Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    Stone receives a phone call from Bob Can­tor in New York, who pro­vides back­ground infor­ma­tion on Alli­son Man­ning and her hus­band, Paul. While details about Alli­son are scarce, Can­tor reveals that Paul is a suc­cess­ful writer with a lucra­tive book con­tract, a lav­ish lifestyle, and sig­nif­i­cant assets, includ­ing a mul­ti-mil­lion-dol­lar home and a yacht. How­ev­er, Paul also car­ries sub­stan­tial debts, includ­ing a large mort­gage and cred­it card bal­ances. The con­ver­sa­tion sug­gests that while Paul appears wealthy, his finan­cial sit­u­a­tion is more pre­car­i­ous than it seems, with a net worth esti­mat­ed at five to six mil­lion dol­lars.

    Can­tor fur­ther dis­clos­es that Paul has no crim­i­nal record and only one ex-wife, with a brief mar­riage that end­ed before his finan­cial suc­cess. Paul’s career began in jour­nal­ism before he tran­si­tioned to full-time writ­ing, earn­ing acco­lades and awards. The call ends abrupt­ly as Can­tor must board his flight, leav­ing Stone with pre­lim­i­nary but incon­clu­sive infor­ma­tion. Stone express­es frus­tra­tion to Thomas, the bar­tender, about the lack of progress in Allison’s case, though the back­ground on Paul pro­vides some con­text.

    Thomas men­tions increased media inter­est in Allison’s case, with more reporters arriv­ing in St. Marks. Stone, con­cerned about Allison’s pri­va­cy, arranges for secu­ri­ty at the mari­na with Thomas’s help, lever­ag­ing his con­nec­tions with local police. Their con­ver­sa­tion shifts to Thomas’s large fam­i­ly, high­light­ing their pros­per­i­ty in St. Marks, which adds a per­son­al touch to the oth­er­wise tense nar­ra­tive.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Stone receiv­ing a fax from Arring­ton, who informs him she is leav­ing for Los Ange­les indef­i­nite­ly. Her detached tone unset­tles Stone, prompt­ing him to react emo­tion­al­ly by tear­ing up the fax. His resent­ment fuels a resolve to con­tin­ue his affair with Alli­son, reflect­ing his per­son­al tur­moil. The chap­ter ends with Stone return­ing to work on Allison’s case, blend­ing pro­fes­sion­al duty with his unre­solved per­son­al emo­tions.

    FAQs

    • 1. What key financial and personal details does Cantor reveal about Paul Manning in his phone call with Stone?

      Answer:
      Cantor provides a comprehensive financial profile of Paul Manning, revealing he is a successful writer who secured a \(4.5 million contract for two books. Manning owns a lavish Greenwich estate worth \)3.5–4 million (with a \(2 million mortgage), a yacht with a \)1.2 million debt, and carries \(60,000 in credit card debt. His net worth is estimated at \)5–6 million, including pending book payments. Personally, Manning has no criminal record, was previously married (divorced a month before marrying Allison), and worked as a journalist before becoming a full-time writer. Cantor also notes Manning’s spending habits align with his income but leave him leveraged.

      2. How does Stone’s reaction to Arrington’s fax reveal his emotional state and priorities?

      Answer:
      Stone’s response to Arrington’s fax—where she informs him she’s leaving for L.A. with Vance—is notably bitter. He fixates on her closing (“Best” instead of “Love”), interprets it as emotional distance, and reacts by tearing up the fax. His immediate thought—being “glad he’d fucked Allison Manning” and vowing to continue—suggests he’s using physical intimacy as a coping mechanism for rejection. This reveals his vulnerability, pride, and a tendency to deflect emotional pain through control or retaliation, even as he outwardly focuses on Allison’s legal case.

      3. What logistical and security concerns arise for Allison Manning’s case, and how does Stone address them?

      Answer:
      With the press descending on St. Marks for Allison’s case, Stone anticipates privacy and security risks, particularly around her yacht. He enlists Thomas’s connections—two police sergeant brothers—to organize round-the-clock security (two officers at a time) at the marina. This proactive measure reflects Stone’s attention to Allison’s need for privacy amid media scrutiny and his reliance on local networks (Thomas’s family) to navigate challenges in St. Marks. The plan also hints at the growing public interest in the case, which could complicate legal proceedings.

      Answer:
      Paul Manning’s financial profile is double-edged for Allison’s case. On one hand, his wealth (via book contracts and assets) suggests Allison could access funds for her defense. However, his high leverage ($3.2 million in combined debt) and spending habits imply liquidity issues—he may not have readily available cash. The life insurance policy (hinted at by the Chubb inquiry) could be a motive if Allison is accused of his death, but Cantor finds no evidence of financial strife (e.g., late payments). This complicates theories of Allison’s guilt while leaving financial motives ambiguous.

      5. How does Thomas’s family background illustrate the socioeconomic context of St. Marks?

      Answer:
      Thomas’s description of his large family (six brothers, four sisters) reflects St. Marks’ pre-tourism era, where limited opportunities led to emigration or local careers like policing. His siblings’ paths—two sergeants, others returning after leaving—show how tourism later improved prosperity. The sisters’ traditional roles (“married and had babies”) contrast with Thomas’s entrepreneurial success, highlighting gendered divides. His network also underscores how familial ties function as social capital in St. Marks, enabling Stone to secure security through Thomas’s connections—a detail that emphasizes community interdependence on the island.

    Quotes

    • 1. “He’s got a two-million-dollar mortgage on the house—that’s about the max you could get at that level—and he owes a million two on the boat. There’s some smaller stuff, but not that small; he’s got sixty grand in credit card debt and a line of credit secured by the equity in the house—three hundred thousand—and half that is used up.”

