Cover of Buried Prey
    FictionMysteryPoliticsThriller

    Buried Prey

    by Sandford, John
    “Buried Prey” by John Sandford is a gripping crime thriller featuring detective Lucas Davenport. When the bodies of two missing girls are discovered decades after their disappearance, Davenport revisits a cold case that has haunted him since his early career. The novel alternates between the original investigation and the present-day pursuit of justice, exploring themes of persistence, guilt, and the passage of time. Sandford’s sharp prose and intricate plotting highlight the complexities of police work and the personal toll of unsolved crimes. A standout in the Prey series, this book delves into Davenport’s character while delivering a tense, satisfying mystery.

    Lucas Dav­en­port, pre­oc­cu­pied with the recent dis­cov­ery of the Jones girls’ remains, shifts between bureau­crat­ic tasks and per­son­al reflec­tions. He directs his researcher to locate the girls’ par­ents and approves crime-relat­ed state­ments for the gov­er­nor. Mean­while, he coor­di­nates with Mar­cy Sher­rill to arrange a chaplain’s noti­fi­ca­tion to the griev­ing fam­i­ly. The weight of the case lingers as Lucas attends a con­tentious meet­ing about DNA sam­pling for arrestees, though he remains detached from the debate. Lat­er, he dis­cuss­es the case over din­ner, spark­ing a foren­sic con­ver­sa­tion, and ends the evening with social vis­i­tors before retir­ing, only to dream of the Jones girls.

    Lucas’s per­son­al life inter­twines with his pro­fes­sion­al con­cerns as he wakes in the ear­ly hours, think­ing about his preg­nant wife, Weath­er, and their grow­ing fam­i­ly. Excit­ed about their upcom­ing daugh­ter, he reflects on his love for his exist­ing chil­dren, includ­ing his adopt­ed daugh­ter Let­ty. Despite his con­tent­ment, he wor­ries about Weather’s health and sleep strug­gles due to her preg­nan­cy. As he dozes off again, mem­o­ries of his old col­league Fred Carter resur­face, along with Carter’s grim humor about retire­ment and ter­ror­ism. The Jones girls’ haunt­ing images per­sist in Lucas’s mind, under­scor­ing the unre­solved case.

    At dawn, Lucas retrieves news­pa­pers, eager for cov­er­age of the Jones case. The *Star Tri­bune* fea­tures it promi­nent­ly, while the *Pio­neer Press* buries it, high­light­ing media dis­crep­an­cies. The arti­cle reveals the frac­tured lives of the Jones par­ents, deep­en­ing Lucas’s somber mood. After read­ing, he returns to bed briefly, then wakes refreshed and calls his col­league Del to express his desire to join the inves­ti­ga­tion. Del acknowl­edges the polit­i­cal hur­dles of involv­ing Lucas in a Min­neapo­lis case but agrees they could han­dle it bet­ter than the local team.

    The chap­ter cap­tures Lucas’s dual focus on the haunt­ing cold case and his domes­tic life. His deter­mi­na­tion to pur­sue jus­tice for the Jones girls con­trasts with his ten­der moments with fam­i­ly, reveal­ing his mul­ti­fac­eted char­ac­ter. The unre­solved ten­sion between pro­fes­sion­al duty and per­son­al ful­fill­ment dri­ves the nar­ra­tive for­ward, set­ting the stage for his deep­er involve­ment in the inves­ti­ga­tion. The chap­ter ends with Lucas poised to take action, bridg­ing his past expe­ri­ences with the present case.

    FAQs

    • 1. What is Lucas’s emotional state regarding the discovery of the Jones girls’ bodies, and how does it manifest in his daily life?

      Answer:
      Lucas is deeply affected by the discovery of the Jones girls’ bodies, as evidenced by his inability to “get away” from thoughts of them throughout the day. The case preoccupies him—he discusses it during dinner, dreams about the girls at night, and wakes up at 4 a.m. with the dream lingering. His emotional turmoil is subtle but persistent, showing in his distracted demeanor (e.g., calling it “another day in the life”) and his subconscious revisiting of the past (dreaming of his younger self with Fred Carter). This reflects how unresolved cases weigh on him psychologically.

      2. How does the chapter illustrate the tension between law enforcement procedures and civil liberties, using the DNA sampling debate as an example?

