Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.
    PreviousNext
    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    Chapter 4

    by Stuart, Woods,

    In Chap­ter 4, Stone Bar­ring­ton and Alli­son Man­ning retreat to her lux­u­ri­ous yacht to dis­cuss the ongo­ing coroner’s inquest into her husband’s death. Over sand­wich­es, Stone explains the three pos­si­ble ver­dicts: nat­ur­al caus­es, homi­cide, or an open ver­dict. He warns that a homi­cide rul­ing could lead to mur­der charges against Alli­son, though she vehe­ment­ly denies any involve­ment. Stone advis­es her to seek a recess to pre­pare her defense, but Alli­son, eager to return home, resists the idea, con­fi­dent the jury will believe her account of her husband’s nat­ur­al death.

    Stone empha­sizes the risks of rush­ing the legal process, espe­cial­ly giv­en Sir Win­ston Sutherland’s role as the island’s jus­tice min­is­ter and his polit­i­cal ambi­tions. Alli­son remains defi­ant, dis­miss­ing con­cerns about her husband’s diary as evi­dence. Stone probes fur­ther, ask­ing if the police took addi­tion­al items from the yacht, but Alli­son insists only the log­book and diary were removed. With lim­it­ed time, they focus on build­ing her case, though Stone remains cau­tious about Sir Winston’s poten­tial to sway the jury with con­trary evi­dence.

    Dur­ing a brief pause, Stone admires the yacht’s opu­lent design, not­ing its high-end crafts­man­ship and equip­ment, which hint at the couple’s wealth. Alli­son reap­pears, refreshed and ready to return to the inquest. As they head back, the ten­sion mounts, with Stone car­ry­ing doc­u­ments Alli­son pro­vid­ed, though the chap­ter leaves their strat­e­gy unre­solved. The scene under­scores the pre­car­i­ous­ness of Allison’s posi­tion and Stone’s role as her reluc­tant advo­cate.

    The chap­ter con­cludes with Stone and Alli­son reen­ter­ing the Mark­stown meet­ing hall, where Sir Win­ston resumes his ques­tion­ing. The unre­solved ten­sion high­lights the stakes of the inquest and Allison’s deter­mi­na­tion to clear her name quick­ly, despite Stone’s warn­ings. The inter­play between legal strat­e­gy, per­son­al urgency, and polit­i­cal under­cur­rents sets the stage for the next phase of the pro­ceed­ings, leav­ing read­ers antic­i­pat­ing the out­come of Sir Winston’s scruti­ny.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. What are the three possible verdicts the jury could return in the coroner’s inquest regarding Paul Manning’s death, and what are the implications of each?

      Answer:
      The three possible verdicts are: (1) death from natural causes, which would allow Allison to receive a death certificate and move forward with her life; (2) death by homicide, which would likely lead to murder charges against Allison, forcing her to stand trial or plead to a lesser charge; and (3) an open verdict, meaning the jury lacks sufficient evidence to determine the cause of death, which might still allow Allison to proceed but leaves uncertainty. Stone emphasizes that a homicide verdict would be particularly dangerous, as Sir Winston could use it for political gain, potentially pressuring Allison into a difficult legal position.

      2. Why does Stone recommend requesting a recess in the inquest, and how does Allison respond to this suggestion?

      Answer:
      Stone advises requesting a recess to allow Allison more time to prepare her defense and secure a local lawyer, as he believes Sir Winston may present damaging evidence. He argues that rushing the legal process without proper preparation could weaken her position. However, Allison strongly opposes this idea, expressing her desire to leave St. Marks quickly to settle her husband’s estate and resume her life. She prefers to proceed with the inquest immediately, relying on her own testimony and Stone’s representation, despite the risks.

      3. How does the description of Allison’s yacht contribute to the story, and what might it imply about her character or circumstances?

      Answer:
      The detailed description of the yacht—a high-end Swan model built without regard to cost—suggests significant wealth and luxury. This could imply that Allison and her husband led an affluent lifestyle, potentially raising questions about motives or financial stakes in Paul’s death. Additionally, the yacht’s opulence contrasts with the dire legal situation Allison faces, highlighting the disparity between her privileged life and the current crisis. Stone’s observation of the yacht’s value might also hint at underlying themes of money, power, and hidden tensions in the narrative.

      4. What strategic concerns does Stone raise about Sir Winston’s role in the inquest, and why could he pose a threat to Allison?

      Answer:
      Stone identifies Sir Winston as the minister of justice with political ambitions, possibly aiming to become prime minister. This makes him a threat because he might pursue a homicide verdict against Allison to bolster his reputation or gain public support. Stone warns that Sir Winston could exploit the case for political advantage, using any evidence (like Paul’s diary) to cast suspicion on Allison. This adds a layer of complexity to the legal proceedings, as the inquest may not be purely about justice but also about Sir Winston’s career aspirations.

      5. How does Allison’s reaction to the possibility of a murder charge reveal her personality and mindset?

      Answer:
      Allison’s immediate denial (“I didn’t murder Paul!”) and refusal to plead to any charge demonstrate her strong-willed, defiant nature. She is confident in her innocence and unwilling to compromise, even when faced with severe consequences. Her insistence on resolving the inquest quickly further shows her impatience and desire to regain control of her life. However, her dismissal of potential evidence (like the diary) as “no problem” may also indicate overconfidence or a lack of awareness about the gravity of her situation, which could become a vulnerability later.

