Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.
    PreviousNext
    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    Chapter 11

    by Stuart, Woods,

    In Chap­ter 11, Stone deliv­ers a blunt assess­ment of Alli­son Manning’s dire legal sit­u­a­tion. He explains that Sir Win­ston Suther­land, a polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed offi­cial, has orches­trat­ed an open ver­dict in the coroner’s jury, enabling mur­der charges against her. Stone warns that the tri­al is unavoid­able and could result in the death penal­ty, giv­en St. Marks’ swift and harsh judi­cial process. Alli­son, ini­tial­ly con­fi­dent in her inno­cence, grows alarmed as Stone details the rapid time­line: con­vic­tion, a 24-hour appeal win­dow, and exe­cu­tion with­in days. The grav­i­ty of her predica­ment sinks in, leav­ing her vis­i­bly shak­en and des­per­ate for solu­tions.

    Stone out­lines two poten­tial strate­gies to counter the charges. First, he empha­sizes mount­ing a strong legal defense, though he acknowl­edges lim­i­ta­tions, such as the judge’s refusal to allow an exter­nal bar­ris­ter. He reveals that an inves­ti­ga­tor is en route to the Canary Islands to gath­er evi­dence about Allison’s rela­tion­ship with her late hus­band, Paul. Sec­ond, Stone pro­pos­es lever­ag­ing inter­na­tion­al media pres­sure to under­mine Sir Winston’s polit­i­cal motives. By por­tray­ing Alli­son as a vic­tim of a cor­rupt sys­tem, they hope to sway pub­lic opin­ion and force the gov­ern­ment to recon­sid­er her case. Alli­son hes­i­tates, wary of the spot­light, but Stone insists it’s her only chance.

    The chap­ter delves into the logis­tics of the media cam­paign. Stone con­tacts Bill Eggers to hire a PR firm, aim­ing to flood glob­al news out­lets with Allison’s sto­ry. He envi­sions sen­sa­tion­al head­lines high­light­ing her plight as an inno­cent Amer­i­can tar­get­ed by a back­ward regime. Eggers agrees to mobi­lize resources, includ­ing engag­ing politi­cians and 60 Min­utes, to ampli­fy pres­sure on St. Marks. Stone stress­es urgency, giv­en the tight tri­al sched­ule, and cau­tions against reveal­ing dam­ag­ing infor­ma­tion about Alli­son or Paul. The plan hinges on por­tray­ing her sym­pa­thet­i­cal­ly to gar­ner inter­na­tion­al sup­port.

    Alli­son remains con­flict­ed but ulti­mate­ly con­sents to the PR strat­e­gy, rec­og­niz­ing the stakes. Stone arranges for her to trans­fer funds to cov­er the campaign’s costs, while also cau­tion­ing her about poten­tial com­pli­ca­tions with her insur­ance pay­out. The chap­ter ends with Stone and Eggers plot­ting to esca­late the media blitz, includ­ing involv­ing U.S. politi­cians and exag­ger­at­ing polit­i­cal ten­sions to gal­va­nize action. The tone is tense and prag­mat­ic, under­scor­ing the race against time to save Allison’s life through both legal and pub­lic rela­tions maneu­vers.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What are the two main strategies Stone proposes to defend Allison against the murder charge, and why does he believe each could be effective?

      Answer:
      Stone outlines two primary defense strategies. First, he plans to mount the best legal defense possible by gathering evidence from the Canary Islands about Allison’s relationship with Paul, though this is complicated by the judge restricting outside legal assistance. Second, and more unconventionally, he proposes a PR campaign to generate international media attention about Allison’s predicament. Stone believes this could pressure Sir Winston Sutherland by making her conviction politically damaging—since St. Marks relies on tourism, negative global publicity about unjust trials could harm the island’s economy and Sutherland’s political ambitions. The campaign aims to portray Allison as an innocent American victimized by a corrupt system (e.g., through headlines like “BEAUTIFUL BLOND AMERICAN GIRL LOSES HUSBAND AT SEA!”).

      Answer:
      The St. Marks legal system is depicted as highly expedited and politically influenced. Key differences include: (1) The trial is exceptionally fast—lasting only 1–2 days—with no option for prolonged legal challenges. (2) The appeal process is minimal: Allison would have only 24 hours to file an appeal after conviction, and the prime minister would decide within another 24 hours. (3) The death penalty is mandatory for capital offenses, with execution scheduled the day after a denied appeal. (4) Jury selection is controlled by the judge, raising concerns about bias, as Stone notes the panel may be “all or mostly black” and potentially prejudiced against Allison as a white defendant. These contrasts highlight the lack of procedural safeguards common in Western systems.

