Search Jump: Comments
    Chapter Index
    Back to Story
    Cover of Buried Prey
    FictionMysteryPoliticsThriller

    Buried Prey

    by Sandford, John
    “Buried Prey” by John Sandford is a gripping crime thriller featuring detective Lucas Davenport. When the bodies of two missing girls are discovered decades after their disappearance, Davenport revisits a cold case that has haunted him since his early career. The novel alternates between the original investigation and the present-day pursuit of justice, exploring themes of persistence, guilt, and the passage of time. Sandford’s sharp prose and intricate plotting highlight the complexities of police work and the personal toll of unsolved crimes. A standout in the Prey series, this book delves into Davenport’s character while delivering a tense, satisfying mystery.
    PreviousNext
    Buried Prey

    Chapter 3

    by Sandford, John

    In Chap­ter 3, detec­tives Lucas and Sloan spend a late night can­vass­ing a neigh­bor­hood, search­ing for leads in a case involv­ing miss­ing girls. The streets are unusu­al­ly qui­et due to the heavy police pres­ence, which has tem­porar­i­ly dri­ven away the usu­al crim­i­nal activ­i­ty. Their con­ver­sa­tion shifts to the impact of crack cocaine on the local under­world, not­ing how it has dis­rupt­ed tra­di­tion­al hier­ar­chies, such as pimps los­ing con­trol over sex work­ers. Sloan, a sea­soned and method­i­cal inves­ti­ga­tor, shares his insights on the chang­ing dynam­ics of crime, while Lucas, younger and more impul­sive, reflects on the rapid rise of crack and its soci­etal con­se­quences. Their ban­ter reveals their con­trast­ing per­son­al­i­ties but also their mutu­al respect.

    As they con­tin­ue door-to-door inquiries, Sloan and Lucas dis­cuss the tran­si­tion from patrol to plain­clothes work, com­par­ing it to the dif­fer­ence between foot­ball and chess. Their exchange turns humor­ous as Sloan ranks ath­letes’ intel­li­gence by sport, teas­ing Lucas about hock­ey play­ers. Despite the grim nature of their task, their cama­raderie pro­vides moments of lev­i­ty. The detec­tives approach a run­down house, where a reluc­tant wit­ness claims no knowl­edge of the miss­ing girls but hints at a poten­tial suspect—a “crazy guy” with a his­to­ry of sex­u­al offens­es. This vague lead becomes their first tan­gi­ble clue, though the wit­ness pro­vides lit­tle con­crete infor­ma­tion.

    The inves­ti­ga­tion gains momen­tum when anoth­er res­i­dent men­tions a man named John, who fre­quents a local bar and has spec­u­lat­ed about the “crazy guy” being respon­si­ble. John’s descrip­tion and his con­nec­tion to sex work­ers at a near­by mas­sage par­lor add lay­ers to the case. Lucas press­es for details, sens­ing urgency, but Sloan fol­lows pro­to­col by call­ing for back­up. When senior detec­tives Cher­ry and McGuire arrive, they take over the lead, frus­trat­ing Lucas, who believes they should pur­sue John imme­di­ate­ly. The ten­sion high­lights Lucas’s impa­tience with bureau­crat­ic hur­dles and his desire for swift action.

    The chap­ter ends with Lucas and Sloan con­tin­u­ing their door-knock­ing, though Lucas grows increas­ing­ly irri­tat­ed at being side­lined from the most promis­ing lead. Sloan, more prag­mat­ic, accepts the hier­ar­chi­cal nature of police work, advis­ing Lucas that expe­ri­ence will bring greater auton­o­my. Lucas, how­ev­er, resents the delay and with­holds infor­ma­tion about the mas­sage par­lor, opt­ing to let the senior detec­tives fig­ure it out them­selves. Their dynam­ic under­scores the chal­lenges of team­work in law enforce­ment, bal­anc­ing indi­vid­ual ini­tia­tive with pro­ce­dur­al con­straints. The chap­ter leaves the inves­ti­ga­tion unre­solved, empha­siz­ing the tedious yet crit­i­cal nature of detec­tive work.

    Down­load PDF Sum­ma­ry

    FAQs

    • 1. How does the chapter illustrate the impact of crack cocaine on the urban environment and criminal dynamics?

      Answer:
      The chapter highlights crack cocaine’s disruptive influence on the social and criminal landscape. Sloan observes that the drug trade has displaced traditional pimps, revealing a shift in power structures (“The pimps got fired… Turns out it was more complicated than that”). The sheer number of police presence temporarily suppresses criminal activity (“so many cops on the street that the bad people moved over”), emphasizing crack’s destabilizing effect. Lucas and Sloan’s dialogue contrasts past drug trends (“nobody even heard of crack”) with the current epidemic, underscoring how crack democratized drug use (“Toot for the common people”) and reshaped urban crime hierarchies.

