Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.
    PreviousNext
    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    Chapter 58

    by Stuart, Woods,

    The chap­ter opens with Alli­son col­laps­ing in court after being con­vict­ed, prompt­ing Stone and the bailiff to rush to her aid. She is car­ried on a stretch­er to a jail cell, where she grad­u­al­ly regains con­scious­ness, feel­ing weak and dis­ori­ent­ed. Stone reas­sures her that her appeal has been sent to the prime min­is­ter, though he pri­vate­ly wor­ries about the ham­mer­ing sounds out­side, hint­ing at prepa­ra­tions for her exe­cu­tion. Alli­son eats a meal pro­vid­ed by a kind jail work­er while Stone and Sir Leslie try to com­fort her, though the ten­sion in the scene is pal­pa­ble.

    Stone leaves the jail to gath­er Allison’s per­son­al belong­ings and make urgent phone calls to ral­ly sup­port for her appeal. He encoun­ters jour­nal­ists Hilary Kramer and Jim For­rester, who express shock at the ver­dict. Stone strate­gizes with For­rester to lever­age media pres­sure, sug­gest­ing trav­el edi­tors protest the poten­tial harm to St. Marks’ tourism. Kramer agrees to expe­dite a news piece con­demn­ing the ver­dict, while Stone deliv­ers a pas­sion­ate quote empha­siz­ing the injus­tice of Allison’s con­vic­tion and urg­ing pub­lic out­cry.

    Return­ing to the mari­na, Stone uses a satel­lite phone to con­tact his col­league Bill Eggers in the U.S., out­lin­ing a fran­tic plan to mobi­lize polit­i­cal and media pres­sure. He instructs Eggers to involve the State Depart­ment, sen­a­tors, and PR teams to flood the prime min­is­ter with protests, hop­ing to sway the appeal. Stone’s des­per­a­tion is clear as he empha­sizes the urgency of the sit­u­a­tion, know­ing Allison’s life hangs in the bal­ance.

    The chap­ter clos­es with Stone gath­er­ing Allison’s belong­ings and return­ing to the jail late at night, only to find the door locked. A sleepy guard reluc­tant­ly lets him in, under­scor­ing the bureau­crat­ic indif­fer­ence sur­round­ing Allison’s plight. The scene under­scores the race against time as Stone works tire­less­ly to over­turn the ver­dict, while the omi­nous ham­mer­ing lingers as a grim reminder of what awaits if he fails.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What immediate actions does Stone take after Allison faints in the courtroom, and what does this reveal about his character?

      Answer:
      Stone quickly rushes to Allison’s side when she faints, demonstrating his protective nature and quick response in emergencies. He slaps her cheeks lightly to check her responsiveness and insists on getting a doctor, showing his concern for her well-being. When the bailiff dismisses the need for medical attention, Stone helps carry Allison to a cell where he continues to monitor her pulse and comfort her. These actions reveal Stone as a compassionate, hands-on professional who prioritizes Allison’s immediate needs while remaining calm under pressure. His practical care (placing a pillow, checking her pulse) combined with emotional support (reassuring words) shows his multidimensional approach to crisis situations.

      2. How does the chapter build suspense regarding Allison’s impending execution, and what specific details contribute to this tension?

      Answer:
      The chapter masterfully builds suspense through several ominous details. The hammering sound from the courtyard—which Stone recognizes but lies about to Allison—implies the construction of gallows, a chilling dramatic irony. The rushed timeline (“less than twenty-four hours”) and Stone’s desperate phone call to mobilize international intervention create a countdown effect. Secondary characters’ reactions heighten tension: Jim Forrester’s pallor, Hilary Kramer’s willingness to “break some legs” to publish immediately, and even the jail staff’s casual dismissal of medical help all underscore the gravity of the situation. The juxtaposition of mundane acts (Allison eating stew) with life-or-death stakes (the hidden appeal copy) intensifies the emotional impact.

      3. Analyze Stone’s media strategy to save Allison. What three-pronged approach does he implement, and why might this be effective?

