Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    Stone Bar­ring­ton is engaged in con­ver­sa­tion with Jim For­rester when a mid­dle-aged woman arrives at the scene. Dressed in a wrin­kled silk dress and a straw hat, she intro­duces her­self as Alli­son Man­ning, the wid­ow of Paul Man­ning, a deceased writer. She claims to be his legit­i­mate wife and presents a mar­riage cer­tifi­cate as proof. Stone, skep­ti­cal but intrigued, ques­tions her fur­ther while order­ing her a drink. The woman, who insists on being called Lib­by, reveals she has come to St. Marks to claim Paul’s estate, assert­ing she was nev­er divorced from him and pos­sess­es a will nam­ing her as the sole ben­e­fi­cia­ry.

    Lib­by explains her his­to­ry with Paul, stat­ing they met while work­ing at the Mia­mi Her­ald and mar­ried 14 years pri­or. She admits he left her after four years but con­tin­ued to sup­port her finan­cial­ly until his death. Stone informs her that Paul’s estate is being han­dled in Con­necti­cut, where anoth­er woman—also claim­ing to be his wife—has a more recent will. Lib­by dis­miss­es this, insist­ing she is the only legal wife. Stone, wary of her motives, avoids offer­ing legal advice but sug­gests her claim would need to be addressed in Con­necti­cut, not St. Marks.

    Frus­trat­ed, Lib­by declares her inten­tion to seek a sec­ond opin­ion and inves­ti­gate the mur­der tri­al sur­round­ing Paul’s death. Stone grows increas­ing­ly con­cerned about her poten­tial inter­fer­ence, espe­cial­ly if she involves local author­i­ties like Sir Win­ston Suther­land. After she leaves for her room, Stone urgent­ly calls Bob Can­tor, request­ing a copy of Paul’s divorce decree to ver­i­fy Libby’s claims. He con­fides in Thomas Hardy, who finds the sit­u­a­tion amus­ing but agrees to keep Lib­by away from Suther­land.

    The chap­ter ends with Stone grap­pling with the com­pli­ca­tions posed by Libby’s sud­den appear­ance. Her claims threat­en to dis­rupt the ongo­ing legal pro­ceed­ings and estate mat­ters, adding anoth­er lay­er of com­plex­i­ty to an already con­vo­lut­ed case. Stone’s des­per­a­tion to neu­tral­ize her influ­ence under­scores the ten­sion, while Thomas’s amuse­ment high­lights the absur­di­ty of the sit­u­a­tion. The stage is set for fur­ther con­flict as Lib­by vows to pur­sue her claims, ensur­ing more chal­lenges lie ahead for Stone.

    FAQs

    • Answer:
      Libby Manning reveals that she was legally married to Paul Manning 14 years prior in Florida and they were never divorced, presenting a marriage certificate as proof. This creates a legal complication because Stone Barrington is currently representing another woman (Allison Manning) who claims to be Paul’s widow and beneficiary of his estate. If Libby’s claim is valid, it would invalidate the newer will and potentially make her the rightful heir, disrupting the existing estate proceedings in Connecticut.

      2. Analyze Stone Barrington’s reaction to Libby Manning’s arrival. What does his behavior suggest about his concerns in this situation?

      Answer:
      Stone exhibits immediate discomfort and wariness upon meeting Libby, asking for identification and probing her story carefully. His urgent call to Bob Cantor to verify Paul’s Florida divorce shows he views her as a serious threat to his case. His attempts to dissuade her from pursuing legal action in St. Marks (“I’m afraid you’ve come a long way for nothing”) and his warning to Thomas about Sir Winston Sutherland reveal his concern that her presence could complicate Allison Manning’s murder trial and estate claims.

      3. How does Libby Manning characterize her financial relationship with Paul Manning after their separation, and why is this significant?

      Answer:
      Libby states that Paul continued supporting her with monthly checks through his Miami lawyer until his death, which she relied on for living expenses (supplementing her modest income as a society columnist). This is significant because it establishes a continued financial relationship that could support her claim of being his legal wife. The missed payment (which prompted her trip) also demonstrates her financial dependence on Paul, motivating her to secure his estate.

      4. What strategic mistake does Stone make in his conversation with Libby, and how might it backfire?

      Answer:
      Stone inadvertently reveals that Paul’s estate is being handled in Connecticut and mentions the “more recent Mrs. Manning,” giving Libby critical information she could use to challenge the will. This might backfire by directing her to contest the estate in Connecticut rather than dismissing her claim entirely. His transparency—while attempting to discourage her—actually arms her with the knowledge needed to escalate the legal battle.

      5. Why does Thomas Hardy’s reaction to the “another Allison Manning” situation contrast with Stone’s, and what does this imply about their roles?

      Answer:
      Thomas chuckles at the absurdity of the situation, while Stone is visibly stressed. This contrast highlights their differing roles: Stone, as the lawyer, bears the legal burden of resolving conflicting claims, whereas Thomas serves as a more detached observer. Thomas’s amusement suggests he recognizes the dramatic irony of the predicament, while Stone’s urgency underscores his professional responsibility to protect his client’s interests.

    Quotes

    • 1. “I’m Paul Manning’s widow,” the woman said, “and I’m not very well, if the truth be told. However, I expect to be a lot better quite soon.”