      2. Analyze how the chapter characterizes the professional relationship between Lucas and Sloan through their dialogue and interactions.

      Answer:
      The chapter portrays Lucas and Sloan as contrasting yet complementary partners. Sloan’s methodical nature (“conservative in lifestyle as in dress”) balances Lucas’s impatience (“Fuck a bunch of four years”). Their banter about sports intelligence reveals mutual respect through humor, with Sloan’s deadpan delivery (“dumber’n a box of rocks”) contrasting Lucas’s sarcastic retorts. Professionally, Sloan accepts bureaucratic constraints (“Get used to it”), while Lucas chafes against them (“Let them find it out themselves”). Their shared dedication emerges during investigative work, particularly when pressing witnesses about the “crazy guy” lead, demonstrating effective teamwork despite differing approaches.

      3. What investigative techniques and interpersonal dynamics are demonstrated during the door-to-door interviews?

      Answer:
      The chapter showcases practical policing techniques: systematic neighborhood canvassing (“pounding on doors”), witness rapport-building (Lucas engaging the woman about “John”), and observational skills (Sloan noting the “bad dog” stake). Effective interrogation tactics appear when Lucas subtly pressures the reluctant man by emphasizing urgency (“these two girls might not have much time”). The detectives divide roles naturally—Sloan radios for backup while Lucas extracts details about John’s appearance. Bureaucratic tensions surface when senior detectives Cherry and McGuire take over the promising lead, highlighting real-world investigative frustrations and jurisdictional conflicts.

      4. How does the chapter use minor characters to advance both the plot and thematic elements?

      Answer:
      Minor characters serve dual purposes: advancing the missing girls case while reinforcing themes of urban decay and unreliable narratives. The chain-locked resident (“I gotta get up at five o’clock”) exemplifies community disengagement, contrasting with the helpful couple who provide the “John” tip. John himself—described via stereotypes (“Italian-looking”) and hearsay—embodies the challenges of verifying urban rumors. The massage parlor workers, mentioned obliquely (“what if somebody thought I was one of them”), reflect societal judgments. These characters collectively create a textured environment where truth is fragmented, mirroring the detectives’ struggle to piece together credible leads.

      5. Evaluate how the chapter establishes narrative tension through both procedural details and broader social commentary.

      Answer:
      Tension arises through intersecting layers: the immediate time pressure of the missing girls case, procedural obstacles (detectives being reassigned), and societal undercurrents like the crack epidemic. The “crazy guy” lead dangles promise but remains frustratingly vague, while bureaucratic delays (“wait until they get here”) heighten urgency. Social commentary permeates the investigation—the displaced pimps symbolize shifting crime economies, and the witnesses’ reluctance reflects community distrust. Even Sloan’s sports rant serves as tension relief while subtly critiquing stereotypes. This multilayered approach transforms routine police work into a microcosm of broader urban struggles, keeping readers engaged with both plot and context.

    Quotes

    • 1. “The pimps got fired. We used to think that the hookers were slaves. Turns out it was more complicated than that.”

      This quote captures Sloan’s observation about how the crack epidemic unexpectedly disrupted traditional sex work hierarchies. It reveals an unexpected social consequence of the drug crisis and challenges common assumptions about prostitution dynamics.

      2. “Patrol is like football; plainclothes is like chess.”

      Sloan uses this sports analogy to explain the difference between police patrol work and detective work. The comparison highlights the strategic thinking required in plainclothes investigations versus the more reactive nature of patrol work.

      3. “In the major college sports, football’s at the top of the intelligence ratings, then wrestling, then basketball, then golf, swimming, hockey, baseball, and tennis, in that order.”

      This humorous exchange reveals the camaraderie between Lucas and Sloan while also showcasing Sloan’s quirky personality and unexpected knowledge about athlete intelligence rankings, adding levity to their serious investigation.

      4. “He said the guy was always lookin’, and never gettin’ any. Said the guy had a record, you know, for sex stuff.”

      This crucial lead about a potential suspect introduces the first concrete clue in their missing girls case. The quote reveals how street-level information and neighborhood gossip can be valuable in police investigations.

      5. “We did the work, man, they oughta let us take it.” … “Get used to it. Takes about four years before you’re a pro.”

      This exchange highlights Lucas’s frustration with police bureaucracy and Sloan’s more experienced perspective on career progression in law enforcement. It shows the tension between initiative and protocol in police work.

    Quotes

    1. “The pimps got fired. We used to think that the hookers were slaves. Turns out it was more complicated than that.”

    This quote captures Sloan’s observation about how the crack epidemic unexpectedly disrupted traditional sex work hierarchies. It reveals an unexpected social consequence of the drug crisis and challenges common assumptions about prostitution dynamics.