    Quotes

    • 1. “If the verdict is death by homicide, then Sir Winston is going to be very nearly obliged to bring a charge of murder against you.”

      This quote captures the high-stakes legal dilemma Allison faces, revealing how the inquest’s outcome could dramatically alter her life. It introduces the central conflict of the chapter - the possibility of murder charges.

      2. “I have no intention of pleading to any charge.”

      Allison’s defiant statement shows her determination and establishes her position in the legal battle. This quote is significant as it reveals her character’s resolve and sets up the tension between her desires and legal realities.

      Stone’s professional assessment provides crucial legal advice while subtly warning about the weakness of Allison’s case. This represents the chapter’s key argument about legal strategy.

      4. “If that’s true, and if he sees some political advantage in pursuing this, he could be dangerous to your interests.”

      This quote reveals the political dimension of the legal proceedings, showing how personal justice might be influenced by Sir Winston’s ambitions. It expands the conflict beyond just legal technicalities.

      5. “I can’t believe he could possibly convince a jury that Paul’s death was anything other than natural. After all, there were no witnesses; they’d have to take my word, wouldn’t they?”

      Allison’s naive assumption about legal proceedings contrasts with Stone’s professional perspective, highlighting the chapter’s theme of legal reality versus personal belief.

    Quotes

    1. “If the verdict is death by homicide, then Sir Winston is going to be very nearly obliged to bring a charge of murder against you.”

    This quote captures the high-stakes legal dilemma Allison faces, revealing how the inquest’s outcome could dramatically alter her life. It introduces the central conflict of the chapter - the possibility of murder charges.

    2. “I have no intention of pleading to any charge.”

    Allison’s defiant statement shows her determination and establishes her position in the legal battle. This quote is significant as it reveals her character’s resolve and sets up the tension between her desires and legal realities.

    Stone’s professional assessment provides crucial legal advice while subtly warning about the weakness of Allison’s case. This represents the chapter’s key argument about legal strategy.

    4. “If that’s true, and if he sees some political advantage in pursuing this, he could be dangerous to your interests.”

    This quote reveals the political dimension of the legal proceedings, showing how personal justice might be influenced by Sir Winston’s ambitions. It expands the conflict beyond just legal technicalities.

    5. “I can’t believe he could possibly convince a jury that Paul’s death was anything other than natural. After all, there were no witnesses; they’d have to take my word, wouldn’t they?”

    Allison’s naive assumption about legal proceedings contrasts with Stone’s professional perspective, highlighting the chapter’s theme of legal reality versus personal belief.

    FAQs

    1. What are the three possible verdicts the jury could return in the coroner’s inquest regarding Paul Manning’s death, and what are the implications of each?

    Answer:
    The three possible verdicts are: (1) death from natural causes, which would allow Allison to receive a death certificate and move forward with her life; (2) death by homicide, which would likely lead to murder charges against Allison, forcing her to stand trial or plead to a lesser charge; and (3) an open verdict, meaning the jury lacks sufficient evidence to determine the cause of death, which might still allow Allison to proceed but leaves uncertainty. Stone emphasizes that a homicide verdict would be particularly dangerous, as Sir Winston could use it for political gain, potentially pressuring Allison into a difficult legal position.

    2. Why does Stone recommend requesting a recess in the inquest, and how does Allison respond to this suggestion?

    Answer:
    Stone advises requesting a recess to allow Allison more time to prepare her defense and secure a local lawyer, as he believes Sir Winston may present damaging evidence. He argues that rushing the legal process without proper preparation could weaken her position. However, Allison strongly opposes this idea, expressing her desire to leave St. Marks quickly to settle her husband’s estate and resume her life. She prefers to proceed with the inquest immediately, relying on her own testimony and Stone’s representation, despite the risks.

    3. How does the description of Allison’s yacht contribute to the story, and what might it imply about her character or circumstances?

    Answer:
    The detailed description of the yacht—a high-end Swan model built without regard to cost—suggests significant wealth and luxury. This could imply that Allison and her husband led an affluent lifestyle, potentially raising questions about motives or financial stakes in Paul’s death. Additionally, the yacht’s opulence contrasts with the dire legal situation Allison faces, highlighting the disparity between her privileged life and the current crisis. Stone’s observation of the yacht’s value might also hint at underlying themes of money, power, and hidden tensions in the narrative.

    4. What strategic concerns does Stone raise about Sir Winston’s role in the inquest, and why could he pose a threat to Allison?

    Answer:
    Stone identifies Sir Winston as the minister of justice with political ambitions, possibly aiming to become prime minister. This makes him a threat because he might pursue a homicide verdict against Allison to bolster his reputation or gain public support. Stone warns that Sir Winston could exploit the case for political advantage, using any evidence (like Paul’s diary) to cast suspicion on Allison. This adds a layer of complexity to the legal proceedings, as the inquest may not be purely about justice but also about Sir Winston’s career aspirations.

    5. How does Allison’s reaction to the possibility of a murder charge reveal her personality and mindset?

    Answer:
    Allison’s immediate denial (“I didn’t murder Paul!”) and refusal to plead to any charge demonstrate her strong-willed, defiant nature. She is confident in her innocence and unwilling to compromise, even when faced with severe consequences. Her insistence on resolving the inquest quickly further shows her impatience and desire to regain control of her life. However, her dismissal of potential evidence (like the diary) as “no problem” may also indicate overconfidence or a lack of awareness about the gravity of her situation, which could become a vulnerability later.

    Note