Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    The chap­ter opens with Stone Bar­ring­ton wak­ing up beside Alli­son Man­ning, his client, after a night of inti­ma­cy. Reflect­ing on their impul­sive con­nec­tion, Stone acknowl­edges his own vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties and Allison’s pos­si­ble motivations—whether dri­ven by fear of her impend­ing legal per­il or sim­ple desire. Their play­ful morn­ing is inter­rupt­ed by a knock from Hilary Kramer, a reporter from *The New York Times*, who has arrived unex­pect­ed­ly to inter­view Alli­son. Stone advis­es Alli­son to meet Kramer dis­creet­ly, and they arrange to talk at a near­by pub, where Stone plans to join them as her attor­ney.

    At the Shipwright’s Arms, Stone intro­duces him­self to Kramer, explain­ing his role in Allison’s case. Kramer reveals she flew in after hear­ing about the sto­ry on the AP wire. When Alli­son arrives, the reporter begins a thor­ough inter­view, prob­ing the details of Allison’s legal sit­u­a­tion. Stone strate­gi­cal­ly hints that media pres­sure could influ­ence the out­come, sub­tly urg­ing Kramer to inves­ti­gate fur­ther. He also alludes to poten­tial bias from Sir Win­ston Suther­land, St. Marks’ Min­is­ter of Jus­tice, spark­ing Kramer’s curios­i­ty.

    Kramer’s skep­ti­cism grows as Stone and Thomas, the pub own­er, encour­age her to con­front Suther­land direct­ly. Stone offers off-the-record insights into St. Marks’ flawed jus­tice sys­tem, leav­ing Kramer stunned. Real­iz­ing the story’s grav­i­ty, she decides to extend her stay, arrang­ing for a room and trans­porta­tion to Gov­ern­ment House. Thomas assists with logis­tics, while Kramer secures pho­tos of Alli­son and Stone for her arti­cle, plan­ning to con­tact Allison’s late husband’s agent for addi­tion­al mate­r­i­al.

    As Kramer departs to pur­sue the sto­ry, Alli­son ques­tions whether the inter­view went well. Stone reas­sures her, not­ing Kramer’s engage­ment but warn­ing they must main­tain a pro­fes­sion­al demeanor in pub­lic. Despite the ten­sion, their pri­vate con­nec­tion remains unde­ni­able, though Stone humor­ous­ly sug­gests abstain­ing from intimacy—a plan he quick­ly doubts they’ll fol­low. The chap­ter ends with a sense of cau­tious opti­mism as the media’s involve­ment could shift the legal bat­tle in Allison’s favor.

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the chapter establish the relationship dynamics between Stone and Allison?

      Answer:
      The chapter portrays a complex, intimate relationship between Stone and Allison, blending professional boundaries with personal attraction. Despite Allison being Stone’s client, their physical relationship develops due to a mix of emotional vulnerability (Allison’s potential mortality) and mutual desire (“maybe she was just horny”). Stone acknowledges the ethical gray area but rationalizes it due to distance from oversight bodies. Their playful, sexually charged banter (“Speaking of service…”) and mutual satisfaction highlight a connection beyond attorney-client relations, though Stone later recognizes the need for discretion around outsiders like Hilary Kramer.


      Answer:
      Stone views media coverage as pivotal to influencing public opinion and potentially swaying Allison’s case. He explicitly tells Hilary Kramer that press pressure could improve Allison’s chances, framing Sir Winston Sutherland’s actions as politically motivated (“an ax to grind”). By feeding Kramer off-the-record details about St. Marks’ flawed justice system, Stone aims to shape a narrative that paints Allison as a victim. His tactics include leveraging Kramer’s curiosity (“Why don’t you ask Sir Winston?”) and emphasizing urgency (“they could hang her as early as next week”) to provoke investigative reporting.


      3. Analyze the significance of the setting (e.g., the yacht, Shipwright’s Arms) in shaping the chapter’s tone and plot developments.

