Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    In Chap­ter 39, Stone Bar­ring­ton con­fronts Alli­son Man­ning about her plan to flee St. Marks on a fast yacht to avoid her impend­ing tri­al and pos­si­ble exe­cu­tion for her husband’s mur­der. Stone warns her that escap­ing would make her appear guilty, jeop­ar­dize her pub­lic sup­port, and result in a life as a fugi­tive. Alli­son, how­ev­er, believes the tri­al is rigged against her and insists she has no oth­er choice. She argues that the yacht’s speed and inter­na­tion­al waters will ensure her safe­ty, but Stone coun­ters that extra­di­tion and legal bat­tles would drain her resources and free­dom.

    Allison’s des­per­a­tion is evi­dent as she tear­ful­ly defends her deci­sion, stat­ing that liv­ing as a fugi­tive is prefer­able to dying on the island. Stone, an offi­cer of the court, refus­es to aid her escape, empha­siz­ing his eth­i­cal oblig­a­tions. When Alli­son pleads with him to stay, he rejects her, fear­ing her actions endan­ger them both. Their tense exchange high­lights Allison’s fear and Stone’s frus­tra­tion, as he real­izes he can­not dis­suade her from her reck­less plan.

    The sit­u­a­tion esca­lates when Stone spots police approach­ing the mari­na, forc­ing him to quick­ly hide Allison’s lug­gage and impro­vise a cov­er sto­ry. Alli­son plays along, offer­ing drinks to the offi­cers while Stone attempts to deflect sus­pi­cion. Colonel Buck­ler, the lead offi­cer, ques­tions them about the char­tered yacht, but Stone and Alli­son deny any involve­ment, insist­ing the yacht is for anoth­er pas­sen­ger. The colonel remains skep­ti­cal, plac­ing Alli­son under restrict­ed move­ment but lack­ing con­crete evi­dence.

    The chap­ter ends with a stand­off, as Alli­son defi­ant­ly claims she looks for­ward to her tri­al and acquit­tal. The encounter under­scores the high stakes of her sit­u­a­tion and the mount­ing pres­sure from author­i­ties. Stone’s efforts to pro­tect Alli­son clash with her deter­mi­na­tion to escape, leav­ing both char­ac­ters in a pre­car­i­ous posi­tion as the police close in. The ten­sion sets the stage for fur­ther con­fronta­tion in the unfold­ing legal and per­son­al dra­ma.

    FAQs

    • 1. What are Stone’s main arguments against Allison’s plan to escape, and how does Allison counter these arguments?

      Answer:
      Stone presents several arguments against Allison’s escape plan: (1) She would be judged guilty without trial and hanged if caught, (2) Running would make her appear guilty and lose public support, (3) Extradition battles would drain her finances and restrict her freedom indefinitely, and (4) Living as a fugitive would be unbearable. Allison counters that she’s already doomed in St. Marks’ biased legal system, believes her fast yacht can evade capture, and argues that fighting extradition in U.S. courts is preferable to execution. She also dismisses public opinion as fleeting (“flavor of the week”) and accepts the risks of a hidden life as better than death.

      Answer:
      The chapter reveals tension between St. Marks’ insular legal authority and growing international scrutiny. Stone highlights how U.S. political pressure (senators’ involvement) and global media attention (“world famous” coverage) could force the prime minister to intervene, suggesting external influence might override local corruption. However, Allison argues St. Marks historically operates with impunity (“nobody has ever cared”), and the 48-hour execution window leaves little time for effective intervention. This clash shows Sutherland’s local power may be challenged but not yet overcome by international norms, creating high-stakes uncertainty about which system will ultimately prevail.

      3. Analyze the significance of the policemen’s arrival in the final scene. How does it change the characters’ strategies?

      Answer:
      The policemen’s arrival forces immediate tactical shifts: (1) Stone abandons his moral argument to help hide evidence (tossing duffels), showing his protective instincts override professional ethics; (2) Allison must instantly play innocent despite her earlier resolve, serving drinks and feigning confusion; (3) Their improvised “casual drink” charade demonstrates quick collaborative deception under pressure. The scene heightens tension by confirming Stone’s fears of surveillance while testing their ability to think on their feet. The colonel’s specific knowledge about the yacht charter suggests authorities are monitoring them closely, making escape even riskier than initially presumed.

      4. What does the exchange reveal about Stone’s professional and personal conflicts in this situation?

      Answer:
      Stone faces multiple conflicts: (1) As a lawyer, he’s obligated to prevent crime (aiding escape) but can’t bring himself to turn Allison in (“instrument of your death”); (2) His fury at her “stupidity” clashes with compassion when seeing her fear (“tears welled up”); (3) He refuses to flee with her due to ethical boundaries (“not going to become a party to a crime”) yet risks complicity by hiding her luggage. These contradictions show him torn between duty, self-preservation, and emotional connection. His final warning (“we won’t be seeing each other again”) suggests he’s drawing a professional line, but the police arrival immediately forces him back into protective action.

    Quotes

    • 1. “They’re going to hang me anyway… Can’t you see the way this is headed? They’ve stacked the deck against me in every possible way.”

      This quote captures Allison’s despair and her perception of the hopelessness of her legal situation. It reveals the central conflict of the chapter - her belief that the justice system is rigged against her, which motivates her desperate plan to flee.

