Header Background Image

    In his letter to Mr. Arthur Wincott of Topeka, Kansas, the author broaches the topic of modern English poetry, responding to a request for letters aimed at living authors—a task he deems inappropriate due to potential impertinence. However, he elevates the notion of utilizing the epistolary style for literary critique, akin to the methods of the Tatler and Spectator, allowing for a blend of personal taste and perhaps prejudice within his observations on poetry. Poetry, he observes, holds a venerable status in literature, despite its waning popularity and the modern democratic age’s lukewarm reception towards it. The proliferation of poetical societies, he argues, signals a decline in poetry’s art, as it shows a reliance on communal engagement over individual appreciation.

    Amidst this backdrop, the letter reflects on the curious state of English poetry, marked by the presence of renowned poets yet a scarcity of commendable new poetry. He ponders the inherent challenges in assessing poetry, influenced by an inclination towards novelty, and questions the enduring legacy of contemporary poets. Despite these challenges, the author firmly positions Tennyson among the greats in the English poetic tradition, acknowledging both his imperfections and major contributions. Tennyson’s diverse themes and stylistic features are acknowledged, from his portrayal of grief in “In Memoriam” to his reimagining of classical myths and legends.

    The letter contrasts Tennyson’s universal appeal with the enigmatic allure of Robert Browning, whose obscurity is both a charm and a hurdle for readers. Browning’s profound exploration of human nature in “Men and Women” is lauded, potential for enduring literary significance. However, the author expresses skepticism over the longevity of Browning’s more impenetrable works.

    Matthew Arnold is commended for the resonant beauty of his poetry, despite not reaching the poetic heights of Tennyson or the intense scrutiny of Browning. Arnold’s poetry, reflective and often tinged with melancholy, earns a special place in the author’s esteem for its introspective quality and enduring emotional impact.

    The letter, thus, serves as a contemplative examination of modern English poetry, navigating the complexities of literary critique with a personal, yet critical lens, maintaining a dialogue between personal affinity and objective analysis.

    0 Comments

    Heads up! Your comment will be invisible to other guests and subscribers (except for replies), including you after a grace period.
    Note