      Answer:
      The confined space of the yacht creates an intimate, isolated atmosphere that fuels Stone and Allison’s relationship, while also heightening tension when external forces (like Kramer) intrude. The Shipwright’s Arms serves as a transitional space where private conflicts become public: Kramer’s arrival forces Allison to switch from lover to interviewee, and Stone shifts from partner to legal representative. Thomas’s pub also acts as an information hub, facilitating plot advancements (e.g., offering transportation and lodging) and underscoring the clash between local culture and foreign media scrutiny.


      4. How does Hilary Kramer’s character serve as both an ally and a potential threat to Stone and Allison?

      Answer:
      Kramer is an ally insofar as her reporting could generate sympathy for Allison, but her sharp intuition (“woman’s intuition”) and investigative instincts pose risks. She immediately questions the legitimacy of the situation (“Is this some practical joke?”), signaling skepticism that could uncover inconsistencies in Stone’s or Allison’s accounts. Her demand for photos and quick adaptation to the island’s logistics (e.g., arranging Federal Express) demonstrate her professionalism, which Stone must carefully navigate—balancing transparency with secrecy to avoid undermining Allison’s legal position.


      5. Evaluate Stone’s ethical dilemma as an attorney in this chapter. What justifications does he provide, and how might his actions impact Allison’s case?

      Answer:
      Stone grapples with violating attorney-client boundaries by sleeping with Allison, rationalizing it through distance from oversight (“a long way from the Ethics Committee”) and personal weakness (“never been any good at saying no to women”). While this intimacy strengthens their alliance, it risks compromising his objectivity and could discredit both if exposed. His later insistence on appearing “very correct” around Kramer shows awareness of the stakes. If discovered, the relationship could undermine Allison’s credibility in court and paint Stone as exploitative, jeopardizing her defense.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Stone didn’t know what had motivated her to make love to him—maybe the realization that she might have no more than a week to live and the desire to make the most of it; or maybe she was just horny. For himself, he had been disappointed, angry, jealous, drunk, and, oh yes, horny.”

      This quote captures the raw, human complexity of the characters’ motivations—blending vulnerability, existential urgency, and dark humor. It reveals Stone’s self-awareness about his ethical boundaries (or lack thereof) as a lawyer and sets the tone for their fraught relationship.

      2. “‘I don’t know any other way to tell it,’ Allison replied.”

      A deceptively simple line that underscores Allison’s authenticity amid mounting legal and media scrutiny. It contrasts with the performative nature of the coming interview and hints at her psychological state facing potential execution.

      3. “‘Off the record, I think that will depend greatly on what the press has to say about this. If enough pressure can be brought to bear in the media, her chances will improve a lot.’”

      Stone’s blunt admission reveals the cynical reality of leveraging media influence in legal battles. This strategic insight exposes the intersection of justice and public perception in high-stakes cases.

      4. “‘I think it could hardly have gone better.’”

      Stone’s satisfied assessment of the reporter interview—juxtaposed with Allison’s earlier sexual remark—creates dramatic irony. The quote marks a turning point where media manipulation becomes their primary weapon against the island’s corrupt justice system.

      5. “‘We’d better be very correct everywhere, except in bed,’ Stone replied. ‘I’d suggest we give up sex for the duration, but I don’t th…’”

      This truncated confession perfectly encapsulates the chapter’s central tension: the collision of professional ethics, survival instincts, and human desire. The unfinished thought mirrors their unresolved predicament.

    Quotes

    1. “Stone didn’t know what had motivated her to make love to him—maybe the realization that she might have no more than a week to live and the desire to make the most of it; or maybe she was just horny. For himself, he had been disappointed, angry, jealous, drunk, and, oh yes, horny.”

    This quote captures the raw, human complexity of the characters’ motivations—blending vulnerability, existential urgency, and dark humor. It reveals Stone’s self-awareness about his ethical boundaries (or lack thereof) as a lawyer and sets the tone for their fraught relationship.

    2. “‘I don’t know any other way to tell it,’ Allison replied.”

    A deceptively simple line that underscores Allison’s authenticity amid mounting legal and media scrutiny. It contrasts with the performative nature of the coming interview and hints at her psychological state facing potential execution.