      3. Why does Allison hesitate about the PR campaign strategy, and how does Stone counter her objections?

      Answer:
      Allison resists the PR campaign because she values her privacy, stating, “I’m really a very private person.” She also doubts its efficacy, asking, “I just don’t see how that’s going to help.” Stone forcefully rebuts her by framing the situation as life-or-death: “If we don’t do something, you’re going to be a very dead private person.” He argues that Sir Winston cannot control international opinion, and negative media coverage would threaten St. Marks’ tourism-dependent economy, thereby pressuring officials to avoid her conviction. His pragmatic approach prioritizes survival over privacy, emphasizing that the campaign could “make it politically undesirable” to convict her.

      4. Analyze the power dynamics at play in this chapter, focusing on Sir Winston Sutherland’s motivations and Stone’s attempts to counter them.

      Answer:
      Sir Winston Sutherland wields significant political and legal power, using the justice system to target Allison for perceived political gain. Stone’s dialogue suggests Sutherland engineered the coroner’s “open verdict” to justify the murder charge, implying corruption. Stone’s counter-strategies aim to shift power dynamics: (1) Legally, he seeks external evidence to challenge the charges, but Sutherland’s influence limits this (e.g., barring outside lawyers). (2) Politically, Stone exploits Sutherland’s vulnerability to international scrutiny by mobilizing media and diplomatic pressure (e.g., involving U.S. senators and 60 Minutes). The chapter underscores how legal systems can be weaponized for political ends and how public opinion may serve as a check.

      5. What ethical dilemmas arise from Stone’s plan to manipulate media narratives, and how might this impact Allison’s case?

      Answer:
      Stone’s media strategy raises ethical questions about truth manipulation. He instructs Bill Eggers to omit unfavorable information about Allison or Paul, crafting a one-sided narrative of her as an innocent victim. While this could save her life by garnering sympathy, it risks distorting facts and fueling sensationalism (e.g., the proposed headline’s dramatic language). The plan also exploits stereotypes (“Barbaric islanders persecuting American blonde”), potentially oversimplifying complex legal and cultural realities. However, given the urgency and systemic bias against Allison, Stone may view this as a necessary tactic to counteract Sutherland’s own manipulation of the legal process.

    Quotes

    • This quote establishes the central conflict of the chapter, revealing how political manipulation has put Allison in grave legal jeopardy. It introduces the antagonist’s motives and sets up the unjust nature of the charges against her.

      2. “Allison, let me put this to you as strongly as I can. If we don’t do something you’re going to be a very dead private person.”

      This blunt statement captures the life-or-death stakes of the situation and Stone’s urgent tone. It marks a turning point where Allison must choose between her desire for privacy and survival.

      3. “BEAUTIFUL BLOND AMERICAN GIRL LOSES HUSBAND AT SEA! CONNIVING POLITICIAN CHARGES HER WITH MURDER IN BACK-WATER ISLAND NATION!!!”

      This hypothetical headline represents Stone’s strategy to weaponize media attention against the corrupt legal system. It illustrates how public perception might be leveraged as Allison’s only viable defense.

      4. “If you try that and they catch you, it’s tantamount to conviction; they could hang you before the week is out.”

      This quote emphasizes the terrifying speed and finality of St. Marks’ justice system. It shows how completely trapped Allison is, with even attempted escape carrying immediate deadly consequences.

      5. “Call Bob Cantor…Try to be careful what you release to the PR people; don’t let anything unfavorable get into the mix.”

      This instruction reveals the calculated nature of the media strategy, showing how Stone plans to carefully craft Allison’s public image while investigating her husband’s background.

    Quotes

    This quote establishes the central conflict of the chapter, revealing how political manipulation has put Allison in grave legal jeopardy. It introduces the antagonist’s motives and sets up the unjust nature of the charges against her.

    2. “Allison, let me put this to you as strongly as I can. If we don’t do something you’re going to be a very dead private person.”

    This blunt statement captures the life-or-death stakes of the situation and Stone’s urgent tone. It marks a turning point where Allison must choose between her desire for privacy and survival.

    3. “BEAUTIFUL BLOND AMERICAN GIRL LOSES HUSBAND AT SEA! CONNIVING POLITICIAN CHARGES HER WITH MURDER IN BACK-WATER ISLAND NATION!!!”