      2. “If they try to hang an American citizen under these circumstances, the world will fall on them. The pressure on the prime minister will be unbearable; he’ll have to cave in.”

      Stone presents his counterargument about using international pressure rather than fleeing. This quote shows the political dimensions of the case and Stone’s strategy of leveraging Allison’s American citizenship and media attention.

      3. “I’m not going to get caught. That boat over there is the fastest thing afloat between here and Miami… They don’t have anything that can stop us.”

      This quote demonstrates Allison’s determination to escape and her confidence in her plan. It marks a key turning point where she fully commits to the risky escape attempt despite Stone’s warnings.

      4. “I’m not going to become a party to a crime for you or anybody else, and I’m certainly not going to become a fugitive.”

      Stone’s firm declaration establishes his ethical boundaries and professional limits. This moment shows the fundamental conflict between his legal principles and Allison’s survival instincts.

      5. “You see, Colonel, I am quite looking forward to my trial and acquittal.”

      Allison’s ironic statement to the police colonel shows her quick thinking under pressure. This quote reveals her ability to mask her true intentions and the tense cat-and-mouse game developing with the authorities.

    Quotes

    1. “They’re going to hang me anyway… Can’t you see the way this is headed? They’ve stacked the deck against me in every possible way.”

    This quote captures Allison’s despair and her perception of the hopelessness of her legal situation. It reveals the central conflict of the chapter - her belief that the justice system is rigged against her, which motivates her desperate plan to flee.

    2. “If they try to hang an American citizen under these circumstances, the world will fall on them. The pressure on the prime minister will be unbearable; he’ll have to cave in.”

    Stone presents his counterargument about using international pressure rather than fleeing. This quote shows the political dimensions of the case and Stone’s strategy of leveraging Allison’s American citizenship and media attention.

    3. “I’m not going to get caught. That boat over there is the fastest thing afloat between here and Miami… They don’t have anything that can stop us.”

    This quote demonstrates Allison’s determination to escape and her confidence in her plan. It marks a key turning point where she fully commits to the risky escape attempt despite Stone’s warnings.

    4. “I’m not going to become a party to a crime for you or anybody else, and I’m certainly not going to become a fugitive.”

    Stone’s firm declaration establishes his ethical boundaries and professional limits. This moment shows the fundamental conflict between his legal principles and Allison’s survival instincts.

    5. “You see, Colonel, I am quite looking forward to my trial and acquittal.”

    Allison’s ironic statement to the police colonel shows her quick thinking under pressure. This quote reveals her ability to mask her true intentions and the tense cat-and-mouse game developing with the authorities.

    FAQs

    1. What are Stone’s main arguments against Allison’s plan to escape, and how does Allison counter these arguments?

    Answer:
    Stone presents several arguments against Allison’s escape plan: (1) She would be judged guilty without trial and hanged if caught, (2) Running would make her appear guilty and lose public support, (3) Extradition battles would drain her finances and restrict her freedom indefinitely, and (4) Living as a fugitive would be unbearable. Allison counters that she’s already doomed in St. Marks’ biased legal system, believes her fast yacht can evade capture, and argues that fighting extradition in U.S. courts is preferable to execution. She also dismisses public opinion as fleeting (“flavor of the week”) and accepts the risks of a hidden life as better than death.

    Answer:
    The chapter reveals tension between St. Marks’ insular legal authority and growing international scrutiny. Stone highlights how U.S. political pressure (senators’ involvement) and global media attention (“world famous” coverage) could force the prime minister to intervene, suggesting external influence might override local corruption. However, Allison argues St. Marks historically operates with impunity (“nobody has ever cared”), and the 48-hour execution window leaves little time for effective intervention. This clash shows Sutherland’s local power may be challenged but not yet overcome by international norms, creating high-stakes uncertainty about which system will ultimately prevail.

    3. Analyze the significance of the policemen’s arrival in the final scene. How does it change the characters’ strategies?

    Answer:
    The policemen’s arrival forces immediate tactical shifts: (1) Stone abandons his moral argument to help hide evidence (tossing duffels), showing his protective instincts override professional ethics; (2) Allison must instantly play innocent despite her earlier resolve, serving drinks and feigning confusion; (3) Their improvised “casual drink” charade demonstrates quick collaborative deception under pressure. The scene heightens tension by confirming Stone’s fears of surveillance while testing their ability to think on their feet. The colonel’s specific knowledge about the yacht charter suggests authorities are monitoring them closely, making escape even riskier than initially presumed.

    4. What does the exchange reveal about Stone’s professional and personal conflicts in this situation?

    Answer:
    Stone faces multiple conflicts: (1) As a lawyer, he’s obligated to prevent crime (aiding escape) but can’t bring himself to turn Allison in (“instrument of your death”); (2) His fury at her “stupidity” clashes with compassion when seeing her fear (“tears welled up”); (3) He refuses to flee with her due to ethical boundaries (“not going to become a party to a crime”) yet risks complicity by hiding her luggage. These contradictions show him torn between duty, self-preservation, and emotional connection. His final warning (“we won’t be seeing each other again”) suggests he’s drawing a professional line, but the police arrival immediately forces him back into protective action.

    Note