Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    Stone watch­es ner­vous­ly as Alli­son Man­ning, a wid­ow accused of mur­der­ing her hus­band, under­goes a tele­vised inter­view with reporter Chris Wheaton. Despite his fears, Alli­son han­dles the ini­tial sail­ing-relat­ed ques­tions with ease, explain­ing how she man­aged to sail their yacht alone after her husband’s death. Jim For­rester, a jour­nal­ist from *The New York­er*, observes qui­et­ly. Wheaton shifts to prob­ing Allison’s mar­riage, search­ing for motives, but Alli­son remains com­posed, answer­ing can­did­ly. Stone is impressed by her resilience, though he remains wary of the interview’s poten­tial pit­falls.

    The inter­view takes a sharp­er turn when Wheaton asks about Allison’s finan­cial sit­u­a­tion, includ­ing her husband’s life insur­ance and their mort­gaged assets. Alli­son admits igno­rance of their finances, empha­siz­ing her domes­tic role. She express­es uncer­tain­ty about keep­ing their large house or yacht, cit­ing emo­tion­al pain. Her tear­ful response strikes Stone as gen­uine, rein­forc­ing his belief in her inno­cence. The inter­view con­tin­ues smooth­ly, with Alli­son main­tain­ing her poise through mul­ti­ple tape changes, leav­ing Wheaton and the crew vis­i­bly impressed.

    After the inter­view, Alli­son casu­al­ly engages with Wheaton and For­rester, agree­ing to a fol­low-up dis­cus­sion with the lat­ter. As they depart, Wheaton pri­vate­ly prais­es Allison’s per­for­mance but shocks Stone by con­fess­ing she believes Alli­son is guilty. Wheaton, draw­ing on her expe­ri­ence inter­view­ing accused crim­i­nals, insists Allison’s flaw­less demeanor masks guilt. Stone defends Alli­son, chal­leng­ing Wheaton to find incon­sis­ten­cies, but she dis­miss­es his argu­ments, attribut­ing her cer­tain­ty to intu­ition. Despite her per­son­al doubts, Wheaton assures Stone the broad­cast will por­tray Alli­son sym­pa­thet­i­cal­ly, align­ing with his goals.

    Wheaton’s final warn­ing leaves Stone stunned: she cau­tions him against emo­tion­al or phys­i­cal involve­ment with Alli­son, label­ing her “dan­ger­ous.” Stone is left speech­less, grap­pling with Wheaton’s stark con­trast between Allison’s pub­lic image and her pri­vate sus­pi­cions. The chap­ter ends with Stone’s inter­nal conflict—his pro­fes­sion­al duty to defend Alli­son clash­es with Wheaton’s unset­tling ver­dict, cast­ing doubt on his client’s inno­cence and his own judg­ment.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does Allison Manning demonstrate her sailing knowledge during the interview, and why is this significant?

      Answer:
      Allison explains that while she initially relied on her husband Paul for sailing, she taught herself celestial navigation to determine latitude and managed the sails primarily using the main sail after his death. This demonstrates her ability to adapt and acquire crucial skills under pressure. The significance lies in establishing her credibility as someone capable of single-handedly sailing a large yacht across the Atlantic, countering potential skepticism about her story. Her detailed technical response also helps humanize her to the audience, making her appear resourceful rather than suspicious.

      2. What does Chris Wheaton’s questioning strategy reveal about her suspicions of Allison?

      Answer:
      Wheaton initially asks “softball” sailing questions to build rapport but later shifts to probing Allison’s marriage dynamics and financial motives (e.g., life insurance, property ownership). This strategy reveals her underlying suspicion that Allison may have murdered her husband. By circling back to the same topics, Wheaton tests the consistency of Allison’s answers—a common tactic to uncover deception. Her private comment to Stone (“she’s not [innocent]”) confirms she views Allison’s polished performance as a red flag, despite finding no factual holes in her story.

      3. Analyze the significance of Jim Forrester’s presence during the interview.

      Answer:
      Forrester, a journalist from The New Yorker, takes detailed notes, suggesting he is investigating Allison’s story independently. His prior acquaintance with Allison and Paul in Las Palmas adds credibility to his interest. His request for a follow-up interview hints at deeper scrutiny, possibly foreshadowing future revelations. His silent observation contrasts with Wheaton’s performative questioning, implying a more methodical approach to uncovering the truth, which may become relevant later in the narrative.

      4. How does Allison’s emotional response to questions about her future plans serve her public image?

      Answer:
      When asked about keeping the house or yacht, Allison brushes away tears while stating the memories are too painful without Paul. This vulnerability humanizes her, making her appear grief-stricken rather than calculating. Her hesitation about financial matters (e.g., “I just haven’t thought that far ahead”) reinforces an image of a widow overwhelmed by loss, not a schemer. Stone notes this is “perfect” for garnering public sympathy, which could influence both the TV audience and potential jurors.

      5. Why does Chris Wheaton warn Stone not to become romantically involved with Allison, and what does this reveal about narrative tension?