    This hypothetical headline represents Stone’s strategy to weaponize media attention against the corrupt legal system. It illustrates how public perception might be leveraged as Allison’s only viable defense.

    4. “If you try that and they catch you, it’s tantamount to conviction; they could hang you before the week is out.”

    This quote emphasizes the terrifying speed and finality of St. Marks’ justice system. It shows how completely trapped Allison is, with even attempted escape carrying immediate deadly consequences.

    5. “Call Bob Cantor…Try to be careful what you release to the PR people; don’t let anything unfavorable get into the mix.”

    This instruction reveals the calculated nature of the media strategy, showing how Stone plans to carefully craft Allison’s public image while investigating her husband’s background.

    FAQs

    1. What are the two main strategies Stone proposes to defend Allison against the murder charge, and why does he believe each could be effective?

    Answer:
    Stone outlines two primary defense strategies. First, he plans to mount the best legal defense possible by gathering evidence from the Canary Islands about Allison’s relationship with Paul, though this is complicated by the judge restricting outside legal assistance. Second, and more unconventionally, he proposes a PR campaign to generate international media attention about Allison’s predicament. Stone believes this could pressure Sir Winston Sutherland by making her conviction politically damaging—since St. Marks relies on tourism, negative global publicity about unjust trials could harm the island’s economy and Sutherland’s political ambitions. The campaign aims to portray Allison as an innocent American victimized by a corrupt system (e.g., through headlines like “BEAUTIFUL BLOND AMERICAN GIRL LOSES HUSBAND AT SEA!”).

    Answer:
    The St. Marks legal system is depicted as highly expedited and politically influenced. Key differences include: (1) The trial is exceptionally fast—lasting only 1–2 days—with no option for prolonged legal challenges. (2) The appeal process is minimal: Allison would have only 24 hours to file an appeal after conviction, and the prime minister would decide within another 24 hours. (3) The death penalty is mandatory for capital offenses, with execution scheduled the day after a denied appeal. (4) Jury selection is controlled by the judge, raising concerns about bias, as Stone notes the panel may be “all or mostly black” and potentially prejudiced against Allison as a white defendant. These contrasts highlight the lack of procedural safeguards common in Western systems.

    3. Why does Allison hesitate about the PR campaign strategy, and how does Stone counter her objections?

    Answer:
    Allison resists the PR campaign because she values her privacy, stating, “I’m really a very private person.” She also doubts its efficacy, asking, “I just don’t see how that’s going to help.” Stone forcefully rebuts her by framing the situation as life-or-death: “If we don’t do something, you’re going to be a very dead private person.” He argues that Sir Winston cannot control international opinion, and negative media coverage would threaten St. Marks’ tourism-dependent economy, thereby pressuring officials to avoid her conviction. His pragmatic approach prioritizes survival over privacy, emphasizing that the campaign could “make it politically undesirable” to convict her.

    4. Analyze the power dynamics at play in this chapter, focusing on Sir Winston Sutherland’s motivations and Stone’s attempts to counter them.

    Answer:
    Sir Winston Sutherland wields significant political and legal power, using the justice system to target Allison for perceived political gain. Stone’s dialogue suggests Sutherland engineered the coroner’s “open verdict” to justify the murder charge, implying corruption. Stone’s counter-strategies aim to shift power dynamics: (1) Legally, he seeks external evidence to challenge the charges, but Sutherland’s influence limits this (e.g., barring outside lawyers). (2) Politically, Stone exploits Sutherland’s vulnerability to international scrutiny by mobilizing media and diplomatic pressure (e.g., involving U.S. senators and 60 Minutes). The chapter underscores how legal systems can be weaponized for political ends and how public opinion may serve as a check.

    5. What ethical dilemmas arise from Stone’s plan to manipulate media narratives, and how might this impact Allison’s case?

    Answer:
    Stone’s media strategy raises ethical questions about truth manipulation. He instructs Bill Eggers to omit unfavorable information about Allison or Paul, crafting a one-sided narrative of her as an innocent victim. While this could save her life by garnering sympathy, it risks distorting facts and fueling sensationalism (e.g., the proposed headline’s dramatic language). The plan also exploits stereotypes (“Barbaric islanders persecuting American blonde”), potentially oversimplifying complex legal and cultural realities. However, given the urgency and systemic bias against Allison, Stone may view this as a necessary tactic to counteract Sutherland’s own manipulation of the legal process.

    Note