      Answer:
      Stone orchestrates a multifaceted media campaign targeting:

      1. Political channels: He directs Bill Eggers to alert the State Department and key senators (Helms, Dodd, Lieberman) to apply diplomatic pressure, recognizing that high-level U.S. government intervention could sway the prime minister.
      2. Public opinion: By having Hilary Kramer publish an outraged article and Jim Forrester contact travel editors, he aims to generate widespread outrage that paints St. Marks as unjust and dangerous to Americans.
      3. Economic leverage: The emphasis on damaging tourist trade (“no American will ever be safe”) targets the island’s financial vulnerability. This approach is effective because it attacks the problem from multiple angles—political, reputational, and economic—making clemency the path of least resistance for the prime minister.

      4. What symbolic significance does Allison’s meal of fish stew hold in this chapter, particularly in contrast to other events unfolding?

      Answer:
      The fish stew serves as a powerful symbol of normalcy and humanity amidst the surreal horror of Allison’s situation. While officials hammer together execution equipment unseen, the simple act of a female jail worker (“woman in a denim shift”) personally preparing food for Allison introduces compassion into the institutional setting. Allison’s comment about “lots of fish in it” highlights her attempt to focus on tangible, immediate sensations rather than her impending doom. The meal also represents sustenance for the coming battle—both literally strengthening Allison and metaphorically fueling the fight for her life, as Stone immediately leaves to mobilize resources after seeing her eat. This ordinary moment becomes profoundly poignant against the backdrop of extraordinary circumstances.

      5. How does the chapter use secondary characters like Thomas, Sir Leslie, and Jim Forrester to expand the narrative’s impact beyond Stone and Allison’s immediate drama?

      Answer:
      Secondary characters serve as emotional barometers and plot accelerants. Thomas’s quiet loyalty (waiting outside, arranging transportation) and Sir Leslie’s practical care (fetching food, bringing a chair) create a support network that contrasts with the impersonal justice system. Jim Forrester’s visceral reaction—turning pale under his tan—externalizes the shock that Stone must suppress to function, while his travel industry connections become instrumental in Stone’s strategy. These characters also widen the story’s scope: Thomas’s interaction with the chartered yacht crew hints at escape possibilities, Sir Leslie’s legal efforts show professional dedication beyond the courtroom, and Forrester’s media ties bridge the local crisis to international attention. Their varied responses (practical, emotional, professional) make the situation feel more real and consequential.

    Quotes

    • 1. “An American jury would have acquitted you in minutes.”

      This quote highlights Stone’s shock and indignation at the unjust verdict, emphasizing the cultural and legal disparity between St. Marks and the U.S. It underscores the chapter’s central tension of an American facing harsh foreign justice.

      2. “If this happens, no American will ever be safe in St. Marks again.”

      Stone’s powerful statement to the press captures the diplomatic stakes of the situation. It represents his strategy to mobilize international pressure by framing the verdict as a threat to all American travelers.

      3. “I want the prime minister to wake up tomorrow morning to the sound of his phone ringing; I want his fax machine flooded with indignant letters; I want to scare the living shit out of him.”

      This urgent directive to Bill Eggers reveals Stone’s desperate strategy to leverage political pressure. The visceral language demonstrates the high-stakes race against time to prevent an execution.

      4. “The defense is absolutely shocked at this outrageous verdict… an innocent American woman who has already been devastated by the entirely natural death of her husband.”

      Stone’s carefully crafted press statement summarizes the chapter’s core arguments: the verdict’s injustice, Allison’s innocence, and the need for public outcry. It’s designed to generate maximum sympathy and political pressure.

    Quotes

    1. “An American jury would have acquitted you in minutes.”

    This quote highlights Stone’s shock and indignation at the unjust verdict, emphasizing the cultural and legal disparity between St. Marks and the U.S. It underscores the chapter’s central tension of an American facing harsh foreign justice.

    2. “If this happens, no American will ever be safe in St. Marks again.”

    Stone’s powerful statement to the press captures the diplomatic stakes of the situation. It represents his strategy to mobilize international pressure by framing the verdict as a threat to all American travelers.

    3. “I want the prime minister to wake up tomorrow morning to the sound of his phone ringing; I want his fax machine flooded with indignant letters; I want to scare the living shit out of him.”

    This urgent directive to Bill Eggers reveals Stone’s desperate strategy to leverage political pressure. The visceral language demonstrates the high-stakes race against time to prevent an execution.

    4. “The defense is absolutely shocked at this outrageous verdict… an innocent American woman who has already been devastated by the entirely natural death of her husband.”

