Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    Stone Bar­ring­ton, prepar­ing an open­ing state­ment for Alli­son Manning’s tri­al in his rent­ed room, is inter­rupt­ed by Thomas, who informs him that two police offi­cers are down­stairs request­ing him. The offi­cers refuse to explain their pur­pose but take the guest reg­is­tra­tion forms before escort­ing Stone to their car. Despite his protests, Stone is tak­en to Gov­ern­ment House, where he assumes he’s being arrest­ed, pos­si­bly due to his involve­ment in Allison’s case. The jour­ney is tense, with Stone spec­u­lat­ing about the charges, but the offi­cers remain cryp­tic, only hint­ing that he’s in “a lot of trou­ble.”

    Upon arrival, Stone is led through the build­ing to a wait­ing room, where he observes the for­mal yet worn sur­round­ings, includ­ing a por­trait of the prime min­is­ter. The offi­cers then direct him into a lav­ish office, where he’s left alone until Sir Win­ston Suther­land, the min­is­ter of jus­tice, enters. Sir Win­ston greets Stone warm­ly, dis­miss­ing any notion of an arrest and fram­ing the encounter as a pre­tri­al meet­ing between oppos­ing coun­sel. He invites Stone to a bal­cony lunch, offer­ing cham­pagne and pleas­antries, though Stone remains wary of the sud­den hos­pi­tal­i­ty.

    Over lunch, Sir Win­ston engages Stone in seem­ing­ly casu­al con­ver­sa­tion, touch­ing on top­ics like the recent plane crash of Chester, Alli­son Manning’s back­ground, and Stone’s own cir­cum­stances. Stone answers cau­tious­ly, deny­ing any pri­or con­nec­tion to Alli­son or her late hus­band. Sir Winston’s ques­tions grow more point­ed, prob­ing Stone’s involve­ment in the coroner’s inquest and Allison’s iden­ti­ty. Stone deflects, but the ten­sion ris­es as Sir Winston’s friend­ly demeanor masks an under­ly­ing inter­ro­ga­tion.

    The chap­ter cul­mi­nates with Sir Win­ston pro­duc­ing a slip of paper and direct­ly ask­ing Stone about Eliz­a­beth Alli­son Manning’s true iden­ti­ty. Stone’s inter­nal reaction—“Oh, shit”—signals his real­iza­tion that Sir Win­ston is onto some­thing sig­nif­i­cant. The encounter, framed as a polite lunch, reveals itself as a strate­gic move by Sir Win­ston to extract infor­ma­tion, leav­ing Stone in a pre­car­i­ous posi­tion as the tri­al approach­es. The chap­ter ends on a cliffhang­er, hint­ing at deep­er secrets sur­round­ing Allison’s case.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is the significance of Stone being taken to Government House by the police officers, and how does this scene establish tension in the narrative?

      Answer:
      The scene creates tension through ambiguity and authority. Stone is forcibly taken to Government House under unclear circumstances, with officers refusing to explain why (“You in a lot of trouble, man”). The location itself is ominous, as Stone notes the jail is in the basement. This establishes a power imbalance and foreshadows legal threats, especially since Stone is defending Allison Manning—a potentially controversial role in St. Marks. The tension escalates when Sir Winston later claims it’s merely a “pretrial meeting,” leaving readers questioning his true intentions.

      2. Analyze Sir Winston Sutherland’s demeanor during his interaction with Stone. How does his behavior contrast with the initial police encounter, and what might this reveal about his character?

      Answer:
      Sir Winston employs a facade of hospitality—champagne, a balcony lunch, and faux concern (“I hope the two officers were not officious”)—that starkly contrasts the officers’ brusque commands (“Get in the car”). This juxtaposition highlights his manipulative nature. His charm serves to disarm Stone while subtly probing for information (e.g., questioning Allison’s identity). The contrast suggests Sir Winston wields power through both intimidation (via the police) and calculated diplomacy, reinforcing his role as a politically savvy antagonist.

      3. Why does Stone’s internal reaction to Sir Winston’s question about Elizabeth Allison Manning (“Oh, shit”) signal a critical turning point in the chapter?

      Answer:
      Stone’s panic reveals the question’s gravity: Sir Winston is scrutinizing Allison’s identity, implying he suspects deception. This moment shifts the chapter from polite tension to high stakes, as Stone realizes the minister may uncover damaging secrets. It also underscores Stone’s vulnerability—his legal strategy (and possibly Allison’s safety) hinges on maintaining her credibility. The expletive, rare in Stone’s composed narration, emphasizes the threat Sir Winston poses, setting up future conflict.

      4. How does the chapter use physical setting to reflect power dynamics? Provide specific examples.

      Answer:
      Settings mirror hierarchy and control. The police station’s oppressive atmosphere (ceiling fans, “open to the air”) reflects colonial authority, while Sir Winston’s lavish office—with its balcony view and “perfectly chilled” champagne—symbolizes his dominance. Stone is physically escorted through these spaces, emphasizing his subordinate status. Even the “benevolent-looking” prime minister’s portrait looms over the waiting room, a reminder of institutional power. These details reinforce St. Marks’s systemic control over outsiders like Stone.

      Answer:
      Stone’s compliance (“walked toward the car without another word”) shows pragmatic awareness of St. Marks’s authoritarian norms. He recognizes resistance could escalate danger, trusting Thomas to intervene later. His internal monologue—speculating that representing Allison might itself be a crime—reveals his grasp of the system’s corruption. By prioritizing caution over confrontation, Stone demonstrates a survival instinct shaped by the island’s unchecked power structures, where legal rights are tenuous at best.

