Cover of [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water
    Adventure FictionFictionThriller

    [Stone Barrington 03] • Dead in the Water

    by Stuart, Woods,
    In “Dead in the Water,” part of Stuart Woods’ Stone Barrington series, the suave attorney and former NYPD detective finds himself embroiled in a high-stakes legal thriller. While vacationing in the Caribbean, Barrington is drawn into a case involving a wealthy woman accused of murdering her husband at sea. As he investigates, he uncovers layers of deception, maritime law complexities, and dangerous adversaries. The novel blends legal intrigue with action, showcasing Barrington’s wit and resourcefulness. Themes of justice, trust, and survival underpin this fast-paced entry in the popular series, appealing to fans of courtroom dramas and adventure alike.

    The chap­ter opens with Stone arriv­ing at the Mark­stown Meet­ing Hall for the coroner’s inquest into the death of Paul Phillips Man­ning. The set­ting is infor­mal, with a jury of six men and the coro­ner seat­ed at a card table. Alli­son Man­ning, the deceased’s wife, is present in a black dress, exud­ing a qui­et dig­ni­ty. Sir Win­ston Suther­land, dressed for­mal­ly, over­sees the pro­ceed­ings. The coro­ner calls the inquest to order, and Alli­son is sworn in to tes­ti­fy. Stone observes her com­posed demeanor, won­der­ing if she under­stands the grav­i­ty of the sit­u­a­tion. The scene is set for a detailed recount­ing of the events lead­ing to Paul’s death.

    Alli­son Man­ning begins her tes­ti­mo­ny by pro­vid­ing back­ground on her mar­riage and their life in Green­wich, Con­necti­cut. She describes their exten­sive sail­ing jour­ney, start­ing from New­port, Rhode Island, to var­i­ous Euro­pean and Mediter­ranean des­ti­na­tions, before head­ing toward Antigua. Her nar­ra­tive is pre­cise, detail­ing their route and the tech­ni­cal aspects of their yacht. The jour­ney was marked by adven­ture until the fate­ful inci­dent ten days out of Puer­to Rico. Allison’s account sets the stage for the trag­ic event, empha­siz­ing their shared pas­sion for sail­ing and the rou­tine nature of their voy­age before things took a turn.

    The crux of Allison’s tes­ti­mo­ny revolves around the inci­dent at sea. She explains how a mal­func­tion in the roller-reef­ing gear required some­one to climb the mast. Despite Paul’s ill­ness, she vol­un­teered, as he was too unwell to go him­self. While she was at the mast’s top, Paul col­lapsed, show­ing signs of a heart attack. Alli­son, strand­ed and ter­ri­fied, watched help­less­ly as he lost con­scious­ness. Her emo­tion­al recount­ing high­lights her des­per­a­tion and the bru­tal real­i­ty of being unable to assist her hus­band. The jury lis­tens intent­ly as she describes the har­row­ing hours she spent cling­ing to the mast before mus­ter­ing the courage to descend.

    Alli­son con­cludes her tes­ti­mo­ny by recount­ing her per­ilous descent from the mast and her sub­se­quent col­lapse from exhaus­tion. She admits to faint­ing before final­ly check­ing on Paul, who was by then unre­spon­sive. Her nar­ra­tive paints a vivid pic­ture of iso­la­tion and trau­ma, under­scor­ing the help­less­ness she felt dur­ing the ordeal. The chap­ter ends with her poised yet emo­tion­al­ly raw deliv­ery, leav­ing the inquest—and the reader—awaiting fur­ther details. The tes­ti­mo­ny sets the foun­da­tion for the legal and emo­tion­al com­plex­i­ties that will unfold in the sub­se­quent pro­ceed­ings.

    FAQs

    • 1. What were the key details of the incident at sea that led to Paul Manning’s death, as described by Allison Manning?

      Answer:
      Allison Manning recounted that during their voyage, the roller-reefing gear on their yacht malfunctioned, requiring someone to climb the mast to fix it. Despite Paul Manning feeling unwell, Allison volunteered to go up due to his insistence on maintaining their sailing schedule. While she was at the top of the mast, she noticed Paul clutching his left arm and collapsing, appearing to suffer a heart attack. With the boat rolling violently and no sails up, she was stranded for hours before managing to descend. By the time she reached the deck, Paul was unconscious and unresponsive, lying facedown in the cockpit. The incident highlights the dangers of sailing shorthanded and the tragic consequences of Paul’s refusal to delay repairs until he felt better.

