Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    In Chap­ter 55, Stone method­i­cal­ly ques­tions Alli­son Man­ning about her rela­tion­ship with her late hus­band, Paul, dur­ing her court­room tes­ti­mo­ny. Alli­son recounts their meet­ing five years pri­or, their courtship, and even­tu­al mar­riage, paint­ing a pic­ture of a lov­ing part­ner­ship. She describes their mod­est begin­nings in a small Green­wich Vil­lage apart­ment and how Paul’s suc­cess as a nov­el­ist improved their lifestyle, allow­ing them to pur­chase a lux­u­ri­ous home and a cus­tom-built yacht. The yacht, designed for sin­gle-hand­ed sail­ing, became cen­tral to their lives, and Alli­son empha­sizes their hap­pi­ness and close­ness dur­ing their trav­els.

    Alli­son details their Atlantic voy­age, high­light­ing the strength of their mar­riage despite the chal­lenges of liv­ing in close quar­ters at sea. She emo­tion­al­ly recounts the trag­ic inci­dent where Paul col­lapsed and died, leav­ing her to nav­i­gate the yacht alone. Her tear­ful tes­ti­mo­ny describes her strug­gle to learn sail­ing and celes­tial nav­i­ga­tion, ulti­mate­ly land­ing in St. Marks instead of Antigua. The jury appears moved by her account, and Stone skill­ful­ly guides her through the nar­ra­tive, rein­forc­ing her cred­i­bil­i­ty as she swears to the truth of her state­ments.

    The tone shifts dra­mat­i­cal­ly when Sir Win­ston, the oppos­ing coun­sel, begins his cross-exam­i­na­tion. He aggres­sive­ly accus­es Alli­son of mur­der­ing Paul for finan­cial gain, ref­er­enc­ing his earn­ings and a $12 mil­lion insur­ance pol­i­cy. Alli­son, vis­i­bly angered, vehe­ment­ly denies the alle­ga­tions, shout­ing her inno­cence. Sir Winston’s line of ques­tion­ing sug­gests a cal­cu­lat­ed attempt to under­mine her cred­i­bil­i­ty, imply­ing she grew to resent Paul dur­ing their pro­longed time at sea. The ten­sion esca­lates as Alli­son strug­gles to main­tain com­po­sure under his accusato­ry tone.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with a stark con­trast between Allison’s heart­felt tes­ti­mo­ny and Sir Winston’s hos­tile inter­ro­ga­tion. Stone’s care­ful prepa­ra­tion of Alli­son appears suc­cess­ful, as her emo­tion­al recount­ing of Paul’s death res­onates with the jury. How­ev­er, Sir Winston’s abrupt accu­sa­tions intro­duce doubt, set­ting the stage for a con­tentious legal bat­tle. The chap­ter effec­tive­ly builds sus­pense, leav­ing the read­er ques­tion­ing the true nature of Paul’s death and Allison’s role in it.

    FAQs

    • 1. How did Allison and Paul Manning first meet, and what was Paul’s occupation at the time?

      Answer:
      Allison and Paul Manning first met at a dinner party hosted by Allison’s boss at an advertising agency in New York, where she worked as an art director. Paul was another guest at the dinner. At the time, Paul was a writer who had transitioned from a newspaper career to writing novels. He was working on his third novel when they met but had not yet achieved significant financial success, earning only a modest income from his writing.

      2. What were the key changes in the Mannings’ lifestyle after Paul’s third novel became a bestseller?

      Answer:
      After Paul’s third novel became a bestseller, their financial situation improved dramatically. They moved from a modest, cramped apartment in Greenwich Village to a large, comfortable house in Greenwich, Connecticut. They began driving expensive cars, dining out frequently, and hosting dinner parties. Additionally, Paul ordered a custom-built yacht from Finland, designed to be sailed singlehandedly. This marked a significant shift from their earlier, more frugal lifestyle.

      3. How did Allison describe the state of her marriage during their transatlantic voyage, and what incident tested her sailing skills?

      Answer:
      Allison described her marriage during the voyage as stronger than ever, emphasizing their closeness and mutual gratitude. However, the journey tested her when she had to retrieve a broken part from the top of the mast—a task that left her stranded when Paul suddenly collapsed below. This incident forced her to quickly learn how to sail and navigate the yacht alone, relying on a celestial navigation book to guide her to land, albeit not their intended destination.

      4. What was the tone of Sir Winston’s cross-examination, and how did Allison react to his accusations?

      Answer:
      Sir Winston’s cross-examination was aggressive and accusatory, implying that Allison murdered her husband for financial gain or due to resentment from their time at sea. He interrupted her repeatedly, referencing Paul’s wealth and life insurance policy. Allison grew visibly angry, shouting in denial, which contradicted Stone’s advice to remain composed. Her emotional outburst, however, contrasted with her earlier composed testimony, potentially affecting the jury’s perception.

      5. Why might Allison’s emotional display during her testimony have been strategically significant for her defense?

      Answer:
      Allison’s tears and emotional recounting of Paul’s death humanized her and likely elicited sympathy from the jury. Unlike her composed demeanor at the coroner’s inquest, her raw emotion during the trial made her grief appear genuine, reinforcing her innocence. Stone likely recognized that this display would counter Sir Winston’s narrative of her as a cold, calculating murderer, making her testimony more persuasive to the jury.

    Quotes

    • 1. “When you spend a lot of time with a person on a boat, you really get to know him.”

      This quote captures Allison’s testimony about how her marriage strengthened during their transatlantic voyage, contrasting with common assumptions that close quarters strain relationships. It’s significant as it establishes their seemingly happy marriage before the tragedy.

      2. “I began to think of the boat as my partner in survival.”

      A powerful metaphor showing Allison’s psychological adaptation after her husband’s death at sea. This quote illustrates her isolation and resourcefulness during the ordeal, making it a pivotal moment in her testimony.

      3. “As God is my witness it is the truth.”

      Allison’s emphatic declaration of honesty during cross-examination represents the chapter’s central conflict - her credibility versus the prosecution’s accusations. The religious invocation adds weight to her denial of murder allegations.

      4. “Sir Winston! I did not kill my husband!”

      This emotional outburst marks the chapter’s dramatic climax, showing Allison’s breaking point under aggressive questioning. The raw denial encapsulates the trial’s high stakes and her desperate defense against the murder charge.

    Quotes

    1. “When you spend a lot of time with a person on a boat, you really get to know him.”

    This quote captures Allison’s testimony about how her marriage strengthened during their transatlantic voyage, contrasting with common assumptions that close quarters strain relationships. It’s significant as it establishes their seemingly happy marriage before the tragedy.

    2. “I began to think of the boat as my partner in survival.”

    A powerful metaphor showing Allison’s psychological adaptation after her husband’s death at sea. This quote illustrates her isolation and resourcefulness during the ordeal, making it a pivotal moment in her testimony.

    3. “As God is my witness it is the truth.”

    Allison’s emphatic declaration of honesty during cross-examination represents the chapter’s central conflict - her credibility versus the prosecution’s accusations. The religious invocation adds weight to her denial of murder allegations.

    4. “Sir Winston! I did not kill my husband!”

    This emotional outburst marks the chapter’s dramatic climax, showing Allison’s breaking point under aggressive questioning. The raw denial encapsulates the trial’s high stakes and her desperate defense against the murder charge.

    FAQs

    1. How did Allison and Paul Manning first meet, and what was Paul’s occupation at the time?

    Answer:
    Allison and Paul Manning first met at a dinner party hosted by Allison’s boss at an advertising agency in New York, where she worked as an art director. Paul was another guest at the dinner. At the time, Paul was a writer who had transitioned from a newspaper career to writing novels. He was working on his third novel when they met but had not yet achieved significant financial success, earning only a modest income from his writing.

    2. What were the key changes in the Mannings’ lifestyle after Paul’s third novel became a bestseller?

    Answer:
    After Paul’s third novel became a bestseller, their financial situation improved dramatically. They moved from a modest, cramped apartment in Greenwich Village to a large, comfortable house in Greenwich, Connecticut. They began driving expensive cars, dining out frequently, and hosting dinner parties. Additionally, Paul ordered a custom-built yacht from Finland, designed to be sailed singlehandedly. This marked a significant shift from their earlier, more frugal lifestyle.

    3. How did Allison describe the state of her marriage during their transatlantic voyage, and what incident tested her sailing skills?

    Answer:
    Allison described her marriage during the voyage as stronger than ever, emphasizing their closeness and mutual gratitude. However, the journey tested her when she had to retrieve a broken part from the top of the mast—a task that left her stranded when Paul suddenly collapsed below. This incident forced her to quickly learn how to sail and navigate the yacht alone, relying on a celestial navigation book to guide her to land, albeit not their intended destination.

    4. What was the tone of Sir Winston’s cross-examination, and how did Allison react to his accusations?

    Answer:
    Sir Winston’s cross-examination was aggressive and accusatory, implying that Allison murdered her husband for financial gain or due to resentment from their time at sea. He interrupted her repeatedly, referencing Paul’s wealth and life insurance policy. Allison grew visibly angry, shouting in denial, which contradicted Stone’s advice to remain composed. Her emotional outburst, however, contrasted with her earlier composed testimony, potentially affecting the jury’s perception.

    5. Why might Allison’s emotional display during her testimony have been strategically significant for her defense?

    Answer:
    Allison’s tears and emotional recounting of Paul’s death humanized her and likely elicited sympathy from the jury. Unlike her composed demeanor at the coroner’s inquest, her raw emotion during the trial made her grief appear genuine, reinforcing her innocence. Stone likely recognized that this display would counter Sir Winston’s narrative of her as a cold, calculating murderer, making her testimony more persuasive to the jury.

    Note