      This quote introduces the central conflict of the chapter—the sudden appearance of a woman claiming to be Paul Manning’s legal widow. Her cryptic statement about expecting to “be a lot better quite soon” hints at her financial motives and sets the stage for the legal battle over Manning’s estate.

      2. “Paul and I were never divorced; we were married until the day he died.”

      This declaration is the linchpin of Libby Manning’s claim to her husband’s estate. It directly contradicts the existence of the “other Mrs. Manning” and forces Stone to reconsider the entire legal foundation of the case he’s handling.

      3. “You’re representing Allison Manning,” she said. “Why don’t you tell me what’s going on here?”

      This moment marks a key turning point where the tables turn—the mysterious woman challenges Stone’s position rather than the other way around. It shows her assertiveness and shifts the power dynamic in their conversation.

      4. “Well, tomorrow’s another day, and then I guess I’ll see what I can find out about this murder trial. Who’s the DA?”

      This quote reveals Libby Manning’s determination to pursue her claim and her willingness to involve herself in the murder trial aspect of the case. It introduces a new layer of complication that Stone desperately wants to avoid.

      5. “I’ve got another Allison Manning on my hands.”

      Stone’s urgent phone call to Bob Cantor captures the shocking realization that threatens to upend his entire case. This concise statement perfectly summarizes the chapter’s cliffhanger ending and the legal nightmare now facing Stone.

    Quotes

    1. “I’m Paul Manning’s widow,” the woman said, “and I’m not very well, if the truth be told. However, I expect to be a lot better quite soon.”

    This quote introduces the central conflict of the chapter—the sudden appearance of a woman claiming to be Paul Manning’s legal widow. Her cryptic statement about expecting to “be a lot better quite soon” hints at her financial motives and sets the stage for the legal battle over Manning’s estate.

    2. “Paul and I were never divorced; we were married until the day he died.”

    This declaration is the linchpin of Libby Manning’s claim to her husband’s estate. It directly contradicts the existence of the “other Mrs. Manning” and forces Stone to reconsider the entire legal foundation of the case he’s handling.

    3. “You’re representing Allison Manning,” she said. “Why don’t you tell me what’s going on here?”

    This moment marks a key turning point where the tables turn—the mysterious woman challenges Stone’s position rather than the other way around. It shows her assertiveness and shifts the power dynamic in their conversation.

    4. “Well, tomorrow’s another day, and then I guess I’ll see what I can find out about this murder trial. Who’s the DA?”

    This quote reveals Libby Manning’s determination to pursue her claim and her willingness to involve herself in the murder trial aspect of the case. It introduces a new layer of complication that Stone desperately wants to avoid.

    5. “I’ve got another Allison Manning on my hands.”

    Stone’s urgent phone call to Bob Cantor captures the shocking realization that threatens to upend his entire case. This concise statement perfectly summarizes the chapter’s cliffhanger ending and the legal nightmare now facing Stone.

    FAQs

    Answer:
    Libby Manning reveals that she was legally married to Paul Manning 14 years prior in Florida and they were never divorced, presenting a marriage certificate as proof. This creates a legal complication because Stone Barrington is currently representing another woman (Allison Manning) who claims to be Paul’s widow and beneficiary of his estate. If Libby’s claim is valid, it would invalidate the newer will and potentially make her the rightful heir, disrupting the existing estate proceedings in Connecticut.

    2. Analyze Stone Barrington’s reaction to Libby Manning’s arrival. What does his behavior suggest about his concerns in this situation?

    Answer:
    Stone exhibits immediate discomfort and wariness upon meeting Libby, asking for identification and probing her story carefully. His urgent call to Bob Cantor to verify Paul’s Florida divorce shows he views her as a serious threat to his case. His attempts to dissuade her from pursuing legal action in St. Marks (“I’m afraid you’ve come a long way for nothing”) and his warning to Thomas about Sir Winston Sutherland reveal his concern that her presence could complicate Allison Manning’s murder trial and estate claims.

    3. How does Libby Manning characterize her financial relationship with Paul Manning after their separation, and why is this significant?

    Answer:
    Libby states that Paul continued supporting her with monthly checks through his Miami lawyer until his death, which she relied on for living expenses (supplementing her modest income as a society columnist). This is significant because it establishes a continued financial relationship that could support her claim of being his legal wife. The missed payment (which prompted her trip) also demonstrates her financial dependence on Paul, motivating her to secure his estate.

    4. What strategic mistake does Stone make in his conversation with Libby, and how might it backfire?

    Answer:
    Stone inadvertently reveals that Paul’s estate is being handled in Connecticut and mentions the “more recent Mrs. Manning,” giving Libby critical information she could use to challenge the will. This might backfire by directing her to contest the estate in Connecticut rather than dismissing her claim entirely. His transparency—while attempting to discourage her—actually arms her with the knowledge needed to escalate the legal battle.

    5. Why does Thomas Hardy’s reaction to the “another Allison Manning” situation contrast with Stone’s, and what does this imply about their roles?

    Answer:
    Thomas chuckles at the absurdity of the situation, while Stone is visibly stressed. This contrast highlights their differing roles: Stone, as the lawyer, bears the legal burden of resolving conflicting claims, whereas Thomas serves as a more detached observer. Thomas’s amusement suggests he recognizes the dramatic irony of the predicament, while Stone’s urgency underscores his professional responsibility to protect his client’s interests.

    Note