores the chapter’s tension and the consequences of his own actions.

    Quotes

    1. “‘God, how proud I am to be an American and pay my taxes!’”

    This sarcastic remark from Stone highlights his frustration with the financial burden of taxes, even after receiving a windfall. It adds a touch of humor while revealing his pragmatic attitude toward wealth.

    2. “‘When I’ve been had, I like to know why and by whom.’”

    Stone’s statement underscores his investigative nature and determination to uncover the truth about Forrester’s (Paul Manning’s) deception. It marks a turning point in the chapter where Stone confronts Manning’s lies.

    3. “‘Suppose she’s not? I doubt if you could find her. After all, you must have given her lessons in how to obtain a real U.S. passport, how to establish new identities, and all that.’”

    This quote reveals Stone’s realization that Allison may have outmaneuvered Manning using the very skills he taught her. It’s a pivotal moment that exposes Manning’s hubris and the irony of his situation.

    4. “‘Damn Allison!’ Manning said suddenly, and with some venom.”

    Manning’s outburst captures his rage and helplessness as he realizes Allison has escaped with the money. This emotional reaction underscores the chapter’s tension and the consequences of his own actions.

    FAQs

    1. How does Stone’s financial situation change at the beginning of the chapter, and what does this reveal about his character?

    Answer:
    Stone receives a check for \(1.8 million from the sale of Paul Manning's yacht, significantly improving his financial situation. His immediate actions—paying off a debt to Libby Manning's mother (\)375,000), sending \(540,000 to the IRS, and investing \)200,000—demonstrate his ethical responsibility and financial prudence. His lighthearted exchange with Alma about buying an airplane (“We’re not rich anymore”) shows his humor and practicality. This scene reveals Stone as a morally grounded individual who prioritizes obligations over extravagance, despite his sudden wealth.

    2. What critical revelation does Stone make about Jim Forrester’s true identity, and how does this impact their interaction?

    Answer:
    Stone exposes that “Jim Forrester” is actually Paul Manning in disguise, having verified through alumni records that no James Forrester attended Syracuse University. This revelation shifts their conversation from polite pretense to direct confrontation. Stone’s mention of Manning’s basketball photo and altered appearance (weight loss, beard removal) forces Manning to drop his facade. The interaction becomes tense as Stone demonstrates his investigative skills, while Manning’s evasive responses (“Must be some mistake”) reveal his desperation to maintain his cover despite being caught.

    3. Analyze the significance of the dinghy and sail repair details in Stone’s realization about Manning’s scheme.

    Answer:
    The repaired headsail reefing swivel and the “stolen” dinghy in Las Palmas were key clues for Stone. Manning had faked the dinghy theft to create an alibi while secretly using it to return to the Canaries after setting Expansive adrift. This detail, combined with the distinctive sail repair, proved Manning had been aboard the yacht—contradicting his supposed death. These nautical specifics highlight Stone’s observational skills and how Manning’s overconfidence in his plan’s perfection led to its unraveling through small, overlooked details.

    4. How does Manning’s reaction to Allison’s possible survival reflect his motivations throughout the story?

    Answer:
    Manning’s outburst (“Damn Allison!”) and his frustration over her moving the Cayman Islands money reveal his primary motivation: financial gain. His venomous tone suggests betrayal, as Allison outmaneuvered him by securing the funds before her trial. This reaction underscores Manning’s greed and entitlement—he views Allison as both a pawn and a thief. His remark (“She’s not dead, is she?”) confirms his willingness to kill for money, while Stone’s taunt about her new identity highlights Manning’s ironic downfall: his own methods of deception were used against him.

    5. What strategic purpose does Stone’s call to Dino serve in this confrontation scene?

    Answer:
    When Stone asks Alma to tell Dino to arrive in five minutes “with his friends,” it serves as a subtle threat to Manning. The mention of “friends” implies law enforcement backup, pressuring Manning to leave before being arrested. This maneuver shows Stone’s tactical thinking—he avoids direct conflict but signals he has the upper hand. Manning’s subsequent shift to requesting legal representation (“to find out if you would represent me”) is a desperate attempt to exploit attorney-client privilege, which Stone refuses, further isolating Manning and forcing him to flee (“Not where I’m going”).

    Note