      Answer:
      The chapter highlights this tension through Lucas’s meeting about collecting DNA samples from arrestees. Civil libertarians argue it violates privacy, while proponents compare it to routine mugshots and fingerprints. Lucas’s apathetic reaction—wanting to “lie down and take a nap”—suggests bureaucratic fatigue with such debates. However, the discussion underscores broader themes in the chapter: balancing investigative tools (like DNA) with ethical boundaries, mirroring the moral complexities in the Jones case. The scene also critiques systemic inertia, as Lucas’s disengagement implies these debates often lack resolution.

      3. Analyze how Lucas’s personal life (e.g., family, routines) contrasts with his professional challenges in this chapter.

      Answer:
      Lucas’s domestic stability—his pregnant wife Weather, their children, and mundane routines (e.g., fetching newspapers, hosting friends)—sharply contrasts with his professional turmoil. While he cherishes family (e.g., excitement for a new daughter, watching Weather sleep), the Jones case intrudes via dreams and preoccupation. The juxtaposition humanizes him: his thrill at “beating the door in his underwear” contrasts with his grim reflections on the girls’ “bony smiles.” This duality emphasizes how detectives compartmentalize trauma, yet underscores how work seeps into personal life, as seen in his 4 a.m. wakefulness.

      4. Why might the author include the anecdote about Fred Carter and his retirement fears? How does it connect to the chapter’s themes?

      Answer:
      Carter’s anecdote serves two purposes. First, it reinforces the theme of mortality—his morbid joke about terrorists “dropping the dome on [his] head” parallels the Jones girls’ unresolved deaths, both underscoring life’s fragility. Second, it reflects Lucas’s nostalgia and unresolved guilt. Carter, a relic of Lucas’s past, symbolizes lingering regrets (like the cold case). His focus on retirement—a future he may not live to enjoy—mirrors Lucas’s introspection about aging (“looking at fifty”) and legacy, tying into the chapter’s exploration of time, memory, and justice.

      5. How does the chapter use media (newspapers, TV) to comment on the public’s relationship to crime stories?

      Answer:
      The chapter critiques media sensationalism and competition. Lucas notes the Star Tribune prominently features the Jones story, while the Pioneer Press buries it—likely due to missing the scoop. This reflects how media prioritizes drama over sensitivity (e.g., interviewing the girls’ divorced parents). The impending TV coverage also pressures law enforcement (“It’s gonna be on TV pretty quick”), showing how public scrutiny shapes investigations. The contrast between Lucas’s personal grief and the media’s commodification of tragedy highlights a recurring theme: the dissonance between human stories and their public portrayal.

    Quotes

    • 1. “Lucas’s position was supine: that is, whenever he heard people arguing about it, he wanted to lie down and take a nap.”

      This quote humorously captures Lucas’s disengagement from bureaucratic debates (in this case, about DNA sampling) while subtly commenting on the exhausting nature of political discussions in law enforcement.

      2. “Girls are always good. More girls are even better.”

      This simple yet powerful statement reflects Lucas’s deep affection for his daughters (both biological and adopted) and his joyful anticipation of welcoming another girl into his family, revealing his softer paternal side.

      3. “‘The thing is,’ he’d told Lucas, ‘you can never tell where the terrorists will hit next. What if they decide on a big city, but one out of the limelight? One that no one expects?’”

      This dialogue with Carter highlights the pervasive post-911 anxiety among law enforcement, even in mundane security jobs, while showcasing the dark humor and fatalism common in their profession.

      4. “Besides, he got a little thrill from beating the door in his underwear.”

      This small, humanizing detail reveals Lucas’s playful side and the mundane rituals that ground him amidst heavy criminal investigations and family responsibilities.

      5. “‘I want to get in on this.’ […] ‘They won’t do it as well as you and I would.’”

      This exchange with Del shows Lucas’s professional pride and instincts kicking in regarding the Jones case, setting up his re-engagement with this haunting cold case from his past.

    Quotes

    1. “Lucas’s position was supine: that is, whenever he heard people arguing about it, he wanted to lie down and take a nap.”

    This quote humorously captures Lucas’s disengagement from bureaucratic debates (in this case, about DNA sampling) while subtly commenting on the exhausting nature of political discussions in law enforcement.

    2. “Girls are always good. More girls are even better.”

