Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.
    PreviousNext
    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    Chapter 33

    by Stuart, Woods,

    In Chap­ter 33, Stone Bar­ring­ton finds him­self in a tense con­fronta­tion with Sir Win­ston, who ques­tions him about his inter­ac­tions with Eliz­a­beth Man­ning, the ex-wife of the deceased Paul Man­ning. Stone admits to their con­nec­tion but avoids reveal­ing too much, cit­ing attor­ney-client con­fi­den­tial­i­ty. Sir Win­ston probes fur­ther, sus­pect­ing Stone’s involve­ment in finan­cial mat­ters relat­ed to Manning’s estate. Stone deflects by empha­siz­ing Elizabeth’s lack of inher­i­tance and the sec­ond Mrs. Manning’s char­i­ta­ble ges­ture. The exchange high­lights Sir Winston’s attempts to exploit Elizabeth’s pres­ence for legal advan­tage, while Stone care­ful­ly nav­i­gates the con­ver­sa­tion to pro­tect his client’s inter­ests.

    The dia­logue esca­lates as Sir Win­ston press­es Stone about the doc­u­ments exchanged with Eliz­a­beth Man­ning dur­ing their din­ner. Stone main­tains his pro­fes­sion­al dis­cre­tion, only acknowl­edg­ing the sec­ond Mrs. Manning’s kind­ness toward her pre­de­ces­sor. Sir Winston’s skep­ti­cism is evi­dent, but Stone remains com­posed, using legal bound­aries to avoid fur­ther dis­clo­sure. The ten­sion is momen­tar­i­ly dif­fused as they turn to their meals, but the under­ly­ing pow­er strug­gle per­sists. Stone sens­es Sir Winston’s frus­tra­tion, rec­og­niz­ing his failed attempt to extract com­pro­mis­ing infor­ma­tion about Eliz­a­beth Manning’s role in the case.

    Sir Win­ston shifts focus to Eliz­a­beth Manning’s back­ground, ques­tion­ing her res­i­dence in Palm Beach despite her alleged lack of wealth. Stone down­plays the dis­crep­an­cy, sug­gest­ing she lived mod­est­ly while work­ing for a local news­pa­per. He offers prac­ti­cal sug­ges­tions for locat­ing her next of kin, but Sir Win­ston dis­miss­es them, reveal­ing his ulte­ri­or motives. The con­ver­sa­tion takes a per­son­al turn as Sir Win­ston insin­u­ates that Stone’s rela­tion­ship with the sec­ond Mrs. Man­ning extends beyond legal coun­sel. Stone feigns igno­rance, forc­ing Sir Win­ston to blunt­ly accuse him of an affair, which Stone vehe­ment­ly denies.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates in a heat­ed exchange, with Stone accus­ing Sir Win­ston of over­step­ping his pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al bounds and focus­ing on irrel­e­vant per­son­al mat­ters. Stone storms out, refus­ing to enter­tain fur­ther accu­sa­tions, while Sir Win­ston threat­ens ret­ri­bu­tion. The con­fronta­tion leaves Stone wary of poten­tial reper­cus­sions, but he man­ages to escape with­out imme­di­ate con­se­quences. The chap­ter under­scores the high-stakes legal and per­son­al ten­sions between the two men, set­ting the stage for fur­ther con­flict in the tri­al ahead.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • Answer:
      Elizabeth Manning was the first wife of Paul Manning, Stone’s client’s late husband. Stone reveals she came to the island out of curiosity about Paul’s death and potential interest in his estate. Their exchange of documents at dinner suggests legal discussions about her financial claims. This complicates Stone’s position because Sir Winston suspects Stone may be improperly involved in financial arrangements between the two Manning women, potentially breaching attorney-client confidentiality or engaging in unethical conduct by facilitating payments between them.

      2. How does Stone employ Mark Twain’s advice in his interaction with Sir Winston, and what does this reveal about his strategy?

      Answer:
      Stone follows Mark Twain’s advice to “tell the truth” when in doubt, admitting Elizabeth Manning’s identity and her connection to Paul Manning. This strategy demonstrates Stone’s calculated honesty—he shares enough factual information to appear cooperative while withholding sensitive details protected by attorney-client privilege. His selective truth-telling helps maintain credibility while avoiding self-incrimination or compromising his client’s interests, showing his legal acumen in navigating hostile questioning.

      3. Analyze the significance of Sir Winston’s questioning about Stone’s “services” to the second Mrs. Manning. What is he implying, and how does Stone respond?

      Answer:
      Sir Winston insinuates that Stone’s relationship with Mrs. Manning extends beyond legal representation, hinting at a romantic or sexual involvement (“you are fucking the lady”). This implication aims to undermine Stone’s professionalism and potentially discredit him. Stone deflects by questioning the propriety of such conjecture from a prosecutor, then pivots to attacking the prosecution’s merits. His indignant exit serves as both a tactical retreat and a statement of moral high ground.

      4. What does the chapter reveal about power dynamics between Stone and Sir Winston through their dialogue and body language?

      Answer:
      The power dynamic shifts throughout their confrontation. Initially, Sir Winston dominates with pointed questions and subtle threats (noting Stone’s “odd hours” on the yacht). Stone maintains composure but grows defensive when cornered about his personal conduct. The climax—Stone’s dramatic exit—reverses the dynamic, asserting his autonomy. Physical cues like Sir Winston’s “considerable full height” and Stone’s purposeful departure underscore their clash of authority, with neither fully yielding ground.

      5. How does the setting (lunch with lobster salad and champagne) contrast with the underlying tension of the conversation?