    Quotes

    • 1. “‘Am I under arrest?’ ‘Get in the car,’ the man repeated.”

      This tense exchange captures the abrupt, authoritarian nature of Stone’s detainment, setting the ominous tone for the chapter. The officers’ refusal to answer basic questions highlights the power dynamics at play in St. Marks.

      2. “‘You in a lot of trouble, man.’ ‘What kind of trouble?’ ‘You see pretty quick.’”

      This cryptic warning from the officer creates suspense while revealing the arbitrary nature of justice in St. Marks. The vagueness suggests Stone’s predicament stems from political motivations rather than legal ones.

      3. “‘Oh, I hope the two officers were not officious,’ Sir Winston said, sounding genuinely concerned. ‘Am I under arrest?’ ‘Of course not, my dear fellow, of course not.’”

      This exchange reveals Sir Winston’s manipulative charm and the stark contrast between his polite facade and the threatening reality of Stone’s forced appearance. The juxtaposition highlights the chapter’s theme of deceptive appearances.

      4. “‘Tell me—who, exactly, is, or perhaps I should say was, Elizabeth Allison Manning?’ Stone took a long swallow of his champagne. Oh, shit, he thought.”

      This climactic moment reveals Sir Winston’s true agenda and Stone’s realization of the danger. The internal monologue perfectly captures the protagonist’s dawning comprehension that he’s been maneuvered into a trap.

    Quotes

    1. “‘Am I under arrest?’ ‘Get in the car,’ the man repeated.”

    This tense exchange captures the abrupt, authoritarian nature of Stone’s detainment, setting the ominous tone for the chapter. The officers’ refusal to answer basic questions highlights the power dynamics at play in St. Marks.

    2. “‘You in a lot of trouble, man.’ ‘What kind of trouble?’ ‘You see pretty quick.’”

    This cryptic warning from the officer creates suspense while revealing the arbitrary nature of justice in St. Marks. The vagueness suggests Stone’s predicament stems from political motivations rather than legal ones.

    3. “‘Oh, I hope the two officers were not officious,’ Sir Winston said, sounding genuinely concerned. ‘Am I under arrest?’ ‘Of course not, my dear fellow, of course not.’”

    This exchange reveals Sir Winston’s manipulative charm and the stark contrast between his polite facade and the threatening reality of Stone’s forced appearance. The juxtaposition highlights the chapter’s theme of deceptive appearances.

    4. “‘Tell me—who, exactly, is, or perhaps I should say was, Elizabeth Allison Manning?’ Stone took a long swallow of his champagne. Oh, shit, he thought.”

    This climactic moment reveals Sir Winston’s true agenda and Stone’s realization of the danger. The internal monologue perfectly captures the protagonist’s dawning comprehension that he’s been maneuvered into a trap.

    FAQs

    1. What is the significance of Stone being taken to Government House by the police officers, and how does this scene establish tension in the narrative?

    Answer:
    The scene creates tension through ambiguity and authority. Stone is forcibly taken to Government House under unclear circumstances, with officers refusing to explain why (“You in a lot of trouble, man”). The location itself is ominous, as Stone notes the jail is in the basement. This establishes a power imbalance and foreshadows legal threats, especially since Stone is defending Allison Manning—a potentially controversial role in St. Marks. The tension escalates when Sir Winston later claims it’s merely a “pretrial meeting,” leaving readers questioning his true intentions.

    2. Analyze Sir Winston Sutherland’s demeanor during his interaction with Stone. How does his behavior contrast with the initial police encounter, and what might this reveal about his character?

    Answer:
    Sir Winston employs a facade of hospitality—champagne, a balcony lunch, and faux concern (“I hope the two officers were not officious”)—that starkly contrasts the officers’ brusque commands (“Get in the car”). This juxtaposition highlights his manipulative nature. His charm serves to disarm Stone while subtly probing for information (e.g., questioning Allison’s identity). The contrast suggests Sir Winston wields power through both intimidation (via the police) and calculated diplomacy, reinforcing his role as a politically savvy antagonist.

    3. Why does Stone’s internal reaction to Sir Winston’s question about Elizabeth Allison Manning (“Oh, shit”) signal a critical turning point in the chapter?

    Answer:
    Stone’s panic reveals the question’s gravity: Sir Winston is scrutinizing Allison’s identity, implying he suspects deception. This moment shifts the chapter from polite tension to high stakes, as Stone realizes the minister may uncover damaging secrets. It also underscores Stone’s vulnerability—his legal strategy (and possibly Allison’s safety) hinges on maintaining her credibility. The expletive, rare in Stone’s composed narration, emphasizes the threat Sir Winston poses, setting up future conflict.

    4. How does the chapter use physical setting to reflect power dynamics? Provide specific examples.

    Answer:
    Settings mirror hierarchy and control. The police station’s oppressive atmosphere (ceiling fans, “open to the air”) reflects colonial authority, while Sir Winston’s lavish office—with its balcony view and “perfectly chilled” champagne—symbolizes his dominance. Stone is physically escorted through these spaces, emphasizing his subordinate status. Even the “benevolent-looking” prime minister’s portrait looms over the waiting room, a reminder of institutional power. These details reinforce St. Marks’s systemic control over outsiders like Stone.

    Answer:
    Stone’s compliance (“walked toward the car without another word”) shows pragmatic awareness of St. Marks’s authoritarian norms. He recognizes resistance could escalate danger, trusting Thomas to intervene later. His internal monologue—speculating that representing Allison might itself be a crime—reveals his grasp of the system’s corruption. By prioritizing caution over confrontation, Stone demonstrates a survival instinct shaped by the island’s unchecked power structures, where legal rights are tenuous at best.

    Note