    This simple yet powerful statement reflects Lucas’s deep affection for his daughters (both biological and adopted) and his joyful anticipation of welcoming another girl into his family, revealing his softer paternal side.

    3. “‘The thing is,’ he’d told Lucas, ‘you can never tell where the terrorists will hit next. What if they decide on a big city, but one out of the limelight? One that no one expects?’”

    This dialogue with Carter highlights the pervasive post-911 anxiety among law enforcement, even in mundane security jobs, while showcasing the dark humor and fatalism common in their profession.

    4. “Besides, he got a little thrill from beating the door in his underwear.”

    This small, humanizing detail reveals Lucas’s playful side and the mundane rituals that ground him amidst heavy criminal investigations and family responsibilities.

    5. “‘I want to get in on this.’ […] ‘They won’t do it as well as you and I would.’”

    This exchange with Del shows Lucas’s professional pride and instincts kicking in regarding the Jones case, setting up his re-engagement with this haunting cold case from his past.

    FAQs

    1. What is Lucas’s emotional state regarding the discovery of the Jones girls’ bodies, and how does it manifest in his daily life?

    Answer:
    Lucas is deeply affected by the discovery of the Jones girls’ bodies, as evidenced by his inability to “get away” from thoughts of them throughout the day. The case preoccupies him—he discusses it during dinner, dreams about the girls at night, and wakes up at 4 a.m. with the dream lingering. His emotional turmoil is subtle but persistent, showing in his distracted demeanor (e.g., calling it “another day in the life”) and his subconscious revisiting of the past (dreaming of his younger self with Fred Carter). This reflects how unresolved cases weigh on him psychologically.

    2. How does the chapter illustrate the tension between law enforcement procedures and civil liberties, using the DNA sampling debate as an example?

    Answer:
    The chapter highlights this tension through Lucas’s meeting about collecting DNA samples from arrestees. Civil libertarians argue it violates privacy, while proponents compare it to routine mugshots and fingerprints. Lucas’s apathetic reaction—wanting to “lie down and take a nap”—suggests bureaucratic fatigue with such debates. However, the discussion underscores broader themes in the chapter: balancing investigative tools (like DNA) with ethical boundaries, mirroring the moral complexities in the Jones case. The scene also critiques systemic inertia, as Lucas’s disengagement implies these debates often lack resolution.

    3. Analyze how Lucas’s personal life (e.g., family, routines) contrasts with his professional challenges in this chapter.

    Answer:
    Lucas’s domestic stability—his pregnant wife Weather, their children, and mundane routines (e.g., fetching newspapers, hosting friends)—sharply contrasts with his professional turmoil. While he cherishes family (e.g., excitement for a new daughter, watching Weather sleep), the Jones case intrudes via dreams and preoccupation. The juxtaposition humanizes him: his thrill at “beating the door in his underwear” contrasts with his grim reflections on the girls’ “bony smiles.” This duality emphasizes how detectives compartmentalize trauma, yet underscores how work seeps into personal life, as seen in his 4 a.m. wakefulness.

    4. Why might the author include the anecdote about Fred Carter and his retirement fears? How does it connect to the chapter’s themes?

    Answer:
    Carter’s anecdote serves two purposes. First, it reinforces the theme of mortality—his morbid joke about terrorists “dropping the dome on [his] head” parallels the Jones girls’ unresolved deaths, both underscoring life’s fragility. Second, it reflects Lucas’s nostalgia and unresolved guilt. Carter, a relic of Lucas’s past, symbolizes lingering regrets (like the cold case). His focus on retirement—a future he may not live to enjoy—mirrors Lucas’s introspection about aging (“looking at fifty”) and legacy, tying into the chapter’s exploration of time, memory, and justice.

    5. How does the chapter use media (newspapers, TV) to comment on the public’s relationship to crime stories?

    Answer:
    The chapter critiques media sensationalism and competition. Lucas notes the Star Tribune prominently features the Jones story, while the Pioneer Press buries it—likely due to missing the scoop. This reflects how media prioritizes drama over sensitivity (e.g., interviewing the girls’ divorced parents). The impending TV coverage also pressures law enforcement (“It’s gonna be on TV pretty quick”), showing how public scrutiny shapes investigations. The contrast between Lucas’s personal grief and the media’s commodification of tragedy highlights a recurring theme: the dissonance between human stories and their public portrayal.

    Note