Header Background Image

    In this chapter, the author contrasts the master of hounds described in Jorrocks’ anecdotes with the traditional, prestigious role of English hunt leadership. Describing Mr. Jorrocks as a stopgap figure, someone who fills the role out of necessity rather than nobility, the text quickly parts ways with this image to delve into the idealized figure of the master of hounds. This ideal master is depicted as a well-off, integral figure in English country life, often a longstanding county resident or a wealthy individual who has moved to the countryside with the express purpose of hunting. The narrative underscores the importance of wealth and willingness to spend generously for the benefit of the hunt and local community, portraying the master as a guardian of tradition and social cohesion.

    The discussion expands on the operational and financial aspects of managing a hunt, emphasizing that maintaining high standards requires substantial personal investment beyond the formal subscription fees collected from participants. The author critiques economical hunting practices for diminishing the quality and sustainability of the sport, likening the master’s need for financial liberality to ensuring the smooth operation of elaborate machinery.

    This chapter also characterizes the master of hounds according to his management and social style, comparing subscription-based hunts favorably against the autocratic, empire-like approach remembered from earlier eras. The balance between autocracy and a democratically underpinned financial contribution from participants suggests a refined, contemporary model that respects both tradition and the egalitarian shift in sportsmanship.

    The narrative glorifies the role of the master of hounds, framing it as a position of both power and profound responsibility. While enjoying almost regal reverence within the hunting community, the master must navigate the complexities of managing land, wildlife, and human relations with wisdom, fairness, and an inexhaustible commitment to the sport. The chapter concludes by reflecting on the character and conduct requisite for a master of hounds, describing an ideal leader who commands respect through dignified, decisive, yet considerate oversight of the hunt, serving as a model of leadership that harmonizes authority with empathy and integrity.

    0 Comments

    Heads up! Your comment will be invisible to other guests and subscribers (except for replies), including you after a grace period.
    Note