    2. “Patrol is like football; plainclothes is like chess.”

    Sloan uses this sports analogy to explain the difference between police patrol work and detective work. The comparison highlights the strategic thinking required in plainclothes investigations versus the more reactive nature of patrol work.

    3. “In the major college sports, football’s at the top of the intelligence ratings, then wrestling, then basketball, then golf, swimming, hockey, baseball, and tennis, in that order.”

    This humorous exchange reveals the camaraderie between Lucas and Sloan while also showcasing Sloan’s quirky personality and unexpected knowledge about athlete intelligence rankings, adding levity to their serious investigation.

    4. “He said the guy was always lookin’, and never gettin’ any. Said the guy had a record, you know, for sex stuff.”

    This crucial lead about a potential suspect introduces the first concrete clue in their missing girls case. The quote reveals how street-level information and neighborhood gossip can be valuable in police investigations.

    5. “We did the work, man, they oughta let us take it.” … “Get used to it. Takes about four years before you’re a pro.”

    This exchange highlights Lucas’s frustration with police bureaucracy and Sloan’s more experienced perspective on career progression in law enforcement. It shows the tension between initiative and protocol in police work.

    FAQs

    1. How does the chapter illustrate the impact of crack cocaine on the urban environment and criminal dynamics?

    Answer:
    The chapter highlights crack cocaine’s disruptive influence on the social and criminal landscape. Sloan observes that the drug trade has displaced traditional pimps, revealing a shift in power structures (“The pimps got fired… Turns out it was more complicated than that”). The sheer number of police presence temporarily suppresses criminal activity (“so many cops on the street that the bad people moved over”), emphasizing crack’s destabilizing effect. Lucas and Sloan’s dialogue contrasts past drug trends (“nobody even heard of crack”) with the current epidemic, underscoring how crack democratized drug use (“Toot for the common people”) and reshaped urban crime hierarchies.

    2. Analyze how the chapter characterizes the professional relationship between Lucas and Sloan through their dialogue and interactions.

    Answer:
    The chapter portrays Lucas and Sloan as contrasting yet complementary partners. Sloan’s methodical nature (“conservative in lifestyle as in dress”) balances Lucas’s impatience (“Fuck a bunch of four years”). Their banter about sports intelligence reveals mutual respect through humor, with Sloan’s deadpan delivery (“dumber’n a box of rocks”) contrasting Lucas’s sarcastic retorts. Professionally, Sloan accepts bureaucratic constraints (“Get used to it”), while Lucas chafes against them (“Let them find it out themselves”). Their shared dedication emerges during investigative work, particularly when pressing witnesses about the “crazy guy” lead, demonstrating effective teamwork despite differing approaches.

    3. What investigative techniques and interpersonal dynamics are demonstrated during the door-to-door interviews?

    Answer:
    The chapter showcases practical policing techniques: systematic neighborhood canvassing (“pounding on doors”), witness rapport-building (Lucas engaging the woman about “John”), and observational skills (Sloan noting the “bad dog” stake). Effective interrogation tactics appear when Lucas subtly pressures the reluctant man by emphasizing urgency (“these two girls might not have much time”). The detectives divide roles naturally—Sloan radios for backup while Lucas extracts details about John’s appearance. Bureaucratic tensions surface when senior detectives Cherry and McGuire take over the promising lead, highlighting real-world investigative frustrations and jurisdictional conflicts.

    4. How does the chapter use minor characters to advance both the plot and thematic elements?

    Answer:
    Minor characters serve dual purposes: advancing the missing girls case while reinforcing themes of urban decay and unreliable narratives. The chain-locked resident (“I gotta get up at five o’clock”) exemplifies community disengagement, contrasting with the helpful couple who provide the “John” tip. John himself—described via stereotypes (“Italian-looking”) and hearsay—embodies the challenges of verifying urban rumors. The massage parlor workers, mentioned obliquely (“what if somebody thought I was one of them”), reflect societal judgments. These characters collectively create a textured environment where truth is fragmented, mirroring the detectives’ struggle to piece together credible leads.

    5. Evaluate how the chapter establishes narrative tension through both procedural details and broader social commentary.

    Answer:
    Tension arises through intersecting layers: the immediate time pressure of the missing girls case, procedural obstacles (detectives being reassigned), and societal undercurrents like the crack epidemic. The “crazy guy” lead dangles promise but remains frustratingly vague, while bureaucratic delays (“wait until they get here”) heighten urgency. Social commentary permeates the investigation—the displaced pimps symbolize shifting crime economies, and the witnesses’ reluctance reflects community distrust. Even Sloan’s sports rant serves as tension relief while subtly critiquing stereotypes. This multilayered approach transforms routine police work into a microcosm of broader urban struggles, keeping readers engaged with both plot and context.

    Note