    3. “‘Off the record, I think that will depend greatly on what the press has to say about this. If enough pressure can be brought to bear in the media, her chances will improve a lot.’”

    Stone’s blunt admission reveals the cynical reality of leveraging media influence in legal battles. This strategic insight exposes the intersection of justice and public perception in high-stakes cases.

    4. “‘I think it could hardly have gone better.’”

    Stone’s satisfied assessment of the reporter interview—juxtaposed with Allison’s earlier sexual remark—creates dramatic irony. The quote marks a turning point where media manipulation becomes their primary weapon against the island’s corrupt justice system.

    5. “‘We’d better be very correct everywhere, except in bed,’ Stone replied. ‘I’d suggest we give up sex for the duration, but I don’t th…’”

    This truncated confession perfectly encapsulates the chapter’s central tension: the collision of professional ethics, survival instincts, and human desire. The unfinished thought mirrors their unresolved predicament.

    FAQs

    1. How does the chapter establish the relationship dynamics between Stone and Allison?

    Answer:
    The chapter portrays a complex, intimate relationship between Stone and Allison, blending professional boundaries with personal attraction. Despite Allison being Stone’s client, their physical relationship develops due to a mix of emotional vulnerability (Allison’s potential mortality) and mutual desire (“maybe she was just horny”). Stone acknowledges the ethical gray area but rationalizes it due to distance from oversight bodies. Their playful, sexually charged banter (“Speaking of service…”) and mutual satisfaction highlight a connection beyond attorney-client relations, though Stone later recognizes the need for discretion around outsiders like Hilary Kramer.


    Answer:
    Stone views media coverage as pivotal to influencing public opinion and potentially swaying Allison’s case. He explicitly tells Hilary Kramer that press pressure could improve Allison’s chances, framing Sir Winston Sutherland’s actions as politically motivated (“an ax to grind”). By feeding Kramer off-the-record details about St. Marks’ flawed justice system, Stone aims to shape a narrative that paints Allison as a victim. His tactics include leveraging Kramer’s curiosity (“Why don’t you ask Sir Winston?”) and emphasizing urgency (“they could hang her as early as next week”) to provoke investigative reporting.


    3. Analyze the significance of the setting (e.g., the yacht, Shipwright’s Arms) in shaping the chapter’s tone and plot developments.

    Answer:
    The confined space of the yacht creates an intimate, isolated atmosphere that fuels Stone and Allison’s relationship, while also heightening tension when external forces (like Kramer) intrude. The Shipwright’s Arms serves as a transitional space where private conflicts become public: Kramer’s arrival forces Allison to switch from lover to interviewee, and Stone shifts from partner to legal representative. Thomas’s pub also acts as an information hub, facilitating plot advancements (e.g., offering transportation and lodging) and underscoring the clash between local culture and foreign media scrutiny.


    4. How does Hilary Kramer’s character serve as both an ally and a potential threat to Stone and Allison?

    Answer:
    Kramer is an ally insofar as her reporting could generate sympathy for Allison, but her sharp intuition (“woman’s intuition”) and investigative instincts pose risks. She immediately questions the legitimacy of the situation (“Is this some practical joke?”), signaling skepticism that could uncover inconsistencies in Stone’s or Allison’s accounts. Her demand for photos and quick adaptation to the island’s logistics (e.g., arranging Federal Express) demonstrate her professionalism, which Stone must carefully navigate—balancing transparency with secrecy to avoid undermining Allison’s legal position.


    5. Evaluate Stone’s ethical dilemma as an attorney in this chapter. What justifications does he provide, and how might his actions impact Allison’s case?

    Answer:
    Stone grapples with violating attorney-client boundaries by sleeping with Allison, rationalizing it through distance from oversight (“a long way from the Ethics Committee”) and personal weakness (“never been any good at saying no to women”). While this intimacy strengthens their alliance, it risks compromising his objectivity and could discredit both if exposed. His later insistence on appearing “very correct” around Kramer shows awareness of the stakes. If discovered, the relationship could undermine Allison’s credibility in court and paint Stone as exploitative, jeopardizing her defense.

    Note