      This quote reveals the financial pressures Paul Manning was under despite his apparent wealth, providing crucial context for understanding his character and potential motives. It highlights the disparity between his lavish lifestyle and his actual financial stability.

      2. “In short, he lives like a prince, but he’s not all that rich.”

      This concise summary captures the essence of Paul Manning’s financial situation, contrasting his extravagant lifestyle with his more modest net worth. It’s a pivotal insight that could inform later plot developments regarding his character.

      3. “I’ve no idea how long I’ll be out there, but it’s going to be at least a couple of weeks. I’ll call you when you’re back in New York. Best, Arrington.”

      This seemingly casual message carries emotional weight, showing the strain in Stone’s personal relationship. The formal closing (“Best” instead of “Love”) subtly signals relationship troubles that affect Stone’s state of mind.

      4. “He didn’t like the sound of that in the least, and he was suddenly very glad he’d fucked Allison Manning. He would do it again, every chance he had, for as long as he could.”

      This raw, emotional reaction reveals Stone’s complex psychology and how personal disappointments influence his professional conduct. It shows a significant character moment where personal and professional boundaries blur.

    Quotes

    1. “He’s got a two-million-dollar mortgage on the house—that’s about the max you could get at that level—and he owes a million two on the boat. There’s some smaller stuff, but not that small; he’s got sixty grand in credit card debt and a line of credit secured by the equity in the house—three hundred thousand—and half that is used up.”

    This quote reveals the financial pressures Paul Manning was under despite his apparent wealth, providing crucial context for understanding his character and potential motives. It highlights the disparity between his lavish lifestyle and his actual financial stability.

    2. “In short, he lives like a prince, but he’s not all that rich.”

    This concise summary captures the essence of Paul Manning’s financial situation, contrasting his extravagant lifestyle with his more modest net worth. It’s a pivotal insight that could inform later plot developments regarding his character.

    3. “I’ve no idea how long I’ll be out there, but it’s going to be at least a couple of weeks. I’ll call you when you’re back in New York. Best, Arrington.”

    This seemingly casual message carries emotional weight, showing the strain in Stone’s personal relationship. The formal closing (“Best” instead of “Love”) subtly signals relationship troubles that affect Stone’s state of mind.

    4. “He didn’t like the sound of that in the least, and he was suddenly very glad he’d fucked Allison Manning. He would do it again, every chance he had, for as long as he could.”

    This raw, emotional reaction reveals Stone’s complex psychology and how personal disappointments influence his professional conduct. It shows a significant character moment where personal and professional boundaries blur.

    FAQs

    1. What key financial and personal details does Cantor reveal about Paul Manning in his phone call with Stone?

    Answer:
    Cantor provides a comprehensive financial profile of Paul Manning, revealing he is a successful writer who secured a \(4.5 million contract for two books. Manning owns a lavish Greenwich estate worth \)3.5–4 million (with a \(2 million mortgage), a yacht with a \)1.2 million debt, and carries \(60,000 in credit card debt. His net worth is estimated at \)5–6 million, including pending book payments. Personally, Manning has no criminal record, was previously married (divorced a month before marrying Allison), and worked as a journalist before becoming a full-time writer. Cantor also notes Manning’s spending habits align with his income but leave him leveraged.

    2. How does Stone’s reaction to Arrington’s fax reveal his emotional state and priorities?

    Answer:
    Stone’s response to Arrington’s fax—where she informs him she’s leaving for L.A. with Vance—is notably bitter. He fixates on her closing (“Best” instead of “Love”), interprets it as emotional distance, and reacts by tearing up the fax. His immediate thought—being “glad he’d fucked Allison Manning” and vowing to continue—suggests he’s using physical intimacy as a coping mechanism for rejection. This reveals his vulnerability, pride, and a tendency to deflect emotional pain through control or retaliation, even as he outwardly focuses on Allison’s legal case.

    3. What logistical and security concerns arise for Allison Manning’s case, and how does Stone address them?

    Answer:
    With the press descending on St. Marks for Allison’s case, Stone anticipates privacy and security risks, particularly around her yacht. He enlists Thomas’s connections—two police sergeant brothers—to organize round-the-clock security (two officers at a time) at the marina. This proactive measure reflects Stone’s attention to Allison’s need for privacy amid media scrutiny and his reliance on local networks (Thomas’s family) to navigate challenges in St. Marks. The plan also hints at the growing public interest in the case, which could complicate legal proceedings.

    Answer:
    Paul Manning’s financial profile is double-edged for Allison’s case. On one hand, his wealth (via book contracts and assets) suggests Allison could access funds for her defense. However, his high leverage ($3.2 million in combined debt) and spending habits imply liquidity issues—he may not have readily available cash. The life insurance policy (hinted at by the Chubb inquiry) could be a motive if Allison is accused of his death, but Cantor finds no evidence of financial strife (e.g., late payments). This complicates theories of Allison’s guilt while leaving financial motives ambiguous.

    5. How does Thomas’s family background illustrate the socioeconomic context of St. Marks?

    Answer:
    Thomas’s description of his large family (six brothers, four sisters) reflects St. Marks’ pre-tourism era, where limited opportunities led to emigration or local careers like policing. His siblings’ paths—two sergeants, others returning after leaving—show how tourism later improved prosperity. The sisters’ traditional roles (“married and had babies”) contrast with Thomas’s entrepreneurial success, highlighting gendered divides. His network also underscores how familial ties function as social capital in St. Marks, enabling Stone to secure security through Thomas’s connections—a detail that emphasizes community interdependence on the island.

    Note