
Buried Prey
Chapter 15
by Sandford, JohnMarcy Sherrill, aware of the growing media frenzy around the Jones case, reflects on Lucas Davenport’s relentless approach to the investigation. Davenport, driven by personal stakes, is leveraging the media to pressure the Minneapolis PD into uncovering more about the suspect, John Fell. Despite the department’s overall decline in crime rates, Sherrill acknowledges Davenport’s tendency to manipulate the press, a tactic he employed even during his time as a Minneapolis cop. She anticipates the chief’s inevitable inquiry about Kelly Barker, whose televised interviews have amplified public attention on the case.
Sherrill and her colleague Buster Hill prepare to interview Barker, primarily for public relations purposes. As they drive to Barker’s Bloomington home, Sherrill muses about Davenport’s charisma and their past brief affair, contrasting it with his unwavering loyalty to his wife, Weather. She also contemplates her current relationship with Rick, an investment advisor, and other potential romantic interests, including an artist and a cowboy-boot-wearing surgeon. These reflections reveal her restlessness and desire for companionship, even as she acknowledges the impracticality of some relationships.
Meanwhile, the killer, a deeply troubled and angry man, stalks Barker’s neighborhood, fueled by rage and a sense of hopelessness. He resents his miserable existence and fixates on Barker as the sole witness who can identify him. After surveilling her house, he devises a plan to attack, disguising himself with a fake beard and arming himself. His internal monologue underscores his desperation and violent intent, setting the stage for a potential confrontation.
The chapter juxtaposes Sherrill’s professional and personal musings with the killer’s escalating menace. While Sherrill navigates the complexities of her relationships and the demands of the case, the killer’s lurking presence adds tension, hinting at an impending clash. The narrative balances introspection with suspense, highlighting the parallel trajectories of law enforcement and criminal intent.
FAQs
1. How does Marcy Sherrill view Lucas Davenport’s involvement in the Jones case, and what concerns does she have about his methods?
Answer:
Marcy Sherrill recognizes Davenport’s personal stake in the Jones case and acknowledges his relentless approach, comparing it to “Sherman’s March on Atlanta.” While she understands his motivations, she finds his media manipulation tactics annoying, as they pressure the Minneapolis PD to prioritize the John Fell investigation. Sherrill notes that Davenport has historically used the media effectively, both as a Minneapolis cop and with the BCA, but she anticipates backlash from her chief about Kelly Barker’s high-profile TV appearances. Her mixed feelings reflect both professional frustration and personal fondness for Davenport, given their past relationship.2. What social and criminal trends does Sherrill observe in Minneapolis, and how does she connect them to drug use patterns?
Answer:
Sherrill notes positive trends: declining murder, rape, and armed robbery rates, along with fading gang activity. She attributes part of this improvement to reduced cocaine and meth sales paired with higher-quality marijuana. Her analysis suggests that marijuana users (e.g., someone relaxed with “a B.C. blunt and nachos”) pose less civic threat than meth addicts desperate for their next hit. This reflects her pragmatic, if unconventional, perspective on drug policy and crime prevention, contrasting with traditional law enforcement views.3. Analyze the killer’s psychological state and motivations as he stalks Kelly Barker. How does the chapter build tension around his plan?
Answer:
The killer is portrayed as deeply unstable—filled with rage, self-loathing, and a sense of doom. His physical deterioration (obesity, acne, dandruff) mirrors his psychological decay. The chapter builds tension through his repetitive surveillance of Barker’s home, his escalating anger at being made to wait, and his meticulous yet deranged planning (e.g., the fake beard, scouting escape routes). His internal monologue (“Dumb and doomed”) and violent fantasies (shooting Barker or her husband) create dread, culminating in the cliffhanger as he prepares to act.4. How does Sherrill’s personal reflection on relationships contrast with the killer’s mindset, and what thematic purpose does this serve?
Answer:
Sherrill’s musings about romantic possibilities (Davenport, Rick, the surgeon) reveal a longing for connection and stability, even as she critiques each man’s flaws. This introspection—about loyalty, children, and aging—humanizes her and underscores normalcy. In stark contrast, the killer’s isolation and misogyny (“contempt in the eyes of the little girls he used”) highlight his dehumanization. The juxtaposition reinforces themes of choice and consequence: Sherrill weighs life options, while the killer’s nihilism drives him toward violence.5. Evaluate the significance of media manipulation in the chapter, both by Davenport and Kelly Barker. How does it impact the investigation?
Answer:
Media serves as a double-edged sword: Davenport leverages it to pressure authorities into prioritizing the John Fell case, while Barker’s TV appearances force Sherrill to engage in “PR” outreach. The chief’s focus on Barker’s coverage reflects institutional anxiety about public perception. This dynamic complicates the investigation, as procedural work is overshadowed by performative optics. The killer’s awareness of Barker’s visibility (via TV) also escalates his threat, tying media exposure directly to danger.
Quotes
1. “Among other things, she believed, he was manipulating the media to put pressure on the Minneapolis PD to dig up every scrap of information they could find on the mystery man, John Fell.”
This quote reveals Davenport’s strategic use of media to advance the investigation, showcasing his unorthodox methods and relentless pursuit of justice, even if it means creating headaches for his colleagues.
2. “In her humble opinion, a guy lying on his living room floor with a B.C. blunt, a bag of nachos, and Wheel of Fortune on the TV was less likely to do serious civic damage than some freaked-out tweaker looking for another hit.”
Sherrill’s darkly humorous observation highlights the changing landscape of crime and drug use, reflecting both her pragmatic worldview and the chapter’s underlying commentary on urban policing challenges.
3. “He was one morose and angry motherfucker, he admitted to himself, and things weren’t getting any better. He had no life, had never had one.”
This brutally honest self-assessment from the killer provides critical insight into his psychology and motivations, establishing the dangerous mindset that drives him toward violence against Kelly Barker.
4. “Ring the bell, kill the bitch, and wheel. If her husband answered, knock him down with a couple of shots, go in after the woman, put her down, and go out the back.”
The killer’s coldly methodical planning demonstrates both his calculated brutality and the imminent threat to Kelly Barker, creating intense narrative tension as the chapter builds toward its climax.