      2. How does the setting and atmosphere of the coroner’s inquest contribute to the tone of the chapter?

      Answer:
      The inquest takes place in a modest Markstown Meeting Hall, with folding chairs and a card table, evoking a sense of informality that contrasts with the gravity of the proceedings. The jury composition (five Black men and one white) and the presence of Sir Winston Sutherland, dressed officiously, add layers of social and political context. The scene is described as resembling a “high school play set in a courtroom,” underscoring its makeshift nature. This setting creates a tone of solemnity mixed with unease, as Allison Manning’s emotional testimony unfolds in a space that feels both intimate and inadequate for the weight of her story. The juxtaposition of the humble surroundings and the high-stakes inquiry amplifies the tension.

      3. Analyze Allison Manning’s demeanor during her testimony. What might it suggest about her character or her relationship with her late husband?

      Answer:
      Allison Manning is portrayed as composed yet vulnerable—her “clear, well-modulated voice” and serene stare at the coroner suggest poise, but her voice quavers and she cries when describing Paul’s collapse. Her detailed recollection of their voyage and the incident demonstrates her involvement in their sailing life, while her insistence on climbing the mast despite the risks hints at loyalty or a desire to prove herself. However, her choice of a “not quite demure” black dress and her exhaustion-radiant appearance could symbolize conflicting emotions: grief mixed with relief or liberation. Her testimony paints a complex picture of a woman who was an active partner in their adventures but may have harbored unresolved feelings about their dynamic.

      4. What role does Sir Winston Sutherland play in the inquest, and how might his presence influence the proceedings?

      Answer:
      Sir Winston Sutherland serves as the questioner, introduced as an authoritative figure in a “double-breasted blue suit with chalk stripes.” His height (6’3”) and gentle yet methodical questioning style command respect. By expressing condolences and guiding Allison through her testimony, he appears impartial, but his official role suggests he may represent broader institutional interests. His presence likely formalizes the inquest, ensuring a structured inquiry, but his political stature (evidenced by his title) could also imply that the case has significance beyond a routine investigation. His interactions with the jury and careful phrasing (“Do you understand?”) reveal an effort to maintain clarity and control over the narrative.

      5. How does the author use nautical terminology and Allison’s technical description of the sailing incident to enhance the story’s realism?

      Answer:
      The detailed account of the roller-reefing gear malfunction—terms like “bosun’s chair,” “halyard,” and “crosstrees”—grounds the tragedy in authentic sailing expertise. Allison’s explanation of the gear separating and her precarious position at the masthead immerses readers in the chaos of the moment. This specificity not only verifies her credibility as a sailor but also heightens the horror of her helplessness during Paul’s medical crisis. The jargon contrasts with her emotional breakdown, emphasizing the stark shift from routine seamanship to life-or-death struggle. Such precision makes the incident more visceral and underscores the couple’s shared passion, which ultimately frames the irony of Paul’s death occurring during a mundane repair.

    Quotes

    • 1. “The dress was not quite demure enough for mourning, but it bespoke a certain dignity.”

      This description of Allison Manning’s attire subtly introduces her complex character—showing both her nonconformity and her poise during the inquest, setting the tone for her testimony.

      2. “I was very frightened. The wind began to get up again, and with no sail up, the boat was rolling very badly. I continued to call out to him in panic—panic that I was stuck at the top of the mast, and panic that he seemed to be having a heart attack, and I couldn’t help him.”

      This visceral account captures the pivotal moment of crisis at sea, illustrating Allison’s helplessness during her husband’s medical emergency while trapped aloft—a key emotional turning point in her testimony.

      3. “I just clung to the mast and cried… A long time. Two hours, maybe three. I wasn’t wearing a watch.”

      This stark admission reveals the raw trauma of Allison’s experience, emphasizing both the duration of her ordeal and her disorientation—critical for understanding her subsequent actions and state of mind.

      4. “I still don’t know why I didn’t fall and hurt myself.”

      This reflective remark underscores the miraculous nature of Allison’s survival, adding an element of uncertainty that lingers over her entire account of the incident.

    Quotes

    1. “The dress was not quite demure enough for mourning, but it bespoke a certain dignity.”

    This description of Allison Manning’s attire subtly introduces her complex character—showing both her nonconformity and her poise during the inquest, setting the tone for her testimony.

    2. “I was very frightened. The wind began to get up again, and with no sail up, the boat was rolling very badly. I continued to call out to him in panic—panic that I was stuck at the top of the mast, and panic that he seemed to be having a heart attack, and I couldn’t help him.”

