THE HUNTING PARSON

The chapter delves into the complex figure of the hunting parson, confronting the societal disapproval that clergymen face when indulging in the sport of hunting. The author grapples with his own conflicted feelings, recognizing the public’s censure while personally struggling to see the harm in a clergyman’s participation in hunting. The key argument against clerical hunting—that it consumes time that should be devoted to parish duties—falls flat to the author, who counters that clergymen, living in rural settings and less burdened by their professional roles than assumed, can afford the time more than other professions.

Despite the rationale that hunting may even suit a clergyman’s schedule better than most, societal prejudice persists, rooted not in practical concern but rather in the moralistic view held by a “respectable section of the world.” These critics, likened to old ladies, irrationally equate hunting with sinful activities, unable even to articulate why it’s deemed so repugnant beyond a gut feeling of its impropriety.

The narrative wryly observes the changing cultural landscape wherein clerical leisure has become increasingly scrutinized and restricted, noting the past acceptability of activities now frowned upon. The author laments the stringent expectations placed on clergymen to forgo common social pastimes, suggesting these limitations deter desirable candidates from the clergy and place an unreasonable demand for piety akin to that of saintly figures.

Moreover, the hunting parson’s attire and demeanor are scrutinized, outlining the subtle ways he navigates his controversial pastime—through his dress and the careful segmentation of his sporting and clerical identities, maintaining a delicate balance between his passion and his profession. Despite societal rebuke, the hunting parson emerges as a skilled and enthusiastic participant, albeit one who often justifies or conceals his involvement, evidencing the internal conflict between his identity as a clergyman and as a sportsman.

Ultimately, the author expresses a fondness for the hunting parson, valuing his company and conversation, and appreciating the dimension he adds to hunting gatherings. However, the chapter closes on a note of resignation; no matter the justification or the personal fulfillment derived from hunting, the hunting parson battles against societal expectations, struggling to reconcile his leisure with his occupational duties and the moral judgments of his community.