      Answer:
      Wheaton’s warning (“Allison Manning is a dangerous woman”) stems from her professional intuition that Allison is guilty, despite the lack of evidence. This creates dramatic irony—Stone believes in her innocence, while Wheaton’s perspective hints at unseen danger. The advice heightens tension by suggesting Allison’s charm may be manipulative, foreshadowing potential betrayal or conflict. It also challenges Stone’s judgment, setting up future dilemmas if his personal feelings cloud his legal defense.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Allison, how much life insurance did your husband have?…I do know from what Paul said in passing that although he owned an expensive house and boat, they both have large mortgages on them, so I don’t know yet what will be left when everything is settled.”

      This quote reveals Allison’s financial ignorance about her husband’s affairs, which becomes a key point in the murder investigation. It shows her vulnerability while also raising questions about potential motives.

      2. “She’s really something…You won’t have any trouble getting her off…Not for a minute…I look in those beautiful blue eyes and I know.”

      Chris Wheaton’s private assessment of Allison’s guilt contrasts sharply with her professional stance. This duality highlights the tension between public perception and private judgment in high-profile cases.

      3. “Unless I can dig up something new between now and Sunday.”

      This ominous statement from the reporter creates suspense about potential revelations that could undermine Allison’s defense. It foreshadows possible future developments in the case.

      4. “don’t fall in love with her; don’t even fuck her, if you haven’t already. Allison Manning is a dangerous woman.”

      The chapter’s most striking warning encapsulates the central tension - Allison’s apparent innocence versus the growing suspicion about her true nature. It serves as a dramatic climax to the interview scene.

    Quotes

    1. “Allison, how much life insurance did your husband have?…I do know from what Paul said in passing that although he owned an expensive house and boat, they both have large mortgages on them, so I don’t know yet what will be left when everything is settled.”

    This quote reveals Allison’s financial ignorance about her husband’s affairs, which becomes a key point in the murder investigation. It shows her vulnerability while also raising questions about potential motives.

    2. “She’s really something…You won’t have any trouble getting her off…Not for a minute…I look in those beautiful blue eyes and I know.”

    Chris Wheaton’s private assessment of Allison’s guilt contrasts sharply with her professional stance. This duality highlights the tension between public perception and private judgment in high-profile cases.

    3. “Unless I can dig up something new between now and Sunday.”

    This ominous statement from the reporter creates suspense about potential revelations that could undermine Allison’s defense. It foreshadows possible future developments in the case.

    4. “don’t fall in love with her; don’t even fuck her, if you haven’t already. Allison Manning is a dangerous woman.”

    The chapter’s most striking warning encapsulates the central tension - Allison’s apparent innocence versus the growing suspicion about her true nature. It serves as a dramatic climax to the interview scene.

    FAQs

    1. How does Allison Manning demonstrate her sailing knowledge during the interview, and why is this significant?

    Answer:
    Allison explains that while she initially relied on her husband Paul for sailing, she taught herself celestial navigation to determine latitude and managed the sails primarily using the main sail after his death. This demonstrates her ability to adapt and acquire crucial skills under pressure. The significance lies in establishing her credibility as someone capable of single-handedly sailing a large yacht across the Atlantic, countering potential skepticism about her story. Her detailed technical response also helps humanize her to the audience, making her appear resourceful rather than suspicious.

    2. What does Chris Wheaton’s questioning strategy reveal about her suspicions of Allison?

    Answer:
    Wheaton initially asks “softball” sailing questions to build rapport but later shifts to probing Allison’s marriage dynamics and financial motives (e.g., life insurance, property ownership). This strategy reveals her underlying suspicion that Allison may have murdered her husband. By circling back to the same topics, Wheaton tests the consistency of Allison’s answers—a common tactic to uncover deception. Her private comment to Stone (“she’s not [innocent]”) confirms she views Allison’s polished performance as a red flag, despite finding no factual holes in her story.

    3. Analyze the significance of Jim Forrester’s presence during the interview.

    Answer:
    Forrester, a journalist from The New Yorker, takes detailed notes, suggesting he is investigating Allison’s story independently. His prior acquaintance with Allison and Paul in Las Palmas adds credibility to his interest. His request for a follow-up interview hints at deeper scrutiny, possibly foreshadowing future revelations. His silent observation contrasts with Wheaton’s performative questioning, implying a more methodical approach to uncovering the truth, which may become relevant later in the narrative.

    4. How does Allison’s emotional response to questions about her future plans serve her public image?

    Answer:
    When asked about keeping the house or yacht, Allison brushes away tears while stating the memories are too painful without Paul. This vulnerability humanizes her, making her appear grief-stricken rather than calculating. Her hesitation about financial matters (e.g., “I just haven’t thought that far ahead”) reinforces an image of a widow overwhelmed by loss, not a schemer. Stone notes this is “perfect” for garnering public sympathy, which could influence both the TV audience and potential jurors.

    5. Why does Chris Wheaton warn Stone not to become romantically involved with Allison, and what does this reveal about narrative tension?

    Answer:
    Wheaton’s warning (“Allison Manning is a dangerous woman”) stems from her professional intuition that Allison is guilty, despite the lack of evidence. This creates dramatic irony—Stone believes in her innocence, while Wheaton’s perspective hints at unseen danger. The advice heightens tension by suggesting Allison’s charm may be manipulative, foreshadowing potential betrayal or conflict. It also challenges Stone’s judgment, setting up future dilemmas if his personal feelings cloud his legal defense.

    Note