    This visceral account captures the pivotal moment of crisis at sea, illustrating Allison’s helplessness during her husband’s medical emergency while trapped aloft—a key emotional turning point in her testimony.

    3. “I just clung to the mast and cried… A long time. Two hours, maybe three. I wasn’t wearing a watch.”

    This stark admission reveals the raw trauma of Allison’s experience, emphasizing both the duration of her ordeal and her disorientation—critical for understanding her subsequent actions and state of mind.

    4. “I still don’t know why I didn’t fall and hurt myself.”

    This reflective remark underscores the miraculous nature of Allison’s survival, adding an element of uncertainty that lingers over her entire account of the incident.

    FAQs

    1. What were the key details of the incident at sea that led to Paul Manning’s death, as described by Allison Manning?

    Answer:
    Allison Manning recounted that during their voyage, the roller-reefing gear on their yacht malfunctioned, requiring someone to climb the mast to fix it. Despite Paul Manning feeling unwell, Allison volunteered to go up due to his insistence on maintaining their sailing schedule. While she was at the top of the mast, she noticed Paul clutching his left arm and collapsing, appearing to suffer a heart attack. With the boat rolling violently and no sails up, she was stranded for hours before managing to descend. By the time she reached the deck, Paul was unconscious and unresponsive, lying facedown in the cockpit. The incident highlights the dangers of sailing shorthanded and the tragic consequences of Paul’s refusal to delay repairs until he felt better.

    2. How does the setting and atmosphere of the coroner’s inquest contribute to the tone of the chapter?

    Answer:
    The inquest takes place in a modest Markstown Meeting Hall, with folding chairs and a card table, evoking a sense of informality that contrasts with the gravity of the proceedings. The jury composition (five Black men and one white) and the presence of Sir Winston Sutherland, dressed officiously, add layers of social and political context. The scene is described as resembling a “high school play set in a courtroom,” underscoring its makeshift nature. This setting creates a tone of solemnity mixed with unease, as Allison Manning’s emotional testimony unfolds in a space that feels both intimate and inadequate for the weight of her story. The juxtaposition of the humble surroundings and the high-stakes inquiry amplifies the tension.

    3. Analyze Allison Manning’s demeanor during her testimony. What might it suggest about her character or her relationship with her late husband?

    Answer:
    Allison Manning is portrayed as composed yet vulnerable—her “clear, well-modulated voice” and serene stare at the coroner suggest poise, but her voice quavers and she cries when describing Paul’s collapse. Her detailed recollection of their voyage and the incident demonstrates her involvement in their sailing life, while her insistence on climbing the mast despite the risks hints at loyalty or a desire to prove herself. However, her choice of a “not quite demure” black dress and her exhaustion-radiant appearance could symbolize conflicting emotions: grief mixed with relief or liberation. Her testimony paints a complex picture of a woman who was an active partner in their adventures but may have harbored unresolved feelings about their dynamic.

    4. What role does Sir Winston Sutherland play in the inquest, and how might his presence influence the proceedings?

    Answer:
    Sir Winston Sutherland serves as the questioner, introduced as an authoritative figure in a “double-breasted blue suit with chalk stripes.” His height (6’3”) and gentle yet methodical questioning style command respect. By expressing condolences and guiding Allison through her testimony, he appears impartial, but his official role suggests he may represent broader institutional interests. His presence likely formalizes the inquest, ensuring a structured inquiry, but his political stature (evidenced by his title) could also imply that the case has significance beyond a routine investigation. His interactions with the jury and careful phrasing (“Do you understand?”) reveal an effort to maintain clarity and control over the narrative.

    5. How does the author use nautical terminology and Allison’s technical description of the sailing incident to enhance the story’s realism?

    Answer:
    The detailed account of the roller-reefing gear malfunction—terms like “bosun’s chair,” “halyard,” and “crosstrees”—grounds the tragedy in authentic sailing expertise. Allison’s explanation of the gear separating and her precarious position at the masthead immerses readers in the chaos of the moment. This specificity not only verifies her credibility as a sailor but also heightens the horror of her helplessness during Paul’s medical crisis. The jargon contrasts with her emotional breakdown, emphasizing the stark shift from routine seamanship to life-or-death struggle. Such precision makes the incident more visceral and underscores the couple’s shared passion, which ultimately frames the irony of Paul’s death occurring during a mundane repair.

    Note