    Stone’s carefully crafted press statement summarizes the chapter’s core arguments: the verdict’s injustice, Allison’s innocence, and the need for public outcry. It’s designed to generate maximum sympathy and political pressure.

    FAQs

    1. What immediate actions does Stone take after Allison faints in the courtroom, and what does this reveal about his character?

    Answer:
    Stone quickly rushes to Allison’s side when she faints, demonstrating his protective nature and quick response in emergencies. He slaps her cheeks lightly to check her responsiveness and insists on getting a doctor, showing his concern for her well-being. When the bailiff dismisses the need for medical attention, Stone helps carry Allison to a cell where he continues to monitor her pulse and comfort her. These actions reveal Stone as a compassionate, hands-on professional who prioritizes Allison’s immediate needs while remaining calm under pressure. His practical care (placing a pillow, checking her pulse) combined with emotional support (reassuring words) shows his multidimensional approach to crisis situations.

    2. How does the chapter build suspense regarding Allison’s impending execution, and what specific details contribute to this tension?

    Answer:
    The chapter masterfully builds suspense through several ominous details. The hammering sound from the courtyard—which Stone recognizes but lies about to Allison—implies the construction of gallows, a chilling dramatic irony. The rushed timeline (“less than twenty-four hours”) and Stone’s desperate phone call to mobilize international intervention create a countdown effect. Secondary characters’ reactions heighten tension: Jim Forrester’s pallor, Hilary Kramer’s willingness to “break some legs” to publish immediately, and even the jail staff’s casual dismissal of medical help all underscore the gravity of the situation. The juxtaposition of mundane acts (Allison eating stew) with life-or-death stakes (the hidden appeal copy) intensifies the emotional impact.

    3. Analyze Stone’s media strategy to save Allison. What three-pronged approach does he implement, and why might this be effective?

    Answer:
    Stone orchestrates a multifaceted media campaign targeting:

    1. Political channels: He directs Bill Eggers to alert the State Department and key senators (Helms, Dodd, Lieberman) to apply diplomatic pressure, recognizing that high-level U.S. government intervention could sway the prime minister.
    2. Public opinion: By having Hilary Kramer publish an outraged article and Jim Forrester contact travel editors, he aims to generate widespread outrage that paints St. Marks as unjust and dangerous to Americans.
    3. Economic leverage: The emphasis on damaging tourist trade (“no American will ever be safe”) targets the island’s financial vulnerability. This approach is effective because it attacks the problem from multiple angles—political, reputational, and economic—making clemency the path of least resistance for the prime minister.

    4. What symbolic significance does Allison’s meal of fish stew hold in this chapter, particularly in contrast to other events unfolding?

    Answer:
    The fish stew serves as a powerful symbol of normalcy and humanity amidst the surreal horror of Allison’s situation. While officials hammer together execution equipment unseen, the simple act of a female jail worker (“woman in a denim shift”) personally preparing food for Allison introduces compassion into the institutional setting. Allison’s comment about “lots of fish in it” highlights her attempt to focus on tangible, immediate sensations rather than her impending doom. The meal also represents sustenance for the coming battle—both literally strengthening Allison and metaphorically fueling the fight for her life, as Stone immediately leaves to mobilize resources after seeing her eat. This ordinary moment becomes profoundly poignant against the backdrop of extraordinary circumstances.

    5. How does the chapter use secondary characters like Thomas, Sir Leslie, and Jim Forrester to expand the narrative’s impact beyond Stone and Allison’s immediate drama?

    Answer:
    Secondary characters serve as emotional barometers and plot accelerants. Thomas’s quiet loyalty (waiting outside, arranging transportation) and Sir Leslie’s practical care (fetching food, bringing a chair) create a support network that contrasts with the impersonal justice system. Jim Forrester’s visceral reaction—turning pale under his tan—externalizes the shock that Stone must suppress to function, while his travel industry connections become instrumental in Stone’s strategy. These characters also widen the story’s scope: Thomas’s interaction with the chartered yacht crew hints at escape possibilities, Sir Leslie’s legal efforts show professional dedication beyond the courtroom, and Forrester’s media ties bridge the local crisis to international attention. Their varied responses (practical, emotional, professional) make the situation feel more real and consequential.

    Note