      Answer:
      The elegant luncheon setting—lobster salad, champagne, and petit fours—creates an ironic contrast with the escalating confrontation. The refined atmosphere initially masks the hostility, allowing both men to maintain decorum while probing sensitive topics. However, the shared meal becomes a battleground, with pauses for eating serving as tactical respites (Stone “grateful for the opportunity to collect his thoughts”). The juxtaposition highlights the duality of their interaction: superficially civil, fundamentally adversarial.

    Quotes

    • 1. “He decided to follow Mark Twain’s advice: when in doubt, tell the truth.”

      This quote captures Stone’s internal conflict and decision-making process as he faces Sir Winston’s interrogation. It introduces the theme of truth versus deception that runs through the chapter.

      2. “I am sure you understand that I am bound by the confidentiality strictures of the attorney-client relationship…”

      This statement represents Stone’s professional stance and the legal boundaries he maintains, even under pressure. It shows the tension between legal ethics and Sir Winston’s probing questions.

      3. “Sir, neither my sex life nor hers is your proper concern. Rather, you should be concerned with this extremely strange prosecution of an innocent and bereaved woman for a crime which she could never have committed.”

      This powerful retort marks the climax of the confrontation, where Stone shifts from defense to offense. It encapsulates both the personal accusation and the larger injustice of the case.

      4. “When this trial is over—and maybe even before—you are going to come to a reckoning with me!”

      Sir Winston’s threatening parting words create tension and foreshadow future conflict. This quote represents the breakdown of professional decorum and the personal vendetta that has developed.

      5. “Stone kept his eyes straight ahead, down the hall and the stairs into the street, expecting to be arrested at any moment.”

      This closing line effectively conveys the danger and tension of the situation. It leaves the reader wondering about potential consequences and sets up suspense for future chapters.

    Quotes

    1. “He decided to follow Mark Twain’s advice: when in doubt, tell the truth.”

    This quote captures Stone’s internal conflict and decision-making process as he faces Sir Winston’s interrogation. It introduces the theme of truth versus deception that runs through the chapter.

    2. “I am sure you understand that I am bound by the confidentiality strictures of the attorney-client relationship…”

    This statement represents Stone’s professional stance and the legal boundaries he maintains, even under pressure. It shows the tension between legal ethics and Sir Winston’s probing questions.

    3. “Sir, neither my sex life nor hers is your proper concern. Rather, you should be concerned with this extremely strange prosecution of an innocent and bereaved woman for a crime which she could never have committed.”

    This powerful retort marks the climax of the confrontation, where Stone shifts from defense to offense. It encapsulates both the personal accusation and the larger injustice of the case.

    4. “When this trial is over—and maybe even before—you are going to come to a reckoning with me!”

    Sir Winston’s threatening parting words create tension and foreshadow future conflict. This quote represents the breakdown of professional decorum and the personal vendetta that has developed.

    5. “Stone kept his eyes straight ahead, down the hall and the stairs into the street, expecting to be arrested at any moment.”

    This closing line effectively conveys the danger and tension of the situation. It leaves the reader wondering about potential consequences and sets up suspense for future chapters.

    FAQs

    Answer:
    Elizabeth Manning was the first wife of Paul Manning, Stone’s client’s late husband. Stone reveals she came to the island out of curiosity about Paul’s death and potential interest in his estate. Their exchange of documents at dinner suggests legal discussions about her financial claims. This complicates Stone’s position because Sir Winston suspects Stone may be improperly involved in financial arrangements between the two Manning women, potentially breaching attorney-client confidentiality or engaging in unethical conduct by facilitating payments between them.

    2. How does Stone employ Mark Twain’s advice in his interaction with Sir Winston, and what does this reveal about his strategy?

    Answer:
    Stone follows Mark Twain’s advice to “tell the truth” when in doubt, admitting Elizabeth Manning’s identity and her connection to Paul Manning. This strategy demonstrates Stone’s calculated honesty—he shares enough factual information to appear cooperative while withholding sensitive details protected by attorney-client privilege. His selective truth-telling helps maintain credibility while avoiding self-incrimination or compromising his client’s interests, showing his legal acumen in navigating hostile questioning.

    3. Analyze the significance of Sir Winston’s questioning about Stone’s “services” to the second Mrs. Manning. What is he implying, and how does Stone respond?

    Answer:
    Sir Winston insinuates that Stone’s relationship with Mrs. Manning extends beyond legal representation, hinting at a romantic or sexual involvement (“you are fucking the lady”). This implication aims to undermine Stone’s professionalism and potentially discredit him. Stone deflects by questioning the propriety of such conjecture from a prosecutor, then pivots to attacking the prosecution’s merits. His indignant exit serves as both a tactical retreat and a statement of moral high ground.

    4. What does the chapter reveal about power dynamics between Stone and Sir Winston through their dialogue and body language?

    Answer:
    The power dynamic shifts throughout their confrontation. Initially, Sir Winston dominates with pointed questions and subtle threats (noting Stone’s “odd hours” on the yacht). Stone maintains composure but grows defensive when cornered about his personal conduct. The climax—Stone’s dramatic exit—reverses the dynamic, asserting his autonomy. Physical cues like Sir Winston’s “considerable full height” and Stone’s purposeful departure underscore their clash of authority, with neither fully yielding ground.

    5. How does the setting (lunch with lobster salad and champagne) contrast with the underlying tension of the conversation?

    Answer:
    The elegant luncheon setting—lobster salad, champagne, and petit fours—creates an ironic contrast with the escalating confrontation. The refined atmosphere initially masks the hostility, allowing both men to maintain decorum while probing sensitive topics. However, the shared meal becomes a battleground, with pauses for eating serving as tactical respites (Stone “grateful for the opportunity to collect his thoughts”). The juxtaposition highlights the duality of their interaction: superficially civil, fundamentally adversarial.

    Note