Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    Stone Bar­ring­ton, pre­oc­cu­pied with thoughts of con­tact­ing Arring­ton, real­izes he can­not reach her as she is stay­ing at Vance Calder’s Palm Springs house. As he approach­es the Shipwright’s Arms, he notices a large man in a seer­suck­er suit at the bar, who bears a strik­ing resem­blance to Paul Man­ning, a key fig­ure in Allison’s case. Stone ini­tial­ly won­ders if Manning’s pre­sumed death was a mis­take, but the man intro­duces him­self as Frank Sten­dahl, a New Eng­lan­der on vaca­tion. Stendahl’s curios­i­ty about the upcom­ing tri­al and Allison’s inno­cence rais­es Stone’s sus­pi­cions, though he remains out­ward­ly polite.

    Stendahl’s behav­ior becomes increas­ing­ly pecu­liar as he probes Stone and the bar­tender, Thomas, for details about the tri­al and Alli­son. Despite his claims of being a tourist, his aggres­sive ques­tion­ing and lack of sub­tle­ty make Thomas doubt his authen­tic­i­ty. Stone, too, finds Stendahl’s inter­est unusu­al, espe­cial­ly giv­en the trial’s high-pro­file nature. The man’s expen­sive Hart­mann lug­gage and soli­tary pres­ence fur­ther com­pli­cate his sto­ry, as nei­ther aligns with typ­i­cal tourist or law enforce­ment behav­ior. Stone and Thomas exchange wary obser­va­tions, but nei­ther can pin­point Stendahl’s true motives.

    After chang­ing into casu­al attire, Sten­dahl attempts to explore the mari­na but is stopped by police guards. He redi­rects his walk toward the harbor’s edge, dis­ap­pear­ing from view. Stone, unset­tled by the encounter, asks Thomas to gath­er more infor­ma­tion if Sten­dahl returns. Though Stone dis­miss­es him as a poten­tial­ly harm­less tri­al enthu­si­ast, Thomas remains skep­ti­cal, not­ing Stendahl’s per­sis­tent prob­ing and unusu­al demeanor. The chap­ter ends with Stone retreat­ing to his room, down­play­ing the threat but leav­ing the read­er with lin­ger­ing ques­tions about Stendahl’s inten­tions.

    The chap­ter effec­tive­ly builds ten­sion through Stendahl’s enig­mat­ic pres­ence and the unre­solved mys­tery sur­round­ing his iden­ti­ty. Stone’s inter­nal conflict—balancing cau­tion with skepticism—mirrors the broad­er uncer­tain­ty of Allison’s case. The dia­logue and descrip­tions cre­ate a sense of unease, hint­ing at deep­er lay­ers to the sto­ry. While Stone tries to ratio­nal­ize Stendahl’s behav­ior, the chap­ter leaves room for doubt, set­ting the stage for poten­tial rev­e­la­tions in sub­se­quent chap­ters.

    FAQs

    • 1. What initial assumption does Stone make about the man in the seersucker suit, and what causes him to reconsider this assumption?

      Answer:
      Stone initially assumes the man might be Paul Manning, Allison’s supposedly deceased husband, due to his physical resemblance to Manning’s photograph (minus the beard). This thought arises from a fleeting hope that Manning might still be alive, which would exonerate Allison. However, Stone quickly reconsiders when the man introduces himself as Frank Stendahl and engages in conversation, revealing details about his background and behavior that don’t align with Manning’s profile. Thomas’s observations about Stendahl’s lack of subtlety further dispel the idea that he could be Manning or a cop.

      2. Analyze the significance of Stendahl’s behavior and Thomas’s observations. What might they suggest about his true intentions?

      Answer:
      Stendahl’s behavior—such as aggressively pumping Thomas for information about Allison and the trial, his unusual interest in attending the proceedings, and his abrupt questioning of Stone—suggests he has an ulterior motive beyond being a tourist. Thomas notes that Stendahl lacks the subtlety of a cop but also doesn’t fit the profile of a typical vacationer. His expensive Hartmann luggage hints at wealth, possibly indicating he’s a private investigator, journalist, or someone with a personal stake in the case. His persistence and agenda-driven actions create an air of suspicion, though his exact role remains unclear.

      3. How does the setting of St. Marks and its recent events contribute to the tension surrounding Stendahl’s appearance?

      Answer:
      The setting amplifies tension because St. Marks is isolated and recently inundated with press due to Allison’s high-profile case. The absence of other tourists (attributed to a blizzard and negative publicity) makes Stendahl’s presence stand out. Stone’s wariness stems from his experiences with intrusive journalists, and the island’s small, guarded marina (with police officers) adds to the atmosphere of surveillance. Stendahl’s decision to visit despite the island’s unpopularity and his focus on the trial further mark him as an outlier, heightening Stone’s unease.

      4. Why does Stone ultimately dismiss Stendahl as a threat, and is this a reasonable conclusion based on the chapter?

      Answer:
      Stone dismisses Stendahl because he lacks concrete evidence of malicious intent and views him as akin to a trial spectator, like those at the O.J. Simpson case. Compared to the aggressive press he’s faced, Stendahl seems less threatening. However, this conclusion may be premature: Thomas’s suspicions, Stendahl’s probing questions, and his unusual behavior (e.g., circumventing the marina guards) suggest he’s more than a curious bystander. Stone’s dismissal reflects his exhaustion from prior conflicts, but the text leaves room for doubt about Stendahl’s true motives.

      5. How does the author use dialogue and descriptive details to characterize Frank Stendahl? Provide examples.

      Answer:
      The author crafts Stendahl’s character through blunt dialogue (e.g., “You must be Stone Barrington”) and persistent questioning (“what’s your trial strategy?”), portraying him as forward and agenda-driven. Physical descriptions—his seersucker suit, “pasty white arms,” and lumbering gait—paint him as an outsider unaccustomed to the tropics. His actions, like changing his walking route to avoid the marina guards, hint at stealth. Thomas’s observations (“he just charged straight ahead”) reinforce his lack of subtlety. These details collectively build an image of a man who is both conspicuous and enigmatic, raising questions about his role in the story.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Stone suddenly had the strange feeling that the whole business was some sort of dreadful error, that Paul Manning had simply fallen overboard near the Canaries and had swum ashore, and now he had shown up in St. Marks to save Allison’s life.”

      This quote captures Stone’s momentary doubt and paranoia as he encounters a stranger who resembles Paul Manning. It reveals his underlying anxiety about the case and the possibility of a miraculous twist that could upend everything.

      2. “‘A cop would have done it differently,’ Thomas said. ‘More subtly. This guy just charged straight ahead.’”

      This exchange highlights the suspicious nature of Frank Stendahl’s behavior. Thomas’s professional assessment suggests Stendahl might be hiding something, though his methods don’t align with typical law enforcement tactics, adding intrigue to his character.

      3. “‘I think he’s got an agenda, but I’m damned if I know what it is. Besides, what would an American cop be doing down here?’”

      Thomas’s observation underscores the mystery surrounding Stendahl’s true motives. This quote raises questions about Stendahl’s purpose in St. Marks and whether he poses a threat, contributing to the chapter’s tension.

      4. “‘Right now, all I think is that he’s a tourist, like he says; maybe the sort of guy who turned up at the O. J. Simpson trial. I can’t think of any other reason for him to be here, can you?’”

      Stone’s comparison of Stendahl to a trial spectator reflects his attempt to rationalize the stranger’s presence. This quote shows Stone’s cautious but dismissive attitude, hinting at potential underestimation of Stendahl’s role in the unfolding events.

    Quotes

    1. “Stone suddenly had the strange feeling that the whole business was some sort of dreadful error, that Paul Manning had simply fallen overboard near the Canaries and had swum ashore, and now he had shown up in St. Marks to save Allison’s life.”

    This quote captures Stone’s momentary doubt and paranoia as he encounters a stranger who resembles Paul Manning. It reveals his underlying anxiety about the case and the possibility of a miraculous twist that could upend everything.

    2. “‘A cop would have done it differently,’ Thomas said. ‘More subtly. This guy just charged straight ahead.’”

    This exchange highlights the suspicious nature of Frank Stendahl’s behavior. Thomas’s professional assessment suggests Stendahl might be hiding something, though his methods don’t align with typical law enforcement tactics, adding intrigue to his character.

    3. “‘I think he’s got an agenda, but I’m damned if I know what it is. Besides, what would an American cop be doing down here?’”

    Thomas’s observation underscores the mystery surrounding Stendahl’s true motives. This quote raises questions about Stendahl’s purpose in St. Marks and whether he poses a threat, contributing to the chapter’s tension.

    4. “‘Right now, all I think is that he’s a tourist, like he says; maybe the sort of guy who turned up at the O. J. Simpson trial. I can’t think of any other reason for him to be here, can you?’”

    Stone’s comparison of Stendahl to a trial spectator reflects his attempt to rationalize the stranger’s presence. This quote shows Stone’s cautious but dismissive attitude, hinting at potential underestimation of Stendahl’s role in the unfolding events.

    FAQs

    1. What initial assumption does Stone make about the man in the seersucker suit, and what causes him to reconsider this assumption?

    Answer:
    Stone initially assumes the man might be Paul Manning, Allison’s supposedly deceased husband, due to his physical resemblance to Manning’s photograph (minus the beard). This thought arises from a fleeting hope that Manning might still be alive, which would exonerate Allison. However, Stone quickly reconsiders when the man introduces himself as Frank Stendahl and engages in conversation, revealing details about his background and behavior that don’t align with Manning’s profile. Thomas’s observations about Stendahl’s lack of subtlety further dispel the idea that he could be Manning or a cop.

    2. Analyze the significance of Stendahl’s behavior and Thomas’s observations. What might they suggest about his true intentions?

    Answer:
    Stendahl’s behavior—such as aggressively pumping Thomas for information about Allison and the trial, his unusual interest in attending the proceedings, and his abrupt questioning of Stone—suggests he has an ulterior motive beyond being a tourist. Thomas notes that Stendahl lacks the subtlety of a cop but also doesn’t fit the profile of a typical vacationer. His expensive Hartmann luggage hints at wealth, possibly indicating he’s a private investigator, journalist, or someone with a personal stake in the case. His persistence and agenda-driven actions create an air of suspicion, though his exact role remains unclear.

    3. How does the setting of St. Marks and its recent events contribute to the tension surrounding Stendahl’s appearance?

    Answer:
    The setting amplifies tension because St. Marks is isolated and recently inundated with press due to Allison’s high-profile case. The absence of other tourists (attributed to a blizzard and negative publicity) makes Stendahl’s presence stand out. Stone’s wariness stems from his experiences with intrusive journalists, and the island’s small, guarded marina (with police officers) adds to the atmosphere of surveillance. Stendahl’s decision to visit despite the island’s unpopularity and his focus on the trial further mark him as an outlier, heightening Stone’s unease.

    4. Why does Stone ultimately dismiss Stendahl as a threat, and is this a reasonable conclusion based on the chapter?

    Answer:
    Stone dismisses Stendahl because he lacks concrete evidence of malicious intent and views him as akin to a trial spectator, like those at the O.J. Simpson case. Compared to the aggressive press he’s faced, Stendahl seems less threatening. However, this conclusion may be premature: Thomas’s suspicions, Stendahl’s probing questions, and his unusual behavior (e.g., circumventing the marina guards) suggest he’s more than a curious bystander. Stone’s dismissal reflects his exhaustion from prior conflicts, but the text leaves room for doubt about Stendahl’s true motives.

    5. How does the author use dialogue and descriptive details to characterize Frank Stendahl? Provide examples.

    Answer:
    The author crafts Stendahl’s character through blunt dialogue (e.g., “You must be Stone Barrington”) and persistent questioning (“what’s your trial strategy?”), portraying him as forward and agenda-driven. Physical descriptions—his seersucker suit, “pasty white arms,” and lumbering gait—paint him as an outsider unaccustomed to the tropics. His actions, like changing his walking route to avoid the marina guards, hint at stealth. Thomas’s observations (“he just charged straight ahead”) reinforce his lack of subtlety. These details collectively build an image of a man who is both conspicuous and enigmatic, raising